Artwork

المحتوى المقدم من Marian Erikson. يتم تحميل جميع محتويات البودكاست بما في ذلك الحلقات والرسومات وأوصاف البودكاست وتقديمها مباشرة بواسطة Marian Erikson أو شريك منصة البودكاست الخاص بهم. إذا كنت تعتقد أن شخصًا ما يستخدم عملك المحمي بحقوق الطبع والنشر دون إذنك، فيمكنك اتباع العملية الموضحة هنا https://ar.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - تطبيق بودكاست
انتقل إلى وضع عدم الاتصال باستخدام تطبيق Player FM !

869: History of the Anti-Vivisection Movement from Animal-Free Science Advocacy

9:28
 
مشاركة
 

Manage episode 435550832 series 2917244
المحتوى المقدم من Marian Erikson. يتم تحميل جميع محتويات البودكاست بما في ذلك الحلقات والرسومات وأوصاف البودكاست وتقديمها مباشرة بواسطة Marian Erikson أو شريك منصة البودكاست الخاص بهم. إذا كنت تعتقد أن شخصًا ما يستخدم عملك المحمي بحقوق الطبع والنشر دون إذنك، فيمكنك اتباع العملية الموضحة هنا https://ar.player.fm/legal.

History of the Anti-Vivisection Movement from Animal-Free Science Advocacy at AnimalFreeScienceAdvocacy.org.au

Original post: https://animalfreescienceadvocacy.org.au/resources/history-of-anti-vivisection-movement/

Animal-Free Science Advocacy (AFSA) Vision: “A future where no animals are harmed in the name of science, and scientific progress is advanced through animal-free research methods”

Why?

  1. Research data obtained from animal experimentation and extrapolated to human conditions is unreliable and ineffective, and delays progress for human health.

  2. Animal-based research and teaching represents unnecessarily cruel, empirically compromised and unethical treatment of non-consenting sentient beings.

  3. The replacement of animals with validated non-animal methods will facilitate scientifically reliable, effective, empirically valid research outcomes.

AFSA recognises that some research, such as observation of wild animals for conservation purposes, is non-invasive, and that in some circumstances, veterinary research or training can be conducted without harm to animals. Whilst we advocate for animal-free research, we accept that under very limited conditions, animal use may be permissible, when in the interests of the individual animal/s used in such research. Put simply, they disagree with any harmful use of animals in science

What is ‘harmful use’? Any use of animals that cause pain, suffering, distress, or lasting negative impact, including death—without any clear benefit to the animals themselves. Note: even if the research conducted is not considered harmful, the laboratory environment itself can cause suffering and the prevention of natural behaviors and thus be detrimental.

How to support the podcast:

Share with others.

Recommend the podcast on your social media.

Follow/subscribe to the show wherever you listen.

Buy some vegan/plant based merch: https://www.plantbasedbriefing.com/shop

Follow Plant Based Briefing on social media:

Twitter: @PlantBasedBrief

YouTube: YouTube.com/PlantBasedBriefing

Facebook: Facebook.com/PlantBasedBriefing

LinkedIn: Plant Based Briefing Podcast

Instagram: @PlantBasedBriefing

#vegan #plantbased #plantbasedbriefing #vivisection #animalfreescience #antivivisection #activism

  continue reading

924 حلقات

Artwork
iconمشاركة
 
Manage episode 435550832 series 2917244
المحتوى المقدم من Marian Erikson. يتم تحميل جميع محتويات البودكاست بما في ذلك الحلقات والرسومات وأوصاف البودكاست وتقديمها مباشرة بواسطة Marian Erikson أو شريك منصة البودكاست الخاص بهم. إذا كنت تعتقد أن شخصًا ما يستخدم عملك المحمي بحقوق الطبع والنشر دون إذنك، فيمكنك اتباع العملية الموضحة هنا https://ar.player.fm/legal.

History of the Anti-Vivisection Movement from Animal-Free Science Advocacy at AnimalFreeScienceAdvocacy.org.au

Original post: https://animalfreescienceadvocacy.org.au/resources/history-of-anti-vivisection-movement/

Animal-Free Science Advocacy (AFSA) Vision: “A future where no animals are harmed in the name of science, and scientific progress is advanced through animal-free research methods”

Why?

  1. Research data obtained from animal experimentation and extrapolated to human conditions is unreliable and ineffective, and delays progress for human health.

  2. Animal-based research and teaching represents unnecessarily cruel, empirically compromised and unethical treatment of non-consenting sentient beings.

  3. The replacement of animals with validated non-animal methods will facilitate scientifically reliable, effective, empirically valid research outcomes.

AFSA recognises that some research, such as observation of wild animals for conservation purposes, is non-invasive, and that in some circumstances, veterinary research or training can be conducted without harm to animals. Whilst we advocate for animal-free research, we accept that under very limited conditions, animal use may be permissible, when in the interests of the individual animal/s used in such research. Put simply, they disagree with any harmful use of animals in science

What is ‘harmful use’? Any use of animals that cause pain, suffering, distress, or lasting negative impact, including death—without any clear benefit to the animals themselves. Note: even if the research conducted is not considered harmful, the laboratory environment itself can cause suffering and the prevention of natural behaviors and thus be detrimental.

How to support the podcast:

Share with others.

Recommend the podcast on your social media.

Follow/subscribe to the show wherever you listen.

Buy some vegan/plant based merch: https://www.plantbasedbriefing.com/shop

Follow Plant Based Briefing on social media:

Twitter: @PlantBasedBrief

YouTube: YouTube.com/PlantBasedBriefing

Facebook: Facebook.com/PlantBasedBriefing

LinkedIn: Plant Based Briefing Podcast

Instagram: @PlantBasedBriefing

#vegan #plantbased #plantbasedbriefing #vivisection #animalfreescience #antivivisection #activism

  continue reading

924 حلقات

كل الحلقات

×
 
Loading …

مرحبًا بك في مشغل أف ام!

يقوم برنامج مشغل أف أم بمسح الويب للحصول على بودكاست عالية الجودة لتستمتع بها الآن. إنه أفضل تطبيق بودكاست ويعمل على أجهزة اندرويد والأيفون والويب. قم بالتسجيل لمزامنة الاشتراكات عبر الأجهزة.

 

دليل مرجعي سريع