))
6 - Psychologie gegen den Klimawandel: Gespräch mit Dr. Laura Loy
Manage episode 458540647 series 3630806
المحتوى المقدم من geist:reich. يتم تحميل جميع محتويات البودكاست بما في ذلك الحلقات والرسومات وأوصاف البودكاست وتقديمها مباشرة بواسطة geist:reich أو شريك منصة البودكاست الخاص بهم. إذا كنت تعتقد أن شخصًا ما يستخدم عملك المحمي بحقوق الطبع والنشر دون إذنك، فيمكنك اتباع العملية الموضحة هنا https://ar.player.fm/legal.
Website: https://geistreichpodcast.wordpress.com Instagram: @geistreich_podcast
Steady/Paypal: Wird zurzeit überarbeitet
Quellen
Hauptquelle von Laura: Harré, N. (2018). Psychology for a better world. Working with people to save the planet. Auckland: Auckland University Press.
Ansonsten gut für den Überblick:
Gifford & Nielsson (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review. International Journal of Psychology, 49, 141-157. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12034
Fritsche, I., Barth, M., Jugert, P., Masson, T., & Reese, G. (2018). A social identity model of proenvironmental action (SIMPEA). Psychological Review, 125, 245–269. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000090
Klöckner, C. A. (2013). A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behaviour—A meta-analysis. Global Environmental Change, 23, 1028-1938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.014
Klöckner, C. A. (2014). The psychologyof pro-environmental communication – going beyond standard information strategies. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137348326
Konkret angerissene Studien
1. Kollektive Wirksamkeit: Jugert, P., Greenaway, K. H., Barth, M., Buchner, R., Eisentraut, S., & Fritsche, I. (2016). Collective efficacy increases pro-environmental intentions throughincreasing self-efficacy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 48, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.08.003
2.Wirkung von sozialen Normen: Schultz, P. W., Nolan J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Foldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2018). The Constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms: Reprise. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 249–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617693325
3.Globale Identität und Mind-Body-Practice: Loy, L. S. & Reese, G. (2019). Hype and hope? Mind-body practice predicts pro-environmental engagement through global identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101340
4.Motivation für Aktivismus: Wallis, H., & Loy, L. S. (2021). What drives pro-environmental activism of young people? A survey study on the Fridays For Future movement, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101581
5.Angst und Verleugnung: Wullenkord, M., Tröger, J., Hamann, K. R. S., Loy, L. S., & Reese, G. (2021, preprint). Anxiety and climate change: A validation of the Climate Anxiety Scale in a German-speaking quota sample and an investigation of psychological correlates. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/76ez2
6.Psychologische Distanz und Klimakommunikation: Loy, L. S. & Spence, A. (2020). Reducing, and bridging, the psychological distance of climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101388
27 حلقات
مشاركة
