TikTok at the Supreme Court & Oral Argument Stories

The California Appellate Law Podcast

This is why your teenagers are anxious: TikTok’s fate hangs in the balance at the Supreme Court. We discuss the recent oral arguments, and Donald Trump’s amicus brief asking the Court to sit tight and he’ll make a fantastic deal that will be fantastic and make the Court very happy and everyone will be very happy. (That is the best Trump impression I can do in written form 🤷).

And what does it mean when the Court of Appeal decided an appeal based on what one attorney does—and the other attorney doesn’t do—at oral argument? We discuss *Pollock v. Kelso* where the court decides that the plaintiff is the previaling party according to a settlement….a settlement the court has never seen.

We also cover Blauser v. Dubin discussing what to do when the trial court does not issue a final appealable order.

Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography, LinkedIn profile, and Twitter feed.

Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography, LinkedIn profile, Twitter feed, and YouTube page.

Sign up for Not To Be Published, Tim Kowal’s weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases.

Other items discussed in the episode:

• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynzTXuORJwM
• **Appellate court criticizes trial court practice of failing to enter final appealable orders Blauser v. Dubin** (4D3d Nov. 19, 2024 No. G063715).
• **No reporter’s transcript of attorneys’ fees hearing doomed this appeal Saydman v. Aegis Sec. Ins. Co.** (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 20, 2024 No. G063209) (nonpub. opn.)