))
“The title is reasonable” by Raemon
Manage episode 507700280 series 3364758
المحتوى المقدم من LessWrong. يتم تحميل جميع محتويات البودكاست بما في ذلك الحلقات والرسومات وأوصاف البودكاست وتقديمها مباشرة بواسطة LessWrong أو شريك منصة البودكاست الخاص بهم. إذا كنت تعتقد أن شخصًا ما يستخدم عملك المحمي بحقوق الطبع والنشر دون إذنك، فيمكنك اتباع العملية الموضحة هنا https://ar.player.fm/legal.
I'm annoyed by various people who seem to be complaining about the book title being "unreasonable" – who don't merely disagree with the title of "If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies", but, think something like: "Eliezer and Nate violated a Group-Epistemic-Norm with the title and/or thesis."
I think the title is reasonable.
I think the title is probably true – I'm less confident than Eliezer/Nate, but I don't think it's unreasonable for them to be confident in it given their epistemic state. (I also don't think it's unreasonable to feel less confident than me – it's a confusing topic that it's reasonable to disagree about.).
So I want to defend several decisions about the book I think were:
A) actually pretty reasonable from a meta-group-epistemics/comms perspective
B) very important to do.
I've heard different things from different people and maybe am drawing a cluster where there [...]
---
Outline:
(03:08) 1. Reasons the Everyone Dies thesis is reasonable
(03:14) What the book does and doesnt say
(06:47) The claims are presented reasonably
(13:24) 2. Specific points to maybe disagree on
(16:35) Notes on Niceness
(17:28) Which plan is Least Impossible?
(22:34) 3. Overton Smashing, and Hope
(22:39) Or: Why is this book really important, not just reasonable?
The original text contained 2 footnotes which were omitted from this narration.
---
First published:
September 20th, 2025
Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/voEAJ9nFBAqau8pNN/the-title-is-reasonable
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
…
continue reading
I think the title is reasonable.
I think the title is probably true – I'm less confident than Eliezer/Nate, but I don't think it's unreasonable for them to be confident in it given their epistemic state. (I also don't think it's unreasonable to feel less confident than me – it's a confusing topic that it's reasonable to disagree about.).
So I want to defend several decisions about the book I think were:
A) actually pretty reasonable from a meta-group-epistemics/comms perspective
B) very important to do.
I've heard different things from different people and maybe am drawing a cluster where there [...]
---
Outline:
(03:08) 1. Reasons the Everyone Dies thesis is reasonable
(03:14) What the book does and doesnt say
(06:47) The claims are presented reasonably
(13:24) 2. Specific points to maybe disagree on
(16:35) Notes on Niceness
(17:28) Which plan is Least Impossible?
(22:34) 3. Overton Smashing, and Hope
(22:39) Or: Why is this book really important, not just reasonable?
The original text contained 2 footnotes which were omitted from this narration.
---
First published:
September 20th, 2025
Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/voEAJ9nFBAqau8pNN/the-title-is-reasonable
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
625 حلقات
مشاركة
