المحتوى المقدم من Aaron Larson. يتم تحميل جميع محتويات البودكاست بما في ذلك الحلقات والرسومات وأوصاف البودكاست وتقديمها مباشرة بواسطة Aaron Larson أو شريك منصة البودكاست الخاص بهم. إذا كنت تعتقد أن شخصًا ما يستخدم عملك المحمي بحقوق الطبع والنشر دون إذنك، فيمكنك اتباع العملية الموضحة هنا https://ar.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - تطبيق بودكاست انتقل إلى وضع عدم الاتصال باستخدام تطبيق Player FM !
On this episode of Advances in Care , host Erin Welsh and Dr. Craig Smith, Chair of the Department of Surgery and Surgeon-in-Chief at NewYork-Presbyterian and Columbia discuss the highlights of Dr. Smith’s 40+ year career as a cardiac surgeon and how the culture of Columbia has been a catalyst for innovation in cardiac care. Dr. Smith describes the excitement of helping to pioneer the institution’s heart transplant program in the 1980s, when it was just one of only three hospitals in the country practicing heart transplantation. Dr. Smith also explains how a unique collaboration with Columbia’s cardiology team led to the first of several groundbreaking trials, called PARTNER (Placement of AoRTic TraNscatheteR Valve), which paved the way for a monumental treatment for aortic stenosis — the most common heart valve disease that is lethal if left untreated. During the trial, Dr. Smith worked closely with Dr. Martin B. Leon, Professor of Medicine at Columbia University Irving Medical Center and Chief Innovation Officer and the Director of the Cardiovascular Data Science Center for the Division of Cardiology. Their findings elevated TAVR, or transcatheter aortic valve replacement, to eventually become the gold-standard for aortic stenosis patients at all levels of illness severity and surgical risk. Today, an experienced team of specialists at Columbia treat TAVR patients with a combination of advancements including advanced replacement valve materials, three-dimensional and ECG imaging, and a personalized approach to cardiac care. Finally, Dr. Smith shares his thoughts on new frontiers of cardiac surgery, like the challenge of repairing the mitral and tricuspid valves, and the promising application of robotic surgery for complex, high-risk operations. He reflects on life after he retires from operating, and shares his observations of how NewYork-Presbyterian and Columbia have evolved in the decades since he began his residency. For more information visit nyp.org/Advances…
المحتوى المقدم من Aaron Larson. يتم تحميل جميع محتويات البودكاست بما في ذلك الحلقات والرسومات وأوصاف البودكاست وتقديمها مباشرة بواسطة Aaron Larson أو شريك منصة البودكاست الخاص بهم. إذا كنت تعتقد أن شخصًا ما يستخدم عملك المحمي بحقوق الطبع والنشر دون إذنك، فيمكنك اتباع العملية الموضحة هنا https://ar.player.fm/legal.
Throughout the years the Supreme Court has evolved much like the rest of the federal government. This would not be without landmark rulings, which will be the main focus of this podcast. Landmark rulings lay the groundwork for laws to be overturned or upheld and allow for the United States to work toward major goals. Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/aaron-larson2/support
المحتوى المقدم من Aaron Larson. يتم تحميل جميع محتويات البودكاست بما في ذلك الحلقات والرسومات وأوصاف البودكاست وتقديمها مباشرة بواسطة Aaron Larson أو شريك منصة البودكاست الخاص بهم. إذا كنت تعتقد أن شخصًا ما يستخدم عملك المحمي بحقوق الطبع والنشر دون إذنك، فيمكنك اتباع العملية الموضحة هنا https://ar.player.fm/legal.
Throughout the years the Supreme Court has evolved much like the rest of the federal government. This would not be without landmark rulings, which will be the main focus of this podcast. Landmark rulings lay the groundwork for laws to be overturned or upheld and allow for the United States to work toward major goals. Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/aaron-larson2/support
Dartmouth College v. Woodward serves as a quiet landmark decision, but employs precedence with regards to Fletcher v. Peck and Sturges v. Crowninshield to use Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution, commonly referred to as the Contracts Clause. Listen to learn more! --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/aaron-larson2/support…
In the biggest case since Marbury , the 1819 case of McCulloch v. Maryland offers up the first glimpse at the use of the Necessary and Proper Clause in the Supreme Court of the United States. Listen to see where Chief Justice John Marshall stands with regards to the use of a national bank. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/aaron-larson2/support…
The complexities in Sturges v. Crowninshield and Ogden v. Saunders are apparent as there is no clear majority decision to be made. Although both sides finally come to a consensus, it is not without some bargaining with regards to the combination of bankruptcy laws and constitutional laws in the United States. New York is the epicenter for these two major cases, and many questions arise out of state legislation they passed. Listen for more info! --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/aaron-larson2/support…
Although Chief Justice John Marshall had to recuse himself from this case for a conflict of interest, Martin v. Hunter's Lessee serves as a bright spot for the federal judiciary where they finally see that they can apply the acts of judicial review to entire state governments, not just the legislature or executive branches. While the case is pretty soundly cut and dry, there remains a lot of doubt about how to go about the decision. Listen to find out more! --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/aaron-larson2/support…
United States v. Hudson and Goodwin serves as the intersection between the Circuit Courts and the Supreme Court, as well as the intertwining of constitutional and criminal law. The case deals with libel against public officials in the Circuit Courts, but the Supreme Court has to answer one basic question: can federal courts hear a case where they have no jurisdiction in criminal, or common law, and the act is not deemed illegal by the U.S. Congress, nor the Constitution. Listen to learn more! --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/aaron-larson2/support…
Fletcher v. Peck represents the first use of judicial review by the Supreme Court with regards to state legislation. Listen to see how complicated a scenario we run into, and how Chief Justice John Marshall handles it for the Court. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/aaron-larson2/support…
John Marshall proved to be a very influential early politician in the United States, but his main legacy sits on the Supreme Court. As Chief Justice he had the ability to preside over many landmarks decisions, none more powerful than the case of Marbury v. Madison . Finally, judicial review comes into focus for the court, but not exactly in the way many imagined it would. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/aaron-larson2/support…
This episode represents the first official attempts at establishing some form of judicial review in the United States Supreme Court. In the first, Chisolm v. Georgia , we see this process fail, but in the latter, Hylton v. United States , we see quite the opposite. Both of these cases start an important process in the Federal government that ultimately comes in 1803 with Marbury v. Madison . --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/aaron-larson2/support…
This episode represents the first official docketed Supreme Court case in Van Staphorst v. Maryland , as well as the first official Supreme Court decision in West v. Barnes . While neither of these cases are really 'landmarks', they lay important groundwork in establishing the goals and ideals of the early federal court system. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/aaron-larson2/support…
Trailer for Landmark Decisions in the United States Supreme Court. Episodes will be released every Monday @ 8AM! --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/aaron-larson2/support
Before diving into landmark cases we must take a broad look at where the Supreme Court came from, and how the inferior courts came into being. We will do this through looking at the Article III of the United States Constitution, and the Judiciary Act of 1789. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/aaron-larson2/support…
مرحبًا بك في مشغل أف ام!
يقوم برنامج مشغل أف أم بمسح الويب للحصول على بودكاست عالية الجودة لتستمتع بها الآن. إنه أفضل تطبيق بودكاست ويعمل على أجهزة اندرويد والأيفون والويب. قم بالتسجيل لمزامنة الاشتراكات عبر الأجهزة.