المحتوى المقدم من Daniel Davis. يتم تحميل جميع محتويات البودكاست بما في ذلك الحلقات والرسومات وأوصاف البودكاست وتقديمها مباشرة بواسطة Daniel Davis أو شريك منصة البودكاست الخاص بهم. إذا كنت تعتقد أن شخصًا ما يستخدم عملك المحمي بحقوق الطبع والنشر دون إذنك، فيمكنك اتباع العملية الموضحة هنا https://ar.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - تطبيق بودكاست انتقل إلى وضع عدم الاتصال باستخدام تطبيق Player FM !
“That's taxpayer’s money that is going to support research and development and pilot projects to develop a food system that is based on environmental destruction and greed and disregard for animals, fish, and any of the other marine mammals that might be around it.” - Andrianna Natsoulas Andrianna Natsoulas is the campaign director for Don't Cage Our Oceans, an organization that exists to keep our oceans free from industrial fish farms. Offshore finfish farming is the mass cultivation of finfish in marine waters, in underwater or floating net pens, pods, and cages. Offshore finfish farms are factory farms that harm public health, the environment, and local communities and economies that rely on the ocean and its resources. Don’t Cage Our Oceans are a coalition of diverse organizations working together to stop the development of offshore finfish farming in the United States through federal law, policies, and coalition building. And, although it is not yet happening, right now the US Administration and Congress are promoting this kind of farming, which would be nothing short of disastrous for the oceans, the planet and the people and animals who live here. dontcageouroceans.org…
المحتوى المقدم من Daniel Davis. يتم تحميل جميع محتويات البودكاست بما في ذلك الحلقات والرسومات وأوصاف البودكاست وتقديمها مباشرة بواسطة Daniel Davis أو شريك منصة البودكاست الخاص بهم. إذا كنت تعتقد أن شخصًا ما يستخدم عملك المحمي بحقوق الطبع والنشر دون إذنك، فيمكنك اتباع العملية الموضحة هنا https://ar.player.fm/legal.
المحتوى المقدم من Daniel Davis. يتم تحميل جميع محتويات البودكاست بما في ذلك الحلقات والرسومات وأوصاف البودكاست وتقديمها مباشرة بواسطة Daniel Davis أو شريك منصة البودكاست الخاص بهم. إذا كنت تعتقد أن شخصًا ما يستخدم عملك المحمي بحقوق الطبع والنشر دون إذنك، فيمكنك اتباع العملية الموضحة هنا https://ar.player.fm/legal.
The presentation discusses the impact of the U.S. halting military aid and intelligence sharing with Ukraine, raising concerns about how long the Ukrainian army can hold out. It highlights that without American support, Ukraine’s military situation could deteriorate rapidly, with estimates suggesting that it could buckle within four months. However, the speaker argues that this might be overly optimistic due to the crucial role of morale in warfare. Former President Trump is portrayed as eager to end the war, viewing it as unwinnable and a distraction from larger geopolitical priorities. His administration has paused aid, and there are no plans to resume it. Trump has engaged in discussions with both Ukraine and Russia, signaling a push toward negotiations. Ukrainian President Zelensky initially resisted but later sent a letter suggesting readiness for talks. However, his subsequent public statements indicated continued reliance on European support and a commitment to military resistance, leading to doubts about his sincerity. The speaker contends that Russia, seeing Ukraine’s declining resources and morale, has no incentive to negotiate and is likely to press forward militarily. European nations are mentioned as continuing to support Ukraine, though their contributions have been inconsistent. The argument concludes that prolonging the conflict without a viable path to victory only results in unnecessary casualties and that Ukraine should recognize when to negotiate rather than persist in a losing battle. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .…
The presentation discusses President Trump's decision to pause military support for Ukraine and the potential consequences. Key points include: Reactions and Consequences: The halt in U.S. aid raises questions about Ukrainian President Zelensky's response, Moscow’s reaction, and how NATO and European leaders will proceed. Ukraine’s Survival Without U.S. Aid: The Washington Post suggests Ukraine can continue fighting but faces an uncertain future. Zelensky acknowledges the difficulty but insists Ukraine must keep fighting. U.S. Position Shift: The presentation argues that Ukraine cannot sustain the war without U.S. backing. European leaders acknowledge the need for American support. Trump's Stance: The former president is taking a clear and bold stance against prolonging the war, urging Ukraine to negotiate peace rather than continuing an unwinnable conflict. Comparison to Afghanistan: The withdrawal of U.S. support in Afghanistan led to rapid collapse, suggesting a similar fate for Ukraine’s armed forces if aid ceases. Psychological and Strategic Implications: Without U.S. backing, Ukrainian forces may lose morale and eventually collapse, either through battlefield losses or surrender. European Role: European nations support Ukraine but are unwilling to commit troops, providing only limited aid. Trump’s Ultimate Goal: Trump emphasizes peace, rejecting prolonged war efforts. He signals he won’t follow the policies of past U.S. administrations or European allies. Overall, the presentation argues that Trump’s decision marks a turning point, forcing Ukraine toward negotiations while highlighting the human cost of continued war. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .…
The presentation argues that Europe should align with the U.S. rather than attempt to dictate conditions on Russia, as doing otherwise would prolong the war in Ukraine. It highlights that the U.S., under the current administration, prioritizes its own national security interests, including withdrawing from conflicts deemed unprofitable. America sees greater strategic importance in issues like homeland security, the Middle East, China, and its own hemisphere, placing Europe lower on its list of priorities. The discussion critiques European attempts to influence U.S. policy and emphasizes that America, as the more powerful player, will act according to its own interests. It also questions Ukraine’s ability to win the war without U.S. support, suggesting that even with America’s backing, victory was always unlikely. The speaker criticizes Ukrainian President Zelensky's leadership, portraying him as strategically incompetent due to military losses and failed operations. Furthermore, the presentation critiques Western elites for oversimplifying the war narrative, portraying Zelensky as a hero and Putin as an absolute villain. It argues that this simplistic view has contributed to strategic missteps and a failure to seek an alternative path to avoid the ongoing tragedy. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .…
The presentation discusses the fallout from an explosion in the Oval Office the previous Friday and its impact on U.S. foreign policy, particularly regarding Ukraine and peace negotiations with Russia. The discussion, featuring Colonel Doug Gregor and other commentators, suggests that Europe is shifting closer to former President Trump’s stance and that economic agreements with Ukraine are contingent on a peace deal. Key points: The U.S. aims to pursue conflict resolution with or without Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Treasury Secretary emphasizes that economic deals depend on achieving peace first. Zelensky is accused of sabotaging negotiations, allegedly to prolong the war. The U.S. under Trump is moving toward negotiating directly with Russia. Russia's conditions for ending the war are clear, including recognizing occupied territories and ensuring Ukraine's neutrality. Some U.S. officials, such as Marco Rubio, are adjusting their stance, but Trump's advisors may still be obstructing decisive action. The U.S. is urged to cut military aid to Ukraine and withdraw American personnel to push for a resolution. Overall, the presentation argues that Zelensky is resisting peace efforts, the U.S. needs to take concrete actions to stop the war, and Russia is ready to negotiate under specific terms. Transcript See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .…
This presentation describes a major political confrontation that took place in the White House between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance, and former President Donald Trump. The incident has deeply polarized opinions, with some seeing Zelensky as a strong leader standing up to Trump, while others view him as ungrateful or out of line. The presentation argues that this confrontation was not a setup by Trump or Vance but rather an unexpected and escalating dispute. It highlights how tensions had been building, with Zelensky already on edge due to earlier remarks about his attire. During the meeting, Trump emphasized his desire to negotiate an end to the war and proposed a minerals deal as a form of security guarantee for Ukraine, a stance that Zelensky found unsatisfactory. The key moment of escalation occurred when Zelensky challenged Vance directly, questioning his understanding of diplomacy and calling him out by name. Vance, in turn, responded forcefully, leading to an intense exchange that caught U.S. and Ukrainian officials off guard. The presentation suggests that Zelensky missed multiple opportunities to de-escalate the situation. It also critiques Zelensky’s version of events, arguing that he selectively presented historical facts about Russia's aggression while omitting details about Ukraine’s own actions. The fallout from this clash is expected to have significant consequences, particularly regarding U.S.-Ukraine relations and the broader geopolitical landscape. The presentation concludes with a statement from Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who expresses disappointment in Zelensky’s handling of the situation. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .…
This presentation discusses Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s recent visit to the U.S. and his interactions with former President Donald Trump. The speakers critique Zelensky’s approach, arguing that he lacks leverage in negotiations and made missteps by engaging in confrontational exchanges with U.S. officials. They assert that Zelensky’s goal is to maintain U.S. support for the war, but that Trump is determined to cut aid and push for an end to the conflict. The discussion suggests that Zelensky’s visit was ineffective, as Trump's position on Ukraine remains unchanged—he wants to end the war quickly, which the speakers argue is in Ukraine’s best interest. They highlight that some officials in Kyiv are beginning to recognize that continuing the war is not a viable strategy. The speakers also emphasize that Ukraine is unlikely to win militarily, and that prolonging the war will only result in more casualties and territorial losses. Additionally, they mention Trump's firm stance, reportedly telling Zelensky, “We either make a deal or we’re out.” They also discuss potential fallout, particularly regarding financial and resource-related negotiations between the U.S. and Ukraine. The overall tone suggests skepticism about Zelensky’s strategy and support for Trump's approach to ending the war. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .…
This presentation discusses Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s recent visit to the U.S. and his interactions with former President Donald Trump. The speakers critique Zelensky’s approach, arguing that he lacks leverage in negotiations and made missteps by engaging in confrontational exchanges with U.S. officials. They assert that Zelensky’s goal is to maintain U.S. support for the war, but that Trump is determined to cut aid and push for an end to the conflict. The discussion suggests that Zelensky’s visit was ineffective, as Trump's position on Ukraine remains unchanged—he wants to end the war quickly, which the speakers argue is in Ukraine’s best interest. They highlight that some officials in Kyiv are beginning to recognize that continuing the war is not a viable strategy. The speakers also emphasize that Ukraine is unlikely to win militarily, and that prolonging the war will only result in more casualties and territorial losses. Additionally, they mention Trump's firm stance, reportedly telling Zelensky, “We either make a deal or we’re out.” They also discuss potential fallout, particularly regarding financial and resource-related negotiations between the U.S. and Ukraine. The overall tone suggests skepticism about Zelensky’s strategy and support for Trump's approach to ending the war. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .…
The presentation discusses the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war and the likelihood of a negotiated settlement. It highlights global perspectives, including those from Washington, Brussels, and Moscow, and raises questions about former President Trump's stance on Ukraine. Key points: Many stakeholders, including Kyiv, anticipate that the war will end soon with a negotiated resolution, but the details and winners/losers remain uncertain. Trump has made conflicting statements about ending the war "within weeks," but experts argue the complexity of the situation makes a swift resolution unlikely. The British and European leaders, including UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron, are pushing for continued Western support for Ukraine, aiming to integrate Ukraine into NATO and maintain U.S. engagement in European security. Trump's strategy appears focused on ending the war but without committing to NATO expansion or European-led peacekeeping efforts. European leaders fear losing U.S. support, as they lack the economic and military capacity to sustain Ukraine independently. There is growing internal debate in the UK, with some voices arguing against prolonging the conflict. The presentation concludes that while peace efforts are advancing, achieving a settlement will take time and careful negotiations, particularly with Russia's stance on security guarantees. Overall, the discussion emphasizes geopolitical tensions, differing priorities between the U.S. and Europe, and the potential obstacles to achieving a lasting peace. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .…
The discussion revolves around a critical minerals deal involving former President Trump and Ukrainian President Zelensky. The deal is nearing completion, with Trump stating that Zelensky will visit the White House to finalize it. However, tensions exist between the two leaders, with Trump labeling Zelensky a "dictator" and Zelensky accusing Trump of being influenced by Moscow. The negotiations have seen fluctuating figures, with Trump initially proposing $500 billion, later reduced to $350 billion, while Zelensky has denied such figures. The deal's complexity stems from the fact that many of Ukraine’s critical mineral reserves are in territories controlled by Russia, making the agreement's feasibility questionable. There are also concerns that Zelensky may have already promised mineral rights to British investors. Analysts suggest that Trump is overly confident about securing a deal, while Putin remains steadfast in his position, seeing no need for concessions. Furthermore, U.S. security guarantees for Ukraine are absent from the agreement, as any direct military involvement could escalate tensions with Russia. The conversation also touches on broader geopolitical implications, such as Russia’s economic leverage over the U.S. in areas like fertilizer and enriched uranium. Overall, the situation remains fluid, with ongoing diplomatic maneuvering, uncertainty over the deal’s legitimacy, and potential conflicts over resource control. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .…
The presentation discusses the geopolitical situation surrounding the Russia-Ukraine conflict as it enters its "final phase" and how this intersects with former U.S. President Donald Trump’s diplomatic stance. It highlights the broader diplomatic tensions beyond just the battlefield, raising the question of whether the real conflict is between Trump and Putin or Trump and Europe. The discussion features former British diplomat Ian Proud, who provides insights from his experience in Moscow. He describes how Russia has long voiced concerns over NATO expansion, dating back to 2008 and earlier, and how Western countries, particularly the U.K. and the U.S., ignored or dismissed these concerns. Proud argues that the West’s unwillingness to engage diplomatically, including sabotaging the Minsk II agreement, contributed to the eventual outbreak of war. Trump’s recent statements about resolving the war in weeks are contrasted with European leaders’ reluctance to shift their messaging. A speech by U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer is analyzed, where he frames Russia as an aggressive power but omits key historical context. The conversation also touches on Western propaganda, intelligence operations, and the decline of diplomacy in favor of military expansion. The presentation concludes by questioning the effectiveness of the U.K.’s planned increase in defense spending, noting that it pales in comparison to Russia’s military capabilities and is likely to be absorbed by inefficient procurement processes rather than tangible military gains. Transcript See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .…
The presentation discusses the contrasting approaches of Donald Trump and European leaders regarding the war in Ukraine. Trump and French President Emmanuel Macron met at the White House to discuss ways to end the conflict, with Trump having repeatedly promised to resolve it quickly. Initially, he claimed he could do it in a day, later extending the timeline to 100 days or a few weeks. Meanwhile, European leaders met in Kyiv, appearing more focused on prolonging the war rather than negotiating peace. A major obstacle to ending the war is Ukraine’s political situation. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky remains in power despite his mandate having expired, with the Ukrainian parliament reaffirming his position. However, Russia refuses to negotiate a peace deal until Ukraine holds elections. European leaders and NATO continue to push for military aid to Ukraine rather than exploring diplomatic solutions. The NATO Secretary General's rhetoric emphasizes supporting Ukraine militarily but does not outline a path to peace. The discussion highlights how European leaders, having invested significant political capital in supporting Ukraine, are unwilling to change course. There are concerns that abandoning the war effort could result in political instability and the rise of populist parties in Europe. The growing anti-Russian sentiment in Europe, partly fueled by U.S. narratives like "Russiagate," has persisted even as the U.S. shifts toward normalization with Moscow. The U.S. under Trump is adopting an "offshore balancing" strategy, where local allies handle conflicts while the U.S. provides indirect support. However, this strategy has historically been risky and difficult to implement. The presentation suggests that Europe is struggling to define what a "just and lasting peace" looks like, while the U.S. is shifting towards ending the war—potentially leaving Europe to manage the crisis alone. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .…
The presentation discusses the political and geopolitical developments surrounding Ukraine, NATO, and the Trump administration’s stance on the ongoing conflict with Russia. Key Points: Trump’s Position on NATO and Ukraine: Trump and his administration, including National Security Adviser Waltz, have made it clear that Ukraine joining NATO is "off the table." The U.S. will not commit to Article 5, meaning there will be no direct U.S. military intervention to defend Ukraine. Zelensky’s Political Standing and Negotiation Strategy: Trump’s team sees Zelensky as having no leverage in negotiations, especially given Ukraine’s dependence on U.S. aid. Russia refuses to negotiate with Zelensky, viewing him as an illegitimate leader since he has exceeded his term without holding elections. Trump has emphasized that Ukraine must hold elections and settle mineral resource deals for financial and military support. Ukraine’s Economic Resources and U.S. Investment Interests: There is an estimated $2-3 trillion in mineral resources in Ukraine, including titanium and gallium. The U.S. proposed a $500 billion investment deal, which Zelensky allegedly rejected, frustrating Trump and leading to strained relations. Trump’s Warning to Zelensky: Trump has criticized Zelensky, calling him a "modestly successful comedian" who "played Joe Biden like a fiddle." He warned that Ukraine could lose everything if negotiations do not move forward. Trump may withdraw all U.S. support, potentially forcing Ukraine to negotiate directly with Russia or rely solely on European allies. Implications for the War and Future of Ukraine: The war is nearing an end, either through a negotiated settlement or a disastrous collapse of Ukraine’s position due to lack of U.S. support. European leaders, including Macron and potentially a new German chancellor, may need to step in if the U.S. pulls back. Boris Johnson remains opposed to Trump's approach, continuing to support Ukraine unconditionally. Conclusion: The presentation argues that Zelensky is in a weak position and must compromise if Ukraine is to survive. Trump’s administration is prioritizing ending the war on U.S. terms, with economic and strategic interests taking precedence over military support. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .…
Danny's article from August 1, 2013 What it will take to fix the Army http://armedforcesjournal.com/purge-the-generals/ See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .
مرحبًا بك في مشغل أف ام!
يقوم برنامج مشغل أف أم بمسح الويب للحصول على بودكاست عالية الجودة لتستمتع بها الآن. إنه أفضل تطبيق بودكاست ويعمل على أجهزة اندرويد والأيفون والويب. قم بالتسجيل لمزامنة الاشتراكات عبر الأجهزة.