#87 - Visa Officers and the IAD Ignoring or Disagreeing with Federal Court, with Raj Sharma

Borderlines

المحتوى المقدم من Borderlines, Steven Meurrens, and Deanna Okun-Nachoff. يتم تحميل جميع محتويات البودكاست بما في ذلك الحلقات والرسومات وأوصاف البودكاست وتقديمها مباشرة بواسطة Borderlines, Steven Meurrens, and Deanna Okun-Nachoff أو شريك منصة البودكاست الخاص بهم. إذا كنت تعتقد أن شخصًا ما يستخدم عملك المحمي بحقوق الطبع والنشر دون إذنك، فيمكنك اتباع العملية الموضحة هنا https://ar.player.fm/legal.

1y ago 53:54

MP3•منزل الحلقة

Raj Sharma is an immigration lawyer in Calgary. In Borderlines Podcast Episode 69 we discussed his case Mohammad v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1, in which the Federal Court quashed an Immigration Appeal Division decision, stating that the IAD did not properly give enough weight to the unique contributions that Ms. Mohammad made as a health care worker during COVID-19, and the debt that was owed to her. The IAD disagreed with the Federal Court, and Raj Sharma sought judicial review again. The case, and today's episode, provides an insight into how redetermination works, and the degree of deference that visa officers and the IAD need to show the Federal Court.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

130 حلقات

#News #Steven Meurrens #Immigration #Society #Borderline #Deanna Okun-Nachoff