The California Appellate Law podcast

Player FM - Internet Radio Done Right

تمت الإضافة منذ قبل three أعوام

المحتوى المقدم من Tim Kowal & Jeff Lewis, Tim Kowal, and Jeff Lewis. يتم تحميل جميع محتويات البودكاست بما في ذلك الحلقات والرسومات وأوصاف البودكاست وتقديمها مباشرة بواسطة Tim Kowal & Jeff Lewis, Tim Kowal, and Jeff Lewis أو شريك منصة البودكاست الخاص بهم. إذا كنت تعتقد أن شخصًا ما يستخدم عملك المحمي بحقوق الطبع والنشر دون إذنك، فيمكنك اتباع العملية الموضحة هنا https://ar.player.fm/legal.

This Is Woman's Work with Nicole Kalil

1
Unlocking Your Hidden Genius: How to Harness Your Innate Talents with Betsy Wills & Alex Ellison | Ep. 289 32:08

منذ 8 weeks32:08

التشغيل لاحقا

قوائم

إعجاب

احب

32:08

Did you know there’s an actual science to uncovering your hidden genius? It’s not about filling out a “dream job” worksheet—it’s about understanding how your brain is wired, identifying your natural aptitudes, and using them to thrive. This isn’t just a self-discovery exercise. It’s a game-changer for your career, your relationships, and how you show up in the world. Betsy Wills and Alex Ellison are redefining how we approach career discovery, proving that finding the right path isn’t just about landing a job—it’s about creating a life that aligns with who you actually are. ✅ Betsy Wills – Cofounder of YouScience, a groundbreaking psychometric assessment platform reshaping how we understand our talents. She’s also the Director of Marketing & Branding at Diversified Trust and a frequent lecturer at Vanderbilt University and NYU’s Stern School of Business. ✅ Alex Ellison – Founder of Throughline Guidance, a global college and career counseling practice. She’s a sought-after writer, speaker, and expert in college readiness and career development. ✅ Together, they co-authored Your Hidden Genius: The Science-Backed Strategy to Uncovering and Harnessing Your Innate Talents. Discovering your hidden genius isn’t just about career success—it’s about tapping into what makes you, you . Connect with Betsy & Alex: Website (Free Downloads): www.yourhiddengenius.com Book: https://www.harpercollins.com/products/your-hidden-genius-elizabeth-m-willsalexandra-ellison Related Podcast Episodes: How To Be You, But Better with Olga Khazan | 288 Finding Purpose Through Human Design with Emma Dunwoody | 228 195 / Finding (And Using) Your Voice with Amy Green Smith Share the Love: If you found this episode insightful, please share it with a friend, tag us on social media, and leave a review on your favorite podcast platform! 🔗 Subscribe & Review: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Amazon Music…

The California Appellate Law Podcast

منزل السلاسل•Feed

An appellate law podcast for trial lawyers. Appellate specialists Jeff Lewis and Tim Kowal discuss timely trial tips and the latest cases and news coming from the California Court of Appeal and California Supreme Court.

169 حلقات

#Business #Tim Kowal & Jeff Lewis #Jeff Lewis #Tim Kowal #Law #Attorney #California #Supreme Court #Legal #Legal News #Appellate #Podcasting Education #News #Appeal #Lawyers

The California Appellate Law Podcast

updated منذ 8 أيام

منزل السلاسل•Feed

169 حلقات

#Business #Tim Kowal & Jeff Lewis #Jeff Lewis #Tim Kowal #Law #Attorney #California #Supreme Court #Legal #Legal News #Appellate #Podcasting Education #News #Appeal #Lawyers

Semua episode

1
Kidnapping, Pronouns & Dragons 28:24

منذ 8 أيام28:24

28:24

A civil litigant, hit with $200,000 sanctions for plotting the kidnapping and murder of the defendant, gets the sanctions reversed. Next week the California Supreme Court will hear oral argument on whether the state can mandate long-term care facility employees to use residents’ preferred pronouns. If this is consistent with the First Amendment, could conservative states mandate hospitals refer to fetuses as “unborn children”? The State Bar used AI to create bar exam questions. An attorney used a cartoon dragon watermark in his federal filing. And Jeff reports some tips from the recent San Francisco CLA/OCBA appellate conference. Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography , LinkedIn profile , and Twitter feed . Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography , LinkedIn profile , Twitter feed , and YouTube page . Sign up for Not To Be Published , Tim Kowal’s weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases . Other items discussed in the episode: Videos from this episode will be posted at Tim Kowal’s YouTube channel .…

1
Wait, challenging a vaccine mandate is a SLAPP?? 34:21

منذ 21 يومًا34:21

34:21

Apple said no jab, no job. The actor sued. The Court of Appeal holds the jab policy is expressive conduct, and thus the suit was a SLAPP. Apple Studios dropped an actor from its Manhunt miniseries over a COVID vaccine mandate. The actor sued. Apple filed an anti-SLAPP motion—and won. Jeff and Tim break down Sexton v. Apple Studios and ask: Is a vaccine mandate a creative decision? Do logistical decisions become “expressive” just because they are part of making a film? The court held that following “contemporary conventional wisdom” was reasonable, but what happens when that wisdom was arrived at suddenly in a matter of a few months—and then is abandoned just as suddenly? And recall past “contemporary conventional wisdom” that is now abandoned: smoking was safe (even good for you!); thalidomide was good for pregnant women; Fen-Phen and Vioxx were promoted. Tim notes that much medical orthodoxy has a short shelf life and the law needs to allow room for individual choice. Jeff notes that in emergency situations the law needs to defer to coalescing expert opinion and best practices. We discuss, you decide. Also: A pro se litigant tricks a New York court into letting his AI avatar argue for him. (Spoiler: it did not go well.) Plus, updates on shadow docket misadventures and deportation do-overs. Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography , LinkedIn profile , and Twitter feed . Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography , LinkedIn profile , Twitter feed , and YouTube page . Sign up for Not To Be Published , Tim Kowal’s weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases . Other items discussed in the episode: Apple’s mandatory vaccine is “creative” expression—employee’s lawsuit held a SLAPP…

1
Does “Of Counsel” have Rule 11 duties? 29:33

منذ 5 weeks29:33

29:33

Alan Dershowitz signed a complaint containing frivolous allegations in Kerri Lake v. Gates. But he’s only “of counsel” who reviewed one paragraph, containing nothing frivolous. So the panel reversed the Rule 11 sanctions—but warns that, going forward, “of counsel” is not a valid defense. Judge Bumatay writes separately to say it should be. Jeff agrees with the majority, but Tim raises a possible chilling effect for trial consultants and appellate counsel—does one bad banana expose the entire trial team to sanctions? Also: Is judicial impeachment a real threat or just cable-news cosplay? Discovery fee awards aren’t sanctions unless the judge calls it a sanction. A SLAPP fee order isn't separately appealable—even if it feels like it should be. Teaser for next week: Sexton v. Apple Studios —where vaccine mandates, historical drama, and anti-SLAPP collide. Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography , LinkedIn profile , and Twitter feed . Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography , LinkedIn profile , Twitter feed , and YouTube page . Sign up for Not To Be Published , Tim Kowal’s weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases . Other items discussed in the episode: You can appeal discovery sanctions, but not a mere cost allocation Can an attorney sign as to only part of a pleading? Are articles of impeachment "attacks" on judicial independence? Appealability of SLAPP Fee Orders…

1
CALP-March Cases & Tidbits: Judge Van Dyke’s video dissent 27:12

منذ 6 weeks27:12

27:12

Judge VanDyke made a YouTube video to accompany his dissent in Duncan v. Bonta , the Second Amendment case in which a Ninth Circuit en banc panel upheld California’s ban on handgun magazines over 10 bullets. Judge VanDyke’s video shows him disassembling a gun, comparing accessories, and using a portion of oral argument to claim his point wasn’t being heard. The issue: If a magazine is just an accessory not entitled to Second Amendment protection, then basically the entire gun is just a bunch of unprotected accessories. Jeff and Tim react: Can a federal judge issue a TikTok-style dissent? If so, can lawyers start footnoting their briefs with YouTube links? Does a video “illustration” that relies on props cross the line into new fact-finding? Or is it just illustrative of a legal point about distinguish an “arm” from its “accessories”? Are judges likely to do more of these dissents? Maybe explainer videos would be useful in patent cases (comparing iPhone and Samsung phone designs), or product defects, or police excessive-force cases? And practical questions: Will the video—and transcript—show up in Westlaw searches? How do you cite to something side during a dissent video? We also discuss a California Supreme Court ruling clarifying that malicious prosecution claims, even against lawyers, get the full two-year statute of limitations. Not the shorter one-year. And finally, an update from the J&J v. Trump litigation saga: a judge opens with a warning about the “priceless” nature of attorney integrity. The administration then invoked state secrets. Contempt proceedings now loom. Stay tuned. Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography , LinkedIn profile , and Twitter feed . Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography , LinkedIn profile , Twitter feed , and YouTube page . Sign up for Not To Be Published , Tim Kowal’s weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases . Other items discussed in the episode: Video Dissent: https://bsky.app/profile/rmfifthcircuit.bsky.social/post/3lkt7yftgqc2g…

1
Did Trump Violate the Deportation Order? 34:55

منذ 7 weeks34:55

34:55

A federal judge ordered the Trump administration not to deport five plaintiffs, alleged MS-13 and Tren de Aragua Venezuelan gang members. The administration complied, but then the judge verbally ordered the administration to turn around a plane and return 261 non-party alleged gang members. The administration didn’t do so, and appealed. Meanwhile, the President tweeted that the judge should be impeached. In response, the Chief Justice said that’s not how we do things. Jeff and Tim react: Is the President’s determination that the deportees are part of an “invasion or predatory incursion” affiliated with a foreign nation a political question, and thus nonjusticiable? If so, can the President just ship off Rachel Maddow without judicial review? Was it irregular for 261 non-party alleged gang members to get added to a TRO after an oral motion and no opportunity for briefing? Was it wise for the court to create a contest between the court and the presidency by verbally demanding planes turn around? Was it wise for the President to tweet in protest against the judge? (To the former: it’s arguable. To the latter: certainly not.) We then discuss how you can lose your right to appellate fees for being uncivil. And if you are uncivil, does the court expect you to apologize? Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography , LinkedIn profile , and Twitter feed . Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography , LinkedIn profile , Twitter feed , and YouTube page . Sign up for Not To Be Published , Tim Kowal’s weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases . Other items discussed in the episode: Videos from this episode will be posted at Tim Kowal’s YouTube channel .…

1
Audio clips at trial & oral argument tips 19:45

منذ 8 weeks19:45

19:45

Even if you technically can’t use an electronic recording to create the appellate record, trial courts do provide them for us in your closing argument PowerPoint. Jeff shares his experience. And after spending most of a morning watching oral arguments waiting for his case, Jeff offers these tips: It took 20 minutes of argument time just for the panel to get its head around who was who in a case full of alphabet-soup entities. If you’re spending a third of oral argument time in front of a confused panel, you’re doing it wrong. Try this: If your case has lots of “ABC LLCs” and “ABC Holdings LLCs,” try using functional names instead—like “the management company,” and “the holding company,” "investor", "bank", "assignee," etc. Anticipate this confusion in your briefs. Include a clear chart in the brief that helps track the parties, preferably directly in the brief or as a supplemental exhibit. The goal is to reduce "friction." If you’ve used up all panel’s brain synapses just to understand the players, you’re going to have a poor time once you get to the merits. We also get to a couple cases, including a trap on appellate briefing extensions. Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography , LinkedIn profile , and Twitter feed . Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography , LinkedIn profile , Twitter feed , and YouTube page . Sign up for Not To Be Published , Tim Kowal’s weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases . Other items discussed in the episode: Are employees immune from paying discovery fees? A stipulated dismissal is appealable, but not a voluntary dismissal?…

1
Beware using the Judicial Council form dismissal 11:22

منذ 9 weeks11:22

11:22

Here’s a trap door to avoid: if you are trying to expedite an appeal by dismissing remaining claims, do not use the Judicial Council dismissal form. Instead, you need a judge-signed dismissal. While Jeff is still in trial, Tim covers Maniago v. Desert Cardiology Consultants' Medical Group, Inc. (Jan. 30, 2025, No. D085025) 2025 WL 617972. The plaintiff dismissed his remaining claims after his core theory was gutted on demurrer, but the Court of Appeal held that a voluntary dismissal using the Judicial Council form is not an appealable order. If you are an appellate specialist and trial counsel asks how to expedite an appeal after a devastating interlocutory ruling, you’ll need to know about this trap door in Maniago , as well as the right way forward in Tos v. State (2021) 72 Cal.App.5th 184. And if you understand why a voluntary dismissal using the Judicial Council form is not appealable, but a voluntary dismissal using pleading paper is, then please volunteer to come on the podcast to explain it to the rest of us! Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography , LinkedIn profile , and Twitter feed . Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography , LinkedIn profile , Twitter feed , and YouTube page . Sign up for Not To Be Published , Tim Kowal’s weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases . Other items discussed in the episode: Maniago v. Desert Cardiology Consultants' Medical Group, Inc. (Jan. 30, 2025, No. D085025) 2025 WL 617972 Tos v. State (2021) 72 Cal.App.5th 184 Kurwa v. Kislinger (2017) 4 Cal.5th 109 (writeup here )…

1
Is the electronic-recording ban unconstitutional? 23:15

منذ 10 weeks23:15

23:15

All eyes are on the electronic-recording original proceeding in the Supreme Court, Family Violence Appellate Panel v. Superior Court , and the Court’s recent order to show cause why, when a court reporter can’t be found, California’s trial courts should not be ordered to hit the “record” button. This could this be the most significant advancement in electronic court recording in decades. But it raises a few questions: ❔ The remedy sought is limited to low-income litigants. But if the Court buys the equal-protection arguments, won’t it require a holding for all Californians? ❔ Will the Superior Courts oppose the relief? LA Superior Court, after all, already issued a local rule allowing electronic recordings. ❓ Will the Legislature oppose? To the contrary, Jeff makes a bold prediction that the Legislature, to avoid embarrassment, will amend or abolish Gov. Code § 69957 before the Court rules. ⁉️ Will the court reporter lobby oppose? Is opposition possible without appearing villainous? Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography , LinkedIn profile , and Twitter feed . Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography , LinkedIn profile , Twitter feed , and YouTube page . Sign up for Not To Be Published , Tim Kowal’s weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases . Other items discussed in the episode: Is the electronic-recording ban unconstitutional? Family Violence Appellate Project v. Superior Court (no. S288176 ) J ameson v. Desta (2018)…

1
ChatGPT Fails, Sanctions & Disbarments, Feb. 2025 35:54

منذ 11 weeks35:54

35:54

Please AI responsibly: Attorneys at a major law firm are making use of ChatGPT. That's not a bad thing normally, but filling in legal cites is not what it's for. The unchecked ChatGPT cases were fake at a rate of 8 out of 9 total cases in a single brief. On this recent legal news episode Jeff and Tim cover: How to AI responsibly (and not get sanctioned). How to challenge arbitration responsibly (and not get sanctioned). How to anti-SLAPP responsibly (and not get sanctioned). Recent court stats and rule updates. Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography , LinkedIn profile , and Twitter feed . Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography , LinkedIn profile , Twitter feed , and YouTube page . Sign up for Not To Be Published , Tim Kowal’s weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases . Other items discussed in the episode: AI Hallucinations May Lead to Sanctions for Big PI Law firm**.** Changes coming to Legal Specialization Board? Plantations at Haywood 1, LLC v. Plantations at Haywood, LLC *Wash v. Banda-Wash - 40 day period to claim costs after appeal not extended by 2 days - we are sent remands, we are not served with remands* Filmore Center Associates v. Lewis; San Francisco Superior Court Disbarred in Federal Court, But Welcome in State Court? Frivolous anti-SLAP…

1
Is California’s 30-day pay-or-waive arbitration rule preempted by the FAA? The split widens 15:08

منذ 12 weeks15:08

15:08

Your check for arbitration fees gets delayed in the mail. Under a particularly harsh pay-or-waive provision of the California Arbitration Act, if your fee is received on day 31, too bad—your arbitration rights go Poof! Or do they? There’s currently a big split among the appellate courts on this. Tim goes solo while Jeff is still in trial, covering several of the recent cases on both sides of the split. Does your arb agreement incorporate the FAA? You might be well-poised to argue it preempts the FAA. Or is the arb agreement silent on FAA, or include only a qualified reference? You’re on shakier ground. There’s also a separation of powers concern: Can the legislature declare that late arbitration fee payments automatically equal a waiver of arbitration rights, or is that a judicial function? Waiver is a common-law doctrine, and it’s discretionary. But clearly that’s not how the legislature intends it. And waiver requires fact-finding of the parties’ intentions in a particular case—obviously the Legislature doesn’t know what some future litigant in some future scenario “intends.” Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography , LinkedIn profile , and Twitter feed . Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography , LinkedIn profile , Twitter feed , and YouTube page . Sign up for Not To Be Published , Tim Kowal’s weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases . Other items discussed in the episode: Late payment does not defeat arbitration because that CAA rule is preempted by FAA—but Justice Baker dissents (May 30, 2024) Yet another arbitration preemption case, with 1st Dist. holding CAA’s 30-day deadline survives Another late arbitration payment case, again holding the FAA preempts the CAA Hernandez v. Sohnen Enters. (D2d5 May 22, 2024 No. B323303) [cert. for pub.] (rev. granted in Hohenshelt) Keeton v. Tesla, Inc. (D1d1 Jun. 26, 2024 No. A166690) (mentioned here )…

1
The court recorded my trial, so why can’t I use it on appeal? 29:54

منذ 13 weeks29:54

29:54

The San Bernardino Superior Court electronically records trial. Can Jeff use the recording as the appellate record? Short answer: no. But there’s an original writ pending in the Supreme Court on a similar issue, so watch this space. We also cover: Jury Fee Hike, Paid by State Fund—but for how long? Shehi v. Chicago Title Insurance Co. —attorney disqualification is appealable, but expert witness exclusion isn't, even when the expert is an attorney. Tom Girardi saga—Wife Erica Girardi held not liable for aiding and abetting her husband's client trust fund misconduct. The Fifth Amendment & Privilege Logs – A Ninth Circuit case on self-incrimination and privilege log requirements. Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography , LinkedIn profile , and Twitter feed . Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography , LinkedIn profile , Twitter feed , and YouTube page . Sign up for Not To Be Published , Tim Kowal’s weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases . Other items discussed in the episode: Attorney DQ Orders Are Appealable, But Not for Attorney Expert Witnesses Audio recording in San Bernardino and Court Reporters Finn v. Girardi (2D5d. Jan. 28, 2025, No. B324878) (nonpub. opn.). In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (9th Cir., Jan. 28, 2025, No. 24-2506)…

1
$340k Incivility Tax & Other Cases 11:34

منذ 14 weeks11:34

11:34

Jeff is in trial, so take in a few quick summaries of recent cases and get back to billing: Incivility cost attorney $340,000 in fee reduction. Clip-n-save the recent controlling case on this point, Karton v. Ari Design & Construction, Inc. : "Excellent lawyers deserve higher fees, and excellent lawyers are civil.” Don’t let the trial court deny relief before you’ve asked for it. Lost the CCP 998 bet? You can still get judgment-enforcement fees. Infamous sterlization case Buck v. Bell (”three generations of imbeciles are enough”) has never been formally overruled, and the California Court of Appeal still gives the mentally disabled mere rational basis. Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography , LinkedIn profile , and Twitter feed . Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography , LinkedIn profile , Twitter feed , and YouTube page . Sign up for Not To Be Published , Tim Kowal’s weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases . Other items discussed in the episode: Court cannot deny fees until a motion is made Headnotes Jan. 24, 2025: one-sentence summaries of this week’s below-the-fold cases Incivility Fee Reduction of $340k! The Court of Appeal says that rational basis review applies to mentally disabled.…

1
Movie-Trailer Case Reviews 25:22

منذ 15 weeks25:22

25:22

There was a bit in an old radio show (Kevin-and-Bean KROQ old, not Little Orphan Annie old) had Ralph Garman review movies he’d never seen, based only on watching the trailers. In this episode, we review some cases we haven’t read. We discuss the cases below, which lead to some good tangents. When discovery objections have been waived, does serving responses that still contain the waived objections count as “substantial compliance”? Trial court said no, but the correct answer is Yes, says Katayama v. Cont'l Inv. Grp. (D4d3 Oct. 9, 2024 No. G063872) [published]. Discussing the difference between waiver and forfeiture. N. Am. Title Co. v. The Superior Court. (Cal. Oct. 28, 2024 No. S280752). Satisfying judgment renders appeal moot: In Baker Entm't, LLC v. Emmett Furla Oasis Films, LLC . (2D7d Oct. 28, 2024. No. B323388) (nonpub. opn.) Failing to respond to demand for punitive damages information, defendant forfeited its challenge to $15M punitives award. ( Mosley v. Pacifica Bakersfield, L.P. (D5 Sep. 19, 2024 No. F084699) (nonpub. opn.). To Avoid Unjust Result, Unambiguous Statute Held Ambiguous. In re Marriage of Cady and Gamick (D2d1 Sep. 25, 2024 No. B326716) Other items discussed in the episode: Headnotes 11/21/24: Judge Bias Can Be Forfeited But Not Defective Service Late objections to RFAs do not invalidate otherwise substantive responses Headnotes: one-sentence summaries of this week’s below-the-fold cases…

1
TikTok at the Supreme Court & Oral Argument Stories 26:23

منذ 16 weeks26:23

26:23

This is why your teenagers are anxious: TikTok’s fate hangs in the balance at the Supreme Court. We discuss the recent oral arguments, and Donald Trump’s amicus brief asking the Court to sit tight and he’ll make a fantastic deal that will be fantastic and make the Court very happy and everyone will be very happy. (That is the best Trump impression I can do in written form 🤷). And what does it mean when the Court of Appeal decided an appeal based on what one attorney does—and the other attorney doesn’t do—at oral argument? We discuss *Pollock v. Kelso * where the court decides that the plaintiff is the previaling party according to a settlement….a settlement the court has never seen. We also cover Blauser v. Dubin discussing what to do when the trial court does not issue a final appealable order. Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography , LinkedIn profile , and Twitter feed . Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography , LinkedIn profile , Twitter feed , and YouTube page . Sign up for Not To Be Published , Tim Kowal’s weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases . Other items discussed in the episode: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynzTXuORJwM **Appellate court criticizes trial court practice of failing to enter final appealable orders Blauser v. Dubin ** (4D3d Nov. 19, 2024 No. G063715). **No reporter’s transcript of attorneys’ fees hearing doomed this appeal Saydman v. Aegis Sec. Ins. Co. ** (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 20, 2024 No. G063209) (nonpub. opn.)…

1
Roundup of 2024 and What’s Coming in 2025 25:42

منذ 17 weeks25:42

25:42

Here is our 2024 roundup, and in exchange we have a request for suggestions for 2025 content. If you are an attorney, what content do you prefer? Check out the poll . Now here’s the roundup of updates for 2025: 📅 MSJ Deadlines Are Updated: Remember 81-20-11. With the MSJ hearing as the target, motions must be filed beforehand 81 days, oppositions 20 days, and replies 11 days. 🥈 Making a 2nd attempt at an MSJ? You’ll need leave of court. ⌨️ The court reporter shortage is before the Supreme Court. Stay tuned. Here’s the roundup of notable cases from 2024: Biden admin takes aim at judges issuing sweeping nationwide injunctions. (But Tim asks: then who will take aim at federal authorities exercising sweeping nationwide powers?) Will anti-SLAPPs still be a thing in the Ninth Circuit by the end of 2025? Stay tuned for updates from the en banc panel in Martinez v. ZoomInfo Techs. The appellate courts continued to crack down on attorney incivility, with the court vowing that offending attorneys “will be called out and immortalized in the California Appellate Reports.” Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography , LinkedIn profile , and Twitter feed . Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography , LinkedIn profile , Twitter feed , and YouTube page . Sign up for Not To Be Published , Tim Kowal’s weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases . Other items discussed in the episode: Videos from this episode will be posted at Tim Kowal’s YouTube channel . Amendments to California's Motion for Summary Judgment Statute : Assembly Bill 2049 Text : Official legislative text detailing the changes effective January 1, 2025. Client Alert: New Summary Judgment Law in California Effective January 1, 2025 : An overview of the new law and its implications. New Changes to California's Summary Judgment Process: What You Need to Know : Insights into how the amendments will affect litigation strategies. Court Reporter Shortage and Audio Recording in Courtrooms : California Courts - Newsroom: Updates and news releases from the California judicial branch. Supreme Court Arguments on TikTok's Foreign Ownership and Nationwide Injunctions : SCOTUSblog : Comprehensive coverage of upcoming Supreme Court cases and arguments. Civility in Legal Practice : Masimo Corporation v. The Vanderpool Law Firm Case Summary : Details of the case addressing issues of civility and discovery sanctions. The Uncivil War Raging Before the Cali…

مرحبًا بك في مشغل أف ام!

يقوم برنامج مشغل أف أم بمسح الويب للحصول على بودكاست عالية الجودة لتستمتع بها الآن. إنه أفضل تطبيق بودكاست ويعمل على أجهزة اندرويد والأيفون والويب. قم بالتسجيل لمزامنة الاشتراكات عبر الأجهزة.