7/21/21 - Washington Supreme Court Says Termination of a Contract, Not for Default, Equals a Termination for Convenience

The Briefing with Smith Freed Eberhard

Player FM - Internet Radio Done Right

تمت الإضافة منذ قبل three أعوام

المحتوى المقدم من Smith Freed Eberhard. يتم تحميل جميع محتويات البودكاست بما في ذلك الحلقات والرسومات وأوصاف البودكاست وتقديمها مباشرة بواسطة Smith Freed Eberhard أو شريك منصة البودكاست الخاص بهم. إذا كنت تعتقد أن شخصًا ما يستخدم عملك المحمي بحقوق الطبع والنشر دون إذنك، فيمكنك اتباع العملية الموضحة هنا https://ar.player.fm/legal.

All About Change

1
Chris Nowinski - Protecting Athletes from Head Injuries & Preventing CTE 27:28

منذ 5 أيام27:28

التشغيل لاحقا

قوائم

إعجاب

احب

27:28

Chris Nowinski is a former football player at Harvard University and professional wrestler with WWE, World Wrestling Entertainment. After enduring a career-ending head injury, Chris has dedicated his professional life to serving patients and families affected by brain trauma, particularly Chronic traumatic encephalopathy, or CTE, a progressive neurodegenerative disease that develops after repeated head injuries. Jay and Chris discuss the state of head injuries in American athletics, the difference between advocating for head safety at youth and professional levels, Chris’ newest research, and much more. Episode Chapters (00:00) Intro (00:50) changes in the culture around concussions in the past two decades (02:39) padded helmet technology (03:55) concussion reporting in the NFL (10:35) Chris’ career path and concussion history (14:52) connecting with activists who haven’t themselves suffered a traumatic brain injury (17:42) SHAAKE - a new sign to identify concussions (20:53) Unions can help players advocate for safety policies (23:10) final thoughts and goodbye For video episodes, watch on www.youtube.com/@therudermanfamilyfoundation Stay in touch: X: @JayRuderman | @RudermanFdn LinkedIn: Jay Ruderman | Ruderman Family Foundation Instagram: All About Change Podcast | Ruderman Family Foundation To learn more about the podcast, visit https://allaboutchangepodcast.com/…

منذ 4 أعوام 10:55

M4A•منزل الحلقة

In this week's episode, Justin Wickizer, Director of Legal Operations, discusses Smith Freed Eberhard's latest Legal Alert, "Washington Supreme Court Says Termination of a Contract, Not for Default, Equals a Termination for Convenience."

Here, the Washington Supreme Court illustrates how the standard specifications incorporated into the subject contract –between a contractor and the City of Puyallup –automatically converts an improper termination for default into a termination for convenience and the financial impact of the same.

25 حلقات

#Business #Smith Freed Eberhard

7/21/21 - Washington Supreme Court Says Termination of a Contract, Not for Default, Equals a Termination for Convenience

The Briefing with Smith Freed Eberhard

published منذ 4 أعوام

M4A•منزل الحلقة

25 حلقات

#Business #Smith Freed Eberhard

كل الحلقات

1
Spoiler Alert! Spoliation Combined with Discovery Violations Are Sanctionable by Default Judgment 11:23

منذ 3 years11:23

11:23

1
When Underlying Conditions Don’t Automatically Prove Causation 9:26

منذ 3 years9:26

9:26

1
Au Contraire: Even the Smallest Contradictions in Deposition Testimony Can Make or Break a Case 8:41

منذ 3 years8:41

8:41

1
Arbitration Agreements Trump Elder Care 8:08

منذ 3 years8:08

8:08

1
It’s All in The Fine Print – Are Arbitration Clauses Unconscionable and Do They Apply Retroactively? 15:22

منذ 3 years15:22

15:22

Welcome to The Briefing - a legal podcast by Smith Freed Eberhard. We will provide insight and analysis on new Oregon and Washington case law, litigation innovation and technology, the insurance marketplace, and firm news. In this week's episode Partner Gordon Klug discusses Smith Freed Eberhard's latest Legal Alert, "It’s All in The Fine Print – Are Arbitration Clauses Unconscionable and Do They Apply Retroactively?". The Washington Court of Appeals held that the trial court erred in denying a motion to compel arbitration without first having an evidentiary hearing, because the facts were insufficient to support a finding that the arbitration agreement was unconscionable.…

1
First-Party Bad Faith in Oregon? Are the floodgates about to open? Violations of the Oregon Insurance Code Held to Give Rise to the Pursuit of Emotional Distress Damages 14:13

منذ 3 years14:13

14:13

Welcome to The Briefing – a legal podcast by Smith Freed Eberhard. We will provide insight and analysis on new Oregon and Washington case law, litigation innovation and technology, the insurance marketplace, and firm news. In this week’s episode Partner Cliff Wilson discusses Smith Freed Eberhard’s latest Legal Alert, “First-Party Bad Faith in Oregon? Are the floodgates about to open? Violations of the Oregon Insurance Code Held to Give Rise to the Pursuit of Emotional Distress Damages”. The Oregon Court of Appeals has recently held that a negligence per se claim brought by an insured based on alleged violations of Oregon’s Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Statute (ORS 746.230) can give rise to emotional distress damages against an insurer who denied coverage.…

1
Airbnb and Hot Tub Liability: Read This Before Your Next Vacation 9:41

منذ 3 years9:41

9:41

1
Silence Isn't Always Golden 9:20

منذ 3 years9:20

9:20

1
Insurers Downwind of Lawyer Theft: Must Send Notice Directly To Claimant Whenever They Settle Their Claim 7:27

منذ 3 years7:27

7:27

1
Have You or A Loved One Been Exposed to Damages Inconsistent with the Pleading? 9:30

منذ 3 years9:30

9:30

The Court of Appeals held that a plaintiff does not need to produce evidence that shows the plaintiff was exposed to the asbestos-containing product at a particular time and location. Rather, a plaintiff only needs to provide evidence sufficient for a jury to believe exposure occurred. Further, the Court found that a jury can award damages based on the largest numbers that appear in the Complaint—even if the damages alleged in the body of the Complaint do not total the prayed for amount. The Court placed responsibility on defendants to clarify typos or inconsistencies in a plaintiff’s pleading to mitigate any increased damage exposure that may result.…

1
A Costly Miscalculation. Oregon Court of Appeals Finds that Multiple Defendants' Separate Settlement Offers May Not be Aggregated when Determining Whether to Award Attorney Fees Under ORS 20.080 13:59

منذ 3 years13:59

13:59

Welcome to The Briefing - a legal podcast by Smith Freed Eberhard. We will provide insight and analysis on new Oregon and Washington case law, litigation innovation and technology, the insurance marketplace, and firm news. In this week's episode Cliff Wilson, Partner, discusses Smith Freed Eberhard's latest Legal Alert, A costly miscalculation. Oregon Court of Appeals Finds that Multiple Defendants' Separate Settlement Offers May Not be Aggregated when Determining Whether to Award Attorney Fees Under ORS 20.080". This case highlights how important it is to consider how a Court might calculate the amount of an Offer of Judgment against multiple defendants, when those defendants had previously made separate pre-filing settlement offers.…

1
11/23/21 - Love Thy Neighbor, but Don't Ignore Your Property Rights 10:05

منذ 3 years10:05

10:05

1
10/20/21 - Oregon Supreme Court Allows UM/UIM Stacking Among Multiple Policies Issued by Same Insurer 12:12

منذ 3 years12:12

12:12

Welcome to The Briefing - a legal podcast by Smith Freed Eberhard. We will provide insight and analysis on new Oregon and Washington case law, litigation innovation and technology, the insurance marketplace, and firm news. In this week's episode, Cliff Wilson, a Partner in the Oregon office, discusses Smith Freed Eberhard's latest Legal Alert, "Oregon Supreme Court Allows UM/UIM Stacking Among Multiple Policies Issued by Same Insurer". In this case, the Oregon Supreme Court determined that an anti-stacking provision in an uninsured/underinsured (UM/UIM) policy was unenforceable, holding that any attempt to limit the amount of UM/UIM coverage from multiple applicable policies to the policy limit of just one of them through an “other similar coverage” provision was less favorable to the insured than allowed by Oregon’s statutory UM/UIM model policy language.…

1
9/30/21 - The Third Time's the Charm. Oregon Supreme Court Examines Wright III to Explain the Difference Between Fault and Causation in an Underinsured Motorist Claim 15:29

منذ 3 years15:29

15:29

Welcome to The Briefing - a legal podcast by Smith Freed Eberhard. We will provide insight and analysis on new Oregon and Washington case law, litigation innovation and technology, the insurance marketplace, and firm news. In this week's episode, Cliff Wilson, a Partner in the Oregon office, discusses Smith Freed Eberhard's latest Legal Alert, "The Third Times the Charm. Oregon Supreme Court Examines Wright III to Explain the Difference Between Fault and Causation in an Underinsured Motorist Claim". In this case, the Oregon Supreme Court ultimately decided that (1) the underlying liability of the negligent drivers did not determine the limits of Plaintiff’s UIM coverage; (2) the jury could properly conclude that it could not apportion damages between two accidents; and (3) the jury was permitted, but not required, to find that both accidents caused Plaintiff’s injuries under settled principles of causation.…

1
9/16/21 - Words Heard Beyond the Grave: Washington Appellate Court Determines When a Deceased Party’s Statements Are Admissible 10:05

منذ 3 years10:05

10:05

Welcome to The Briefing - a legal podcast by Smith Freed Eberhard. We will provide insight and analysis on new Oregon and Washington case law, litigation innovation and technology, the insurance marketplace, and firm news. In this week's episode, Abby Ferguson, Marketing Manager, discusses Smith Freed Eberhard's latest Legal Alert, "Words Heard Beyond the Grave. Washington Appellate Court Determines When a Deceased Party's Statements Are Admissible". The Washington Appellate Court concluded that post trial statements made by a party to a case before his death are a “statement by a party opponent”; which is an exception to the hearsay rule.…

مرحبًا بك في مشغل أف ام!

يقوم برنامج مشغل أف أم بمسح الويب للحصول على بودكاست عالية الجودة لتستمتع بها الآن. إنه أفضل تطبيق بودكاست ويعمل على أجهزة اندرويد والأيفون والويب. قم بالتسجيل لمزامنة الاشتراكات عبر الأجهزة.

الاستماع إلى +500 موضوع

Apple Watch Series 10 [GPS 46mm case] Smartwatch with Jet Black Aluminium Case with Black Sport Band - M/L. Fitness Tracker, ECG App, Always-On Retina Display, Water Resistant

Apple AirPods Pro 2 Wireless Earbuds, Active Noise Cancellation, Hearing Aid Feature, Bluetooth Headphones, Transparency, Personalized Spatial Audio, High-Fidelity Sound, H2 Chip, USB-C Charging

Amazon Fire TV Stick 4K (newest model) with AI-powered Fire TV Search, Wi-Fi 6, stream over 1.5 million movies and shows, free & live TV

المدونة الصوتية تستحق الاستماع

The Briefing with Smith Freed Eberhard « » 7/21/21 - Washington Supreme Court Says Termination of a Contract, Not for Default, Equals a Termination for Convenience

7/21/21 - Washington Supreme Court Says Termination of a Contract, Not for Default, Equals a Termination for Convenience

المدونة الصوتية تستحق الاستماع

مرحبًا بك في مشغل أف ام!

Clean Skin Club Clean Towels XL™, 100% USDA Biobased Face Towel, Disposable Face Towelette, Eczema Association Accepted, Makeup Remover Dry Wipes, Ultra Soft, 50 Ct, 1 Pack

The Roku Channel

Neutrogena Makeup Remover Wipes, Daily Facial Cleanser Towelettes, Gently Cleanse and Remove Oil & Makeup, Alcohol-Free Makeup Wipes, 2 x 25 ct

CERAKOTE® Ceramic Headlight Restoration Kit – Guaranteed To Last As Long As You Own Your Vehicle – Brings Headlights Back to Like New Condition - No Power Tools Required - 10 Wipe Kit

دليل مرجعي سريع

The Briefing with Smith Freed Eberhard « »
7/21/21 - Washington Supreme Court Says Termination of a Contract, Not for Default, Equals a Termination for Convenience