Artwork

Content provided by Massimo Pigliucci. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Massimo Pigliucci or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

The Philosophy Garden: Stoicism and Beyond

Share
 

Archived series ("Inactive feed" status)

When? This feed was archived on May 17, 2025 12:13 (2M ago). Last successful fetch was on April 15, 2025 10:11 (3M ago)

Why? Inactive feed status. Our servers were unable to retrieve a valid podcast feed for a sustained period.

What now? You might be able to find a more up-to-date version using the search function. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.

Manage series 3588922
Content provided by Massimo Pigliucci. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Massimo Pigliucci or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
By Massimo Pigliucci, a scientist, philosopher, and Professor at the City College of New York. Exploring and practicing Stoicism & other philosophies of life.
  continue reading

6 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 

Archived series ("Inactive feed" status)

When? This feed was archived on May 17, 2025 12:13 (2M ago). Last successful fetch was on April 15, 2025 10:11 (3M ago)

Why? Inactive feed status. Our servers were unable to retrieve a valid podcast feed for a sustained period.

What now? You might be able to find a more up-to-date version using the search function. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.

Manage series 3588922
Content provided by Massimo Pigliucci. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Massimo Pigliucci or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
By Massimo Pigliucci, a scientist, philosopher, and Professor at the City College of New York. Exploring and practicing Stoicism & other philosophies of life.
  continue reading

6 episodes

All episodes

×
 
T
The Philosophy Garden: Stoicism and Beyond
The Philosophy Garden: Stoicism and Beyond podcast artwork
 
“If what is said by the philosophers regarding the kinship of Nature and people be true, what other course remains for us but that which Socrates took when asked to what country he belonged, never to say ‘I am an Athenian,’ or ‘I am a Corinthian,’ but ‘I am a citizen of the universe’? For why do you say that you are an Athenian, instead of mentioning merely that corner into which your paltry body was cast at birth? … As soon as you have had your fill to-day, you sit lamenting about the morrow, by which means you shall be fed. Man, if you get it, you will have it; if you do not get it, you will depart; the door stands open. Why grieve? Where is there yet room for tears? What occasion for flattery? Why shall one person envy another? Why shall we admire those who have great possessions, or those who are stationed in places of power, especially if they be prone to anger? For what will they do to us? … How did Socrates feel with regard to these matters? … ‘If you tell me now,’ says he, ‘We will acquit you on these conditions, namely, that you will no longer engage in these discussions which you have conducted hitherto, nor trouble either the young or the old among us,’ I will answer, ‘You make yourselves ridiculous.’ … We, however, think of ourselves as though we were mere bellies, entrails, and genitals, just because we have fear, because we have appetite, and we flatter those who have power to help us in these matters, and these same people we fear.” (Discourses, 1.9) The Philosophy Garden: Stoicism and Beyond is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.…
 
T
The Philosophy Garden: Stoicism and Beyond
The Philosophy Garden: Stoicism and Beyond podcast artwork
 
Socrates, Museo Schifanoia, Ferrara, Italy. Photo by the Author. “Socrates excels the founder of Christianity in being able to be serious cheerfully and in possessing that wisdom full of roguishness that constitutes the finest state of the human soul.” (F. Nietzsche, Human All Too Human) There is a fundamental difference between debate and dialogue. You debate an opponent, you dialogue with a fellow inquirer. Debates are inherently antagonistic, while dialogues are collaborative endeavors. I used to do a lot more debates early on in my life, now I strive as much as possible to engage in dialogue. Don’t get me wrong, there are appropriate times and places for a debate. For instance, I’m often invited as a panelist to the wonderful How the Light Gets In festival , held annually in both Hay-on-Wye (Wales) and London. Sometimes one of the panelists is a proponent of pseudoscience, like Rupert Sheldrake . On such occasions, my goal is not to convince my (properly so-called) opponent, who is likely beyond redemption. Rather, the objective is to reach those people in the audience who have not yet set their mind and may be open to a different perspective. But as I was saying, apart from such increasingly rare public performances, I prefer constructive dialogue. With my friends, my students, and the readers of this newsletter. It may come as no surprise, then, that I’m very interested in anything that has to do with the Socratic method, such as the wonderful book on the subject by Ward Farnsworth. In chapter 10, Farnsworth (who has also written a highly recommended volume about Stoicism ), discusses a series of rules on how to conduct an effective Socratic dialogue, taken directly from the various Platonic writings. Here are the rules, in a short and handy format: #1: Seek the truth. The first rule concerns what I have just mentioned: the difference between dialogue and debate. Socrates uses the words dialectic and eristic respectively, and “eristic” was usually not meant as a compliment in antiquity. The word comes from the Greek eris , which means strife, discord, and therefore obviously something that is not conducive to a joint and friendly quest for truth. Socrates himself explains: “Youngsters, as you may have observed, when they first get the taste in their mouths, argue for amusement, and are always contradicting and refuting others in imitation of those who refute them. …But when a man begins to get older, he will no longer be guilty of such insanity; he will imitate the dialectician who is seeking for truth, and not the eristic, who is contradicting for the sake of amusement; and the greater moderation of his character will increase instead of diminishing the honor of the pursuit.” (Republic, 539bd) #2: Concern yourself with the person, not just what they are saying. Farnsworth perceptively notes that most of the Platonic dialogues don’t have the sort of title you might expect. While the Stoic Seneca, for instance, wrote books with titles like “On Anger,” or “On the Shortness of Life,” Plato wrote Charmides , Crito , Euthyphro , Gorgias , Phaedrus , and so forth. That is, he used names of people, not labels for topics. That’s because Socrates’s main concern was with the kind of search for truth that would bring about the betterment of humanity, beginning with himself and his interlocutors. His inquiry into propositions is always in the service of examining individuals and how they conduct their lives by following (or not) the principles they claim to abide by. This is very different from much modern philosophy, which focuses on a-personal, abstract topics, without regard (allegedly) to whom makes which arguments. By contrast, ancient philosophy, and especially the Socratic variety, was meant to be a kind of therapy for the soul. What we think about topics like courage, justice, piety, and so forth is a reflection of our general worldview. In turn, our worldview guides our actions, so what we think matters because it both reflects and shapes who we are and what we do. “I go about doing nothing else but urging you, young and old alike, not to care for your bodies or for your money sooner than, or as much as, for your psyche, and how to make it as good as you can.” (Apology, 30a) #3: Give priority to reason. While Socrates may seem at times to be arguing with his interlocutors, a better way to describe what’s going on is that he puts them in a position to argue with themselves. Socrates assumes a starting point that is agreeable to the person he’s talking to and then explores the consequences of that starting point. He does so with an eye toward possible inconsistencies so that something can be learned from whatever issue he uncovers in the process. Read more…
 
T
The Philosophy Garden: Stoicism and Beyond
The Philosophy Garden: Stoicism and Beyond podcast artwork
 
“Was not Plato a philosopher? Yes, and was not Hippocrates a physician? But you see how eloquently Hippocrates expresses himself. Does Hippocrates, then, express himself so eloquently by virtue of his being a physician? Why, then, do you confuse things that for no particular reason have been combined in the same man? Now if Plato was handsome and strong, ought I to sit down and strive to become handsome, or become strong, on the assumption that this is necessary for philosophy, because a certain philosopher was at the same time both handsome and a philosopher? Are you not willing to observe and distinguish just what that is by virtue of which men become philosophers, and what qualities pertain to them for no particular reason? Come now, if I were a philosopher, ought you to become lame like me? What then? Am I depriving you of these faculties? Far be it from me! No more than I am depriving you of the faculty of sight. Yet, if you enquire of me what is humanity’s good, I can give you no other answer than that it is a kind of moral purpose.” (Discourses, 1.8) The Philosophy Garden: Stoicism and Beyond is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.…
 
T
The Philosophy Garden: Stoicism and Beyond
The Philosophy Garden: Stoicism and Beyond podcast artwork
 
“Most people are unaware that the handling of arguments which involve equivocal and hypothetical premisses, and, further, of those which derive syllogisms by the process of interrogation, and, in general, the handling of all such arguments, has a bearing upon the duties of life. For our aim in every matter of inquiry is to learn how the good and excellent person may find the appropriate course through it and the appropriate way of conducting themselves in it. … For what is the professed object of reasoning? To state the true, to eliminate the false, to suspend judgement in doubtful cases. … [Therefore] one must learn in what way a thing follows as a consequence upon certain other things. … There has consequently arisen among us, and shown itself to be necessary, a science which deals with inferential arguments and with logical figures and trains people therein. … Why are we still indolent and easy-going and sluggish, seeking excuses whereby we may avoid toiling or even late hours, as we try to perfect our own reason? — If, then, I err in these matters, I have not murdered my own father, have I? — Slave, pray where was there in this case a father for you to murder? What, then, have you done, you ask? You have committed what was the only possible error in the matter. Indeed this is the very remark I made to Rufus when he censured me for not discovering the one omission in a certain syllogism. ‘Well,’ said I, ‘it isn’t as bad as if I had burned down the Capitol.’ But he answered, ‘Slave, the omission here is the Capitol.’” (Discourses, 1.7) The Philosophy Garden: Stoicism and Beyond is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.…
 
T
The Philosophy Garden: Stoicism and Beyond
The Philosophy Garden: Stoicism and Beyond podcast artwork
 
The Boxer, National Roman Museum, Rome. Photo by the Author. If you made it this far in this 54-week marathon, Congratulations on completing our curriculum! You’ve put in a lot of hard work. While I hope you’ve learned a great deal from using this series and the accompanying book, the Handbook for New Stoics (co-written with my friend Greg Lopez), chances are you are not yet a Stoic sage. If that’s the case, then the next question is: What should you do now? This final installment (and corresponding book chapter) will help you answer this question. When you’re ready, let’s get started. Design Your Own Stoic Curriculum At this point, you have a choice to make. During your exploration of Stoicism, you may have experienced the benefits of Stoic practice and would now like to continue with it. Or, you may have found that Stoic practice isn’t for you. If that’s the case, that’s fine! While I believe that having some kind of philosophy of life is useful to most people, I also know that Stoicism isn’t necessarily a good fit for everyone. Before proceeding, take some time to think about whether you’d like to continue your Stoic practice, and answer honestly. If you’d like to continue your journey as a proficiens (one of those who makes progress), read on. I realize that not every exercise is a good fit for everyone, and that people will wind up in different places while working through this series and book. Because Stoic practice is not one-size-fits-all, the rest of this entry is dedicated to helping you design your own personalized Stoic curriculum. Step 1: Review which exercises worked for you I have listed all the exercises from this book in the following tables. Take some time to go back and find which exercises were helpful for you, and note them down. I have sorted the exercises into themes, which will be useful in the next few steps of designing your own curriculum. (I’ll come back to themes in Step 3.) After all the exercises that you wished to come back to are noted in the table, it may help to cross out the ones you didn’t find helpful. [Key: S = Set time; O = Occasionally, when the opportunity arises; C = Constantly, as often as possible.] Discipline of Desire and Aversion: Discipline of Action: Discipline of Assent: Step 2: Determine which discipline to start from Our main goal in this Series and book was to provide an adequate sampling of Stoic practices. Now the question remains: Which discipline should you start from? While no hard-and-fast rules exist, Epictetus clearly states that the Discipline of Desire is meant to progress in this discipline is a necessary precondition for the other two disciplines. If you are not well practiced in the Discipline of Desire, then your mind will be ruled more by passions than by reason, making intentional, prosocial action and clear, logical thinking much more difficult—if not impossible. That said, if you strongly believe that you’d benefit from starting with the Discipline of Action or of Assent, feel free to do so. Keep in mind that you can always take the Discipline of Desire for a quick spin. If you choose to start elsewhere, be absolutely sure that you have strong reasons for doing so, and that you’re not simply averse to our suggestion of starting at the beginning, or givin to your desire to be thought of as an advanced Stoic—those are clear signs that you need more work in the first discipline! The Philosophy Garden: Stoicism and Beyond is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Step 3: Design your initial practice Now that you’ve chosen a discipline to work with further, you can choose the exercises you’d like to practice within that discipline. In the tables you filled out in Step 1, you’ll have noticed that each exercise is labeled with letters. S: The exercise is meant to be done intentionally at a set time. For example, imaginative premeditation, described in Week 6, requires you to set time aside to practice. This can be daily, but it doesn’t have to be. O: These exercises are done when the occasion arises for which they are relevant. Keep these exercises in mind, and when the opportunity to practice them comes about, you can do so. Using Week 6 again as an example, premeditating on others’ adversity requires encountering (or reading or hearing about) a person who is struggling with something. You would use this cue as a reminder to tell yourself that something similar could happen to you. Since some of the exercises in Week 6 are practiced at a set time, while others are done occasionally, the chapter is labeled with both an S and an O. C: These exercises (or aspects of them) are practiced constantly, or as often as possible. For example, the final exercise, in Week 52, requires applying the dichotomy of control to as many externals you encounter throughout the day as you can. You may not be doing these exercises every single waking moment, but you will be applying them much more throughout your day, compared with the other two types. These exercises tend to have broad application. You also don’t set time aside to do them; you integrate them into your life. They don’t take more time out of your day, but they do require quite a bit of mental effort. When exercises are labeled with multiple tags, either multiple forms of the exercise were presented in the chapter and they can be used in different cases, or components of the exercise have different timing. For example, Week 36 is (O, C) because you must watch for impressions constantly (C), but only counter harsh ones, which arise occasionally (O). With that out of the way, it’s time to design a practice within your chosen discipline. Turn back to the tables in Step 1 and look at which practices worked for you, then choose which you’d like to work with for now. Here are some recommendations. Keep it simple. Only choose one or two practices to work with at a time. Many people get overwhelmed when confronted with too much choice, so narrowing your practice may be useful. For most people, I recommend having one practice that is done at a set time and one done occasionally. Practices at a set time give consistency, and practices done occasionally help you practice in daily life. If you struggle with one area in particular within a given discipline, choose an exercise relevant to that particular issue to start out with. Begin with a less challenging aspect of your chosen area and increase difficulty with time. Stay within your chosen discipline until you are ready to move on. To give you an example of how to think about choosing your initial practice, let’s turn to Alice, whom we first met in Week 1 (see the book version of the exercise). Alice had anxiety around her job performance. Working with anxiety lies squarely within the Discipline of Desire. From there, Alice can keep things simple by choosing just a couple of exercises to work with that apply directly to that issue. She might choose acting the opposite to her anxiety when it arises at work (Week 10) for her occasional exercise and imaginative premeditation (Week 6) for her set time exercise. She can limit acting the opposite only to work anxiety, to keep things simple. She can always broaden the exercise to other situations and passions later. When she does imaginative premeditation, she may start by imagining herself fifteen minutes before a performance review. When imagining that it doesn’t yield much anxiety, she can move on to visualizing the actual performance review. Over time, she’ll move on to imagining worst-case scenarios, such as being chewed out by her boss, or being fired. But she wouldn’t start out with those; she’d work her way toward them only after imagining easier scenarios that don’t yield much anxiety. One final note before you sketch out your initial practice: Take my advice lightly! If you’ve worked your way through this entire series / book, you likely have a pretty good idea of what will work for you and what won’t. Feel free to design a practice that you think will best suit you. Write down which practices you’d like to start out with, choosing ones from the tables in Step 1. You may also wish to write out the specifics of how you’ll practice them. Step 4: Know when and how to progress You won’t be using your initial practice forever. So, how will you know when it’s time to move on? Here are two ways: Proceeding to the next discipline: Epictetus laid out some general ways to know how you are progressing in Discourses, 4. I suggest you give this a read every now and again. Unfortunately, there aren’t many specifics in there about figuring out exactly when to move between disciplines. While Epictetus’s words may be enough for some, I’ll offer additional suggestions for those who would like further guidance. The most important idea to keep in mind is that individual Stoic exercises have only one goal: to help you improve your character through fulfilling the goals of each discipline. Recall the goals of the first two disciplines: Discipline of Desire: to reduce desires and transfer aversions from externals to internals (i.e., to be less averse to external circumstances and instead concern yourself with how you handle them). Discipline of Action: to act intentionally (not at random, or impelled by circumstance) and prosocially (keeping others’ well-being in mind). You can use these as signposts of whether to proceed to the next discipline, perhaps by journaling about your progress every few months and comparing where you are to the goals of the discipline you are practicing. If you’re working with the Discipline of Desire, and don’t have many strong aversions or desires for externals, you can move on to the Discipline of Action. And if you’re working with that discipline and find that you often act intentionally and with others in mind, then you can move on to the Discipline of Assent. You don’t have to be perfect in the first two disciplines to move on (indeed, perfecting the practice is the goal of the Discipline of Assent), but you shouldn’t have many big issues in those areas before proceeding. If you prefer quantitative guidance over the qualitative criteria given above, you can revisit the quizzes Greg and I provided for each section (in the book) to occasionally rate yourself in each discipline—and perhaps have another person you trust rate you, too, just to be sure. Then, if you reach a certain self-rating in all three questions for the part quiz, you can move on to the next discipline. If you like this approach, I have reproduced the section quiz questions below. For the Discipline you’ve chosen to work on, write down what rating you’d like to reach before moving on to the next discipline (there are no questions for the Discipline of Assent, since that’s the end of the line!). While you can choose any rating, I suggest striving for 3 or above, since, again, you don’t need to be perfect before proceeding! Once you meet your goals in one discipline, you can then use the tools and suggestions in Step 3 to help guide you in creating a new initial curriculum for the next discipline. If and when you reach the Discipline of Assent, you can take a look at whether you are weaker in the Discipline of Desire or Discipline of Action, and choose exercises from the appropriate column within the Discipline of Assent that you feel best address what you’d like to work on. Moving on to other exercises within a discipline. Here are some cues to let you know that it may be time to change exercises within a discipline: If a given practice does not seem to be working; If circumstances change and another exercise seems more relevant; If your overall progress within the discipline seems stagnant, but you haven’t met your goals for the discipline; If you’d like to explore new exercises that worked for you in the past; If the practice has become second nature to you and you’re ready to add a new one within the same discipline; If you’ve made significant progress in the area addressed by the exercise, and want to try a new exercise for a different area of your life. I suggest not rotating exercises too frequently in order to give them sufficient time to have an effect. I also recommend switching to practices that can be done constantly (marked with a C in the tables) when you are closer to your goals within a discipline, as these tend to be harder but also more beneficial. Your own personalized Stoic curriculum can last months, years, or even a lifetime. In the book , Greg and I also provide readers with some additional resources to help supplement your study of Stoic philosophy, suggesting the best available translations of the ancient texts, new commentaries on classic Stoic authors and themes, books on contemporary Stoicism, and both online and offline resources. The journey continues, happy practice!…
 
T
The Philosophy Garden: Stoicism and Beyond
The Philosophy Garden: Stoicism and Beyond podcast artwork
 
Statue of Marcus Aurelius in Altenberg, Austria. Photo by the Author. [This series of posts is based on A Handbook for New Stoics —How to Thrive in a World out of Your Control, co-authored by yours truly and Greg Lopez. It is a collection of 52 exercises, which we propose reader try out one per week during a whole year, to actually live like a Stoic. In Europe/UK the book is published by Rider under the title Live Like A Stoic .Below is this week’s prompt and a brief explanation of the pertinent philosophical background. Check the book for details on how to practice the exercise, download the exercise forms from The Experiment’s website , and comment below on how things are going. Greg and/or I will try our best to help out! This week’s exercise is found at pp. 285-287 of the paperback edition.] “Do not let the impression of life as a whole confound you. Do not focus in one all the train of possible and painful consequences; but as each trouble comes, say to yourself: What is there here too hard to bear or to endure? And you will be ashamed to avow it so. And yet again remember, that you have not to bear up against the future or the past, but always against the present only. And even that you minimize, when you strictly circumscribe it to itself, and repudiate moral inability to hold out merely against that.” (Marcus Aurelius, Meditations, 8.36) The Stoics often rephrase or decompose impressions in order to arrive at better judgments. We have recently encountered a number of these exercises. In Week 44, Marcus broke down the sources of his desires to remind himself that they were not, in fact, so desirable. In Week 49, Epictetus suggested using neutral language whenever we are tempted to judge others. This week we learn another way: Rephrase or break down elements into component parts—this time in order to deal with our aversions. Read more…
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play