Smart Investing With Brent & Chase Wilsey podcast

Player FM - Internet Radio Done Right

تمت الإضافة منذ قبل four أعوام

المحتوى المقدم من Brent & Chase Wilsey and Chase Wilsey. يتم تحميل جميع محتويات البودكاست بما في ذلك الحلقات والرسومات وأوصاف البودكاست وتقديمها مباشرة بواسطة Brent & Chase Wilsey and Chase Wilsey أو شريك منصة البودكاست الخاص بهم. إذا كنت تعتقد أن شخصًا ما يستخدم عملك المحمي بحقوق الطبع والنشر دون إذنك، فيمكنك اتباع العملية الموضحة هنا https://ar.player.fm/legal.

Uncuffed

1
S4, E1 - Day One 7:38

منذ 5 weeks7:38

التشغيل لاحقا

قوائم

إعجاب

احب

7:38

Last summer, something monumental happened. One of Uncuffed's founding producers, Greg Eskridge, came home after more than 30 years in prison. In this episode we’ll bring you back to that emotional day last summer when he walked out of the San Quentin gates, free at last. Our work in prisons is supported by the California Arts Council, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, independent foundations, and donations from listeners like you. Learn more, sign up for Uncuffed news, and support the program at www.weareuncuffed.org Follow us @WeAreUncuffed on Instagram and Facebook Transcripts are available within a week of the episode coming out at www.kalw.org/podcast/uncuffed…

Smart Investing with Brent & Chase Wilsey

منزل السلاسل•Feed

Smart Investing is the radio show where Brent and Chase try to make investing easier to understand. They demonstrate long-term investment strategies to help you find good value investments.

288 حلقات

#Smart Investing #Chase Wilsey #Trading #Business #Brent Chase Wilsey

Smart Investing with Brent & Chase Wilsey

updated منذ 14 ساعة

منزل السلاسل•Feed

Smart Investing is the radio show where Brent and Chase try to make investing easier to understand. They demonstrate long-term investment strategies to help you find good value investments.

288 حلقات

#Smart Investing #Chase Wilsey #Trading #Business #Brent Chase Wilsey

كل الحلقات

1
March 8th, 2025 | Church Pension Plans, Structured Products, Job Report, Avoid State Taxes from Federal Debt, Sempra (SRE), The Mosaic Company (MOS), Zoom Communications (ZM), & Discover (DFS) 55:40

منذ 14 hours55:40

55:40

Church pension plans may be at risk I hate to say this because we all want to believe that one of the safest places to go is church. Unfortunately, there are church pension plans like Saint Claire’s Hospital in Schenectady, New York and Saint Joseph Hospital in Rhode Island that had no or very little money left for retirees when it was time for their retirement. You may be wondering how can that be? Pension plans should be safe especially under federal law where there are protections from the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, which is commonly known as ERISA. You may also think if you know something about pension plans that employers must pay into the pension benefit guarantee corporation or what is also known as the PBGC. Unfortunately, when the government came up with the federal law on pension plans to protect retirees, there was concern about the constitutional separation of church and state and they did not want to cross that line. So they exempted churches and employers related to the church, which would include schools, hospitals and publishers. Church pension plans are allowed to contribute to the pension benefit guarantee corporation, but they’re not required to and unfortunately most do not. It is sad that we cannot trust some of our religious leaders to protect our financial future. If you or someone you know works for a type of association related to a church and they have a pension plan they may want to dig deep into it to make sure it’s really there. Unfortunately, there have been church pension plans that have exaggerated the returns on their investments in their pension plan and ultimately collapsed when people began retiring. It may be unfortunate but it could be wise to have a secondary retirement plan if you work for a church just to be on the safe side so you have something there in your golden years! Structured products are back from 2008 Structured products that destroyed the economy in 2008 are back once again. In 2008 there was nearly $1.8 trillion of structured products issued. For 2025, the experts are forecasting structured product issuance of $2 trillion. If you don’t understand what a structure product is, it is nothing fancy other than Wall Street creating loans that hide their true value. In 2008 these were mainly mortgage-backed loans that Wall Street sold and told people there’s no way that these borrowers would default on their real estate loans. Today, they are even riskier with the loans backed by weak assets such as credit card debt, lease payments on cars, airplanes, golf carts and even plastic surgery loans. Recently in Las Vegas there was a convention for four days that was packed with bankers from Wall Street and around the country that were all in the buzz about the hype of the profits they can make off of these structured products. So far investors have been safe and have not had any losses, but that will change in the years to come especially if the economy weakens. With higher demand, prices for these products are now higher and I believe overpriced. The higher demand also creates riskier investments that look similar to products with less risk but make no mistake, they have far greater risk. It appears to me that the greed on Wall Street is back and the bankers are trying to tell you that stock investing is out. They tell you that you should be putting your money into these structured products for diversification to avoid market fluctuations, but the real reason for this is the fees they make are so much higher than if you just invested in good quality equities that pay dividends and grow over the long-term. Wall Street makes nothing off of that! Jobs report seems uneventful, which is a good thing February nonfarm payrolls increased by 151k in the month, which was less than the estimate of 170k. While I wouldn’t say that’s a positive, it was better than last month’s reading of 125k and it still shows the labor market remained healthy. Revisions to the previous two months were extremely minor as December was revised up by 16k and January was revised down by 18k for a net impact of -2k. Many areas remained strong with health care and social assistance adding slightly over 63k jobs, construction saw growth of 19k jobs, transportation and warehousing was up close to 18k jobs, and manufacturing increased by 10k jobs. Some areas were a little disappointing with professional and business services declining by 2k jobs, retail trade fell by a little over 6k jobs, and leisure and hospitality was the biggest drag with a decline of 16k jobs. The big question many people had was if the cuts from the Department of Government Efficiency, also known as DOGE, would be felt in this report. It appears there was a minor impact as government jobs actually increased by 11k in the month, but that was in spite of a decline of 10k federal jobs. My estimation is that we will see the declines for government jobs increase in future months as the survey data came largely after many of these announced job cuts. In a separate report from outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas there were 62,242 federal job cuts in the month of February. The report also showed U.S. employers announced 172,017 layoffs in the month of February, which was the highest monthly amount since July 2020. Announced layoffs through the first two months of the year totaled 221,812, which was the highest for the period since 2009 and up 33% compared to the same period last year. While this may sound concerning, the big question that we will have to follow is can the private sector replace these cuts with new hiring? Based on the continued strength we have seen in job openings; I believe the labor market will remain in a good place. With that said, the data should definitely be much more eventful in the months to come. Avoid State Taxes from Federal Debt Interest rates have been higher than normal for the last several years, and many investors have been taking advantage of this by placing cash in areas that pay higher rates of interest. A great way to do this is by buying U.S. Treasury Obligations such as Treasury bills, notes, and bonds. These are guaranteed, often pay a higher interest rate than high-yield savings accounts or CDs, and the interest is exempt from income tax at the state level. By purchasing a money market mutual fund that holds exclusively U.S. Treasury Obligations, you keep all those benefits while also maintaining liquidity. While this should not be viewed as a long-term investment, it is a great place for short-term cash. However, in order to receive the tax benefit, the interest income must be property reported. Every year investors receive 1099-INT’s for interest income and 1099-DIV’s for dividend income which includes interest from U.S. Treasury Obligations. However, the tax-exempt status of the interest is not always obvious on the 1099 form, especially when the interest came from a fund. Every year, custodians like Schwab, Fidelity, and Vanguard produce a supplementary tax information form that breaks down how much of their funds’ income was from non-taxable government debt. This form along with the 1099 can be used to calculate exactly how much tax-exempt interest you had so that you can correctly report your investment income. Whether you do your taxes yourself, or work with a tax preparer, make sure you are aware of any federal debt interest so that you don’t overpay on your state income taxes. Companies Discussed: Sempra (SRE), The Mosaic Company (MOS), Zoom Communications Inc. (ZM), & Discover Financial Services (DFS)…

1
March 1st, 2025 | Home Sales, Home Sellers, Overpriced AI, Berkshire Hathaway, Full Retirement Age, Freeport-McMoRan Inc.(FCX), Qualcomm Incorporated(QCOM), Super Micro Computer (SMCI) & (LLY) 55:41

منذ 8 أيام55:41

55:41

Home sales are starting to look weak Last week we saw the release of existing home sales in the month of January and the decline was far bigger than expected. The number of units sold on an annual basis was 4.08 million, which was a decline 4.9% compared to the prior month. Analysts were expecting a smaller decline of 2.6%. While inventory remains tight at a 3.5-month supply, it is improving. Month over month inventory increased 3.5% and when compared to last January, we saw an increase of 17%. For now, it appears that housing prices are stable with the median price of a home sold in January at $396,900, an increase of 4.8% over last January. The number of cash buyers slipped from 32% one year ago to now only 29%. What is more disturbing is the numbers on first time homebuyers. Over history, first time homebuyers have generally made up around 40% of home sales, but January data shows that has slipped to only 28%. I don’t see a crash in the housing market coming, but I do believe people buying a house thinking they will make 10 to 20% on their investment over the next year or so is a mistake as I’m pretty confident those days are gone. If you’re going to buy a home, buy it as a place to live and raise your family, do not try to make a quick investment return on the short term. Some home sellers are giving up As a whole, the US home selling market has had some cracks, which we have talked about in the past. The rising interest rates have kept buyers on the sidelines and people selling their homes still think they’re worth more than what they can get in today’s market. Also, sellers have been spoiled over the past few years thinking you put your house on the market and you should be able to sell it in less than a month. Over a longer period of time, which looks out further than just the last few years, it used to maybe take 3 to 6 months to sell a home. Home sellers really became discouraged in December as delistings soared 64% in the month compared to last year after not finding an interested buyer to purchase the home. At 73,000 delistings, this was the highest level since 2015. We could see that change if interest rates come back down, but at this point in time there’s no indications that that will happen in a major way. I’m still looking for a low growth environment for the price of real estate in the coming years. Another comparison showing AI is overpriced Many people have used the comparison of the tech boom and bust when looking at the high prices for a lot of these AI stocks, which I believe has a lot of relevance. But if you go back 100 years, there’s another comparison with Radio Corp. of America, which was a booming technology back then. If your company put radio in the name somewhere, you got to ride along on the upward trend. Sound familiar? RCA stock rose 200 times its value during the 1920s, but then by 1932 it fell 98%. What is even more amazing is in 1986 General Electric acquired RCA for about 72% higher than the price peak back in 1929. It has never been a wise investment strategy to overpay for any investment, which seems to mostly happens in technology. Over the years this hype cycle has happened with cannabis, electric vehicles, and 3-D printers just to name a few. No one knows where the top will be for AI, but one thing I know for certain is many people will lose far more than they could even imagine, which unfortunately will destroy their retirement portfolios. Berkshire Hathaway historically high cash balance It is no secret that Warren Buffett’s company, Berkshire Hathaway, is sitting on over $300 billion in cash, which is invested mostly in T-bills. As a percent of assets, it is now just over 25%, which has never been seen before. The excess cash is caused by two things, first reducing ownership of Apple and some other stocks. Last year alone Berkshire sold 605 million shares or about 70% of its holdings in the stock. It now has a market value of only $75 billion. The second reason for all the cash is likely because of his philosophy to invest when others are fearful and sell when they are greedy. We are definitely in the greedy stage, which we have been talking about at our firm for probably over a year now. No one knows when this will change, but it will. With the expensive nature of many companies and the markets, Warren Buffett likely cannot find anything on sale that he believes is worth buying. I don’t see a major crash coming in the near future, but I also don’t see any big gains coming either. I do continue to believe we will likely see a correction that leads to a short-term pullback of 10 to 20%. I hope you’re prepared for a few months of volatility, as I believe it is coming. What’s so Special about your “Full Retirement Age”? The Social Security Administration references your “full retirement age” quite often, so it is important to understand why that matters, and why it doesn’t. The main reasons this age is important is because at that point you are no longer subject to the earnings limit, and your benefit amount at that age is used to calculate spousal benefits. If you begin collecting Social Security before your full retirement age, you are subject to an earnings limit of $23,400. For every $2 of wage or self-employment income you have above that limit, $1 of your Social Security benefit will be withheld from you. Other income sources do not count and this rule no longer applies after reaching you full retirement age, meaning you can work and earn as much as you want. If you do have Social Security withheld due to the earnings limit, you will receive a credit for that when you reach your full retirement age. As a spouse if you had a limited earnings history, you may collect a spousal benefit from the record of your higher earning spouse. The spousal benefit is ½ of the higher earning spouse’s full retirement age benefit amount. The age that the higher earning spouse actually collects does not change the spousal benefit. In order to receive the full spousal benefit, the lower earning spouse needs to collect at their own full retirement age. Waiting beyond that does not increase the spousal benefit, but collecting before full retirement age will reduce the spousal benefit. For those reasons full retirement age matters, but there are plenty of situations where it doesn’t. If you stop working before your full retirement age, then the earnings limit is irrelevant, and if you and your spouse both have an earnings history, then spousal benefits are irrelevant. Many retirees have the belief that something special happens to their benefit amount at their full retirement age, but the truth is, your Social Security window is from age 62 to 70. Every month you wait to start, your benefit amount increases slightly. There is no additional increase upon reaching a specific calendar year, birthday, or even your full retirement age. For some it may be best to collect at their full retirement age, but for the majority of retirees it is more beneficial to collect at an age other than their full retirement age based on their individual income, asset, and tax situation. Companies Discussed: Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX), Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM), Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI) & Eli Lilly and Company (LLY)…

1
February 22nd, 2025 | Senior Housing Market Boom, Young Investors, Weak Consumer Sentiments, Tax Traps with Rentals, Intel Corporation(INTC), Illumina Inc.(ILMN), The Kraft Heinz Company(KHC) & (HIMS) 55:37

منذ 15 يومًا55:37

55:37

Will the senior housing market boom continue going forward? Investors may think with the population getting older that investing in senior housing could be a great investment going forward. They could be right as the oldest boomers turn 80 at the end of this year. What’s even more amazing is that the US population of 80-year-olds and older will hit 18.8 million in the next five years, that is a 27% increase from today. Senior housing hit a brick wall when the pandemic hit in 2020 and with the high infection rates, loss of life, and social distancing restrictions the demand fell drastically for senior housing. Both the high cost of labor and the shortage of it did not help either. It is estimated in five years they will need 560,000 new units to meet the expected demand. However, due to the high cost of development and the concern that about half of the seniors won’t be able to afford private senior housing costs, it’s estimated that only about 191,000 units will be added. The good news is more than 40% of seniors could afford senior housing on their income alone, which increased from 30% eight years ago. Unfortunately, those who can afford senior housing would rather not use it and prefer to age at home. Developers are willing to risk their capital on the higher end of the wealthiest seniors building luxury senior housing with fine dining, spas and movie theaters. One high end luxury senior housing project is expected to break ground this year at Rancho Santa Fe in San Diego with 172 units available. I think this sector for investing at this point is worth watching, but I don’t think I’d want to commit any capital at this time given there seem to be some substantial risks. Are young investors taking too much risk? A comparison of Gen Z, who were born between 1997 through 2012, versus baby boomers, who born from 1946 to 1964, show that Gen Z is taking on much more risk compared to when baby boomers were their age. In a study from the FINRA Investor Education Foundation, 36% of respondents between the ages of 18 to 34 had traded options. This compares to 8% of investors who were 55 years and older. Also revealed in the survey was younger and new investors were more likely to use margin when investing. This came at a surprisingly high rate with 23% of investors between the ages of 18 and 34 saying they had used margin when investing. This compares to just 3% of respondents age 55 and older. What was also interesting and informative is the lack of investing experience as 19% of investors with less than two years of investing experience stated they had used margin. However, just 6% of investors with experience of 10 years or more have used margin. I think many of these older investors are more cautious because they had learned their lesson. There’s no doubt that the younger investor today is taking on more risk than the more experienced investors. I believe this is for two reasons. First off, the access to trade and invest is so easy and it can be done on the phone in your hand at essentially any point in time. Compare that to 25-35 years ago when investors had to go through a broker to trade. The second reason I see is the Great Recession in 2008 was 17 years ago and the young investors today were only 5 to 15 years old and had no interest or care about the economy and the crash of the stock market. Investing successfully long-term involves many years of experience and research and unfortunately, I believe the younger investors will learn by experience that the risk they are taking today will not end well. Weak consumer sentiment brings down stocks Stocks fell on Friday after the headline consumer sentiment index came in at 64.7, which was down 9.8% from January and below the estimate for 67.8. This reading was also down 15.9% compared to this time last year. I was surprised to see the one-year expectation for inflation came in at 4.3%, which was the highest level since November 2023. The five-year outlook increased substantially to 3.5%, which would be the highest reading since April 1995. It was not a major surprise to see sentiment fall for Democrats and stay unchanged for Republicans, but it did fall for Independents. While I think it is important to look at various economic data, I wouldn’t say this survey is overly troubling. This survey comes from the University of Michigan and when I was researching how many people it encompasses, I found it includes at least 600 households and is conducted by phone each month. It is designed to be representative of all US households, excluding Alaska and Hawaii, but with such a small data set compared to total US households as of 2023 at 131.43 million, I must say I question how indicative of all US households it truly is. As I said, I don’t want to completely disregard this data point, but given the limited insight I would not be overly concerned. I do believe this shows how fickle the market is at this point and even an inkling of bad news could send stocks lower given the high valuations. Beware the tax trap of renting out your house If you’re moving out of your current house, you may be considering converting your home into a rental property. This may seem like an attractive way to generate additional income. However, before making this move, it’s important to be aware of the tax implications, especially the potential loss of the Section 121 capital gain exclusion. When you sell a primary residence, you may exclude up to $250,000, or $500,000 for married couples, of capital gains if you owned and used the home as your primary residence for at least two out of the previous five years. When renting out your home, you still own it, but it is no longer considered your primary residence. If you decide to sell the property more than three years after beginning to rent it, it no longer qualifies for any capital gain exclusion, resulting in a potentially large tax bill, exceeding $185,000 in some cases. Not only that, but while renting a property you claim depreciation each year. This reduces your taxable income while owning a rental, but that accumulated depreciation must be “recaptured”, which means taxed, at ordinary income rates when the property is sold. This recaptured depreciation tax also cannot be offset by the Section 121 exclusion regardless of the timing of the sale. If you want to rent out your home, make sure you either sell it before losing the exclusion, or be committed to being a real estate investor for the long haul. Companies Discussed: Intel Corporation(INTC), Illumina Inc.(ILMN), The Kraft Heinz Company(KHC) & Him & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS)…

1
February 15th, 2025 | AI Electricity Usage, Mag Seven, Producer Prices, Credit Card Interest, Dollar Tree, Inc. (DLTR), Grand Canyon Education, Inc. (LOPE), Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) & (PSX) 55:40

منذ 22 يومًا55:40

55:40

How much electricity will AI need? To train AI models companies use graphics processing units, also known as GPUs. They are now starting to build larger clusters of GPUs, which requires even more electricity. How much electricity you may ask? AI data centers use about 30 Megawatts of electricity at a time. If you don’t understand megawatts, let’s just say it’s a lot of power. Picture 30 Walmart stores and how much electricity they use at any given time, that is estimated at 30 megawatts. Fast forward five years into the future when there will be more data centers and larger AI models. It is estimated they will require 5 gigawatts of electricity. 5 gigawatts is a huge amount of energy, it is about the same amount of energy needed to power a city like Manhattan in New York. Also, a big concern is within the next five years these massive data centers could consume up to 17% of US electricity. You may be thinking just build more power plants. The problem is data centers can be completed within 18 to 24 months, but to build a power plant can take over three years and that’s provided all permits and regulations are met on time. There’s also the concern of how do you get that energy to the data centers, you’re going to need more transmission lines, but that can take 10 years or longer to get that task completed. Wind and solar are not the answer because data centers need power 24 hours seven days a week and when the sun goes down or the wind stops, there’s no power. I see some roadblocks ahead with fast moving AI, maybe we need to slow down a little bit? Mag Seven capital expenditures could be a big problem! The Mag Seven, which includes Apple, Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft, Meta, Nvidia, and Tesla has been a group that has dominated the stock market the last couple of years. Much of the excitement around the stocks have been tied to advancements in AI, but there has still been little evidence these companies (outside of Nvidia) have been able to profit from the trend. A major concern I have is these companies are investing tons of money and the big question is how profitable will these investments be? It is estimated Alphabet, Microsoft, and Meta will spend $200 billion on artificial intelligence this year alone and their budgets have continued to grow. If we look at total capital expenditures, also known as capex, the budgets have grown immensely for many of these companies. Amazon is projected to spend around $105 billion on capital expenditures in 2025, up 27% from 2024, which came after a 57% increase over 2023. Microsoft has guided to $80 billion in capex for its fiscal 2025, up 80% from 2024, which was up 58% from the year before. Alphabet estimated capex of $75 billion in 2025, up 43% from 2023, which was up 63% from 2022. Meta has a forecast of $60 billion to $65 billion of capex in 2025, up 68% at the midpoint from 2024, which was up by 37% from the year before. The big problem with major capex is investors won’t see much of a difference in earnings, but there will be major hits to free cashflow. Capex is generally expensed or depreciated over time, which means it won’t hit earnings in a major way initially, but it could weigh on earnings growth over time as that expense remains for years to come and potentially grows if capex budgets continue to climb. As an example, Meta is projected to see $68 billion of net income this year, but free cash flow could slide 25% to $40 billion. Investments of this magnitude need to pay off, especially considering the high valuations for these stocks. Time will tell if these investments work out for all these companies, but I must say I’m skeptical they will all be winners from this movement 5-10 years from now. Investors need to look at the full picture and understand all the moving parts, which includes how all the financial statements work together. At our firm we don’t just look at earnings, we also want to see good cash flow and a strong balance sheet. Producer Prices come in hotter than expected The Producer Price Index, also known as the PPI, showed prices in January climbed 0.4% compared to last month. This topped the expectation of 0.3% and led to an annual increase of 3.5%. Core PPI, which excludes food and energy, produced an annual gain of 3.4%, which was lower than last month’s reading of 3.5%. While these data points were a little hotter than expected, economists now have inputs to estimate the closely followed PCE report. It is interesting that after the release of the CPI and PPI, which were both higher than expected, estimates for core PCE actually look quite favorable. On a monthly basis core PCE is expected to show a 0.22% increase, which would be a nice deceleration from December’s reading of 0.45% and on annual basis estimates are looking for a reasonable 2.5% increase. We will have to see what the actual results look like for the PCE later this month, but with these reports now in hand I continue to believe that while inflation is not at the Fed target, I still don’t see it as a major problem. The True Cost of Credit Card Interest Everyone knows that paying credit card interest is a bad thing, but it’s less well known how that interest is accrued. Interest is calculated using an average daily balance method, which means every single purchase begins accruing interest immediately. Purchases made on a credit card throughout a monthly statement period increase the outstanding balance. After a month of spending, if the full statement balance is paid by the due date, which is generally 20 to 25 days after the statement period ends, no interest will be due, even though it was accruing during that time. This is known as the grace period which is essentially an interest-free loan on those purchases. For example, if you spend a total of $5,000 through a statement period during January, you will not need to make a $5,000 payment until the end of February to avoid any interest. However, if you do not make that full payment by the due date in February, your grace period is void and you will owe accrued interest from the date those purchases were made in January, not from the due date in February. Also, any additional purchases made in February and afterward begin accruing interest immediately without a grace period, even though those statement periods have not ended yet. Since interest is calculated using the average daily balance method, the unpaid balance and interest compounds on itself making it more and more difficult to pay off. Credit cards have a monthly minimum payment, which is usually $25 to $50 dollars, which paying prevents a mark on your credit report, but it does not stop interest from accruing. Credit cards can be a great tool as they can give you points and fraud protection, but those benefits are greatly outweighed when a balance is being carried. Companies Discussed: Dollar Tree, Inc. (DLTR), Grand Canyon Education, Inc. (LOPE), Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) & Phillips 66 (PSX)…

1
February 8th, 2025 | Job Openings, Jobs Growth, Climate Mutual Funds, Private Equity, 401(k) Loans, Fox Corporation (FOXA), PVH Corp. (PVH), Dollar General Corporation (DG) & (UPS) 55:40

منذ 29 يومًا55:40

55:40

Job openings post a sharp decline The Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey, also known as the JOLTs report, showed job openings of 7.6 million in the month of December. This was below the estimate of 8 million and the reading of 8.09 million in the month of November. While this may sound disappointing, this still leaves the ratio of open jobs to available workers at 1.1 to 1. A softening labor market is still not a bad thing considering it is coming from such a strong spot where workers have had an immense amount of power over employers for a couple of years. The Fed wants to make sure the labor market isn't too strong as it could cause inflationary concerns, so I actually see this as a positive considering it is still a good report, but not too strong. I still believe the labor market could soften further without it being problematic for the economy. Jobs growth still looks positive Although the nonfarm payrolls growth of 143,000 in the month of January missed the expectation of 169,000, I still see the number as healthy for a growing economy. This number also came after upward revisions of 100,000 for December and November. The January number was slightly off the average of 166,000 in 2024, but I would expect to see a lower total in 2025 given the fact that the unemployment rate is extremely healthy at 4%. I was surprised to see wage growth accelerate to 4.1% in the month, which was higher than last month’s reading of 3.9% and was at the highest level since May 2024 when it also registered 4.1%. At this level I wouldn’t say wage inflation is problematic, but I would say it is worth watching. If it reaccelerated to a higher level that could pose problems for the battle over inflation. I would say overall the job report looked healthy with no major surprises and for the most part it would point to a labor market that is continuing to soften, which I believe is good for our economy as a whole. Redemptions are high for climate mutual funds Climate mutual funds, sometimes called green funds, grew quite rapidly from 2019 through the beginning of 2024. Apparently, investors began realizing that the equity concentration in these mutual funds really hurt their returns in 2024. Redemptions of $30 billion means investors wanted to leave these climate sensitive mutual funds to invest elsewhere. It is estimated worldwide that climate focused mutual funds are approximately $534 billion. Redemptions of $30 billion is a pretty big hit considering that equates to around 5 to 6% of fund assets. Based on how times are changing, I believe going forward investors should not expect their returns to keep pace with the overall market. Another problem for investors is when redemptions in these funds are high, the fund manager must sell off assets to raise cash, perhaps at lower prices which can really hurt the performance of the fund going forward. This is because the stocks have been sold out of the portfolio to raise cash and if the stocks rebound, the fund performance will lag because of the missing equities that had to be sold. On the other side, if they sell positions with a gain, this will create tax consequences for investors. Behind the curtain of private equity Private equity over the last few years has become the cool thing in investing. Investors have been trying to get into private equity as an alternative asset, which I personally do not believe in because of the behind the curtain details no one knows what’s going on. Over the last 10 years, private equity assets have increase 300% to around $4 trillion. What’s even more amazing is that the fees collected by these private equity firms has increased 600%! A trade group by the name Institutional Limited Partners Association has had enough. They are pushing for new guidelines to standardize financial reporting for private equity investors including public pension plans, university endowments, and charitable foundations. What I thought was crazy is that private equity firms will vary how much they disclose to their clients based on how much they invest. The small investors will get less information than the bigger investors. In my opinion, it is not a wise place to put your money as I like to know what is going on with my investments. There are ways that the private equity firms are enhancing returns by using certain types of financial engineering as opposed to the old way of selling the companies they buy and returning cash to the investors. The most revealing thing I could find was the median fee that the small investors pay is somewhere around 2%. I have said many times in the past if your broker is trying to sell you or put you into the hot private equity market, I recommend saying no thank you and find another broker. Are 401(k) Loans a Good Idea? Taking a 401(k) loan may seem like an attractive option for quick access to cash, but it often comes with significant financial drawbacks that make it a bad idea. When you borrow from your 401(k), you are essentially taking money out of your retirement savings, which means losing potential investment growth and compounding returns that are crucial for long-term wealth accumulation. Although you repay yourself with interest, the interest rate is usually lower than what your investments could have earned if left untouched. Additionally, 401(k) loans must be repaid within a set timeframe, and if you leave your job, either voluntarily or involuntarily, the outstanding balance becomes due. Failure to repay results in it being treated as a distribution, triggering income taxes and, if you are under 59½, an additional 10% early withdrawal penalty, plus a 2.5% penalty in California. This can lead to a significant tax burden and further reduce your retirement savings. Moreover, and this is the biggest drawback in my opinion, when you repay the loan with interest, even though you are paying that interest to yourself, you are paying that interest with after-tax dollars which means you are being taxed twice. First you have to earn that money and pay taxes on it in order to pay the interest, and you are taxed again when you withdraw that money in retirement. Many people also fall into the trap of taking multiple loans, which can create a cycle of dependency and derail long-term financial security. While a 401(k) loan might seem like a convenient way to borrow, the risks of lost investment growth, tax consequences, and potential repayment difficulties make it an unwise financial move in most situations. Companies Discussed: Fox Corporation (FOXA), PVH Corp. (PVH), Dollar General Corporation (DG), United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS)…

1
February 1st, 2025 | 2025 Bank Earnings, DeepSeek News on AI, Custodians are not Fiduciaries, GDP Growth, Tax Time, Electronic Arts Inc. (EA), CSX Corporation (CSX), Dole PLC (DOLE), Juniper... 55:40

منذ 5 weeks55:40

55:40

What bank earnings reveal for 2025 Most big bank earnings are out now and the news and the guidance did lean on the positive side. A concern was revealed, which was no surprise to us that loan growth was only up 1.1% from a year ago. It is expected to see loan growth for 2025 of around 2.6%. Bank of America was the big winner here reporting loan demand grew 5 % from last year, but regional bank KeyCorp disappointed investors with their guidance as they are estimating loan balances would drop 2 to 5% in 2025. A positive in their report was net interest income would rise 20%. That was not good enough for the analyst community as the stock sold off following the report. Net interest income, also known as NII is the difference of what a bank pays for money and what they loaned it out at. This is a big factor when one is investing in banks considering it is such a large part of their profits. We have talked before that we do expect to see more mergers and acquisitions, also known as M&A going forward. This could help banks like KeyCorp and other smaller banks that go on sale as their stock drops, as there may be a floor to the fall with bigger banks potentially having some interest in scooping up the smaller banks as they go on sale. There are over 4500 banks in the United States, that is a lot of potential for bank M&A. Expected reductions in regulations for banking would also be a great benefit to Wells Fargo and some other banks as well. I do believe in having a strong balanced portfolio and if you don’t have some type of financial bank or financial institution in your portfolio, I believe you are missing out. DeepSeek news sends US AI stocks into freefall! DeepSeek AI is a Chinese artificial intelligence start up that rivals US companies like ChatGPT, Anthropic, and several others. DeepSeek has seen it’s popularity surge after releasing its reasoning model known as R1. This model apparently tops or is in line with the US competition and on Monday the DeepSeek app took over OpenAI’s spot for the most downloaded free app in the US. Many of you can probably guess my thoughts on this after my concerns with TikTok, but I do feel this is extremely dangerous and users must be careful in understanding what type of data they are giving to China. The main reason this news sparked panic in the markets was DeepSeek was apparently able to launch its free, open-source large language model in just two months at a cost of under $6 million. That is million with an M and that is important considering all these US businesses that are spending billions and billions of dollars on AI. The first big question here is was all that money a waste and is there a more efficient way to achieve AI success like DeepSeek? Also, there have been curbs to insure China didn’t receive the best chips. Did they steal trade secrets, find a way to get their hands on the chips, or most troubling would be, did they create their own technology that would rival a company like Nvidia? Personally, I was not too troubled by the decline on Monday considering we have no exposure to the AI space. I continue to believe it is just way too early to invest in this space and there could be other future competition that comes in that we don’t even know of yet. I do also believe this points to how fickle the market can be and with a news story like this being able to take down some of the most beloved winners from 2024, the extremely high valuations for the market should concern investors in the broad-based S&P 500 or Nasdaq. I am still looking for value stocks to do well in 2025, but could this be the beginning of a decline for these overpriced tech names? Custodians are not Fiduciaries, why that’s important to you? Your financial advisor may be a fiduciary, but their custodian might not be and it could cost you money. Being a fiduciary registered with the SEC for around 20 years now, we take seriously our obligation to always do what’s best for our clients. That also includes choosing a custodian to hold our clients’ assets. We spent a lot of time looking for the right fit to make sure our custodian doesn’t charge any unnecessary fees. This may come as a surprise to you, but not all custodians are the same. There are custodians that advisors use that may charge little fees like trading fees or maintenance fees that are passed on to you the client, that the advisor should make you aware of. Something recently came to light called an asset shift where some custodians encourage investment advisors to switch out of certain funds so that the custodian will make more money off of the assets they recommend. Unfortunately, this may not be best for the client and they may receive a lower yield. Keep in mind this is not illegal because the custodian does not have a fiduciary responsibility to do what is best for the client. Also, if the custodian forces the investment advisor to switch some funds into funds where the custodian will make more fees off of the new recommended fund, it could also cause a taxable situation for the client. This may be more prevalent in your smaller advisory firms with maybe fifty to hundred million dollars in assets under management. The custodian could tell the advisor either you need to increase your assets with us or begin paying an annual custody fee of anywhere from $200-$400 a year. That fee could really hurt the advisor, as an example if the advisor had 100 clients and they were charged $400 a year per client that would cost them $40,000 a year. More than likely, the advisor would probably have to raise their management fee to their clients to help offset the expense. Investors should ask their financial advisor, even if they are fiduciary if any of their recommendations are being forced by their custodian, which would cost you the client more money. I’m happy to report at our firm the custodian that we have chosen and have used now for ten years puts no pressure on us at all. This could be perhaps because we do have nearly $700 million in assets under management. GDP growth shows the consumer was still strong in Q4 Gross Domestic Product or GDP missed expectations for 2.5% growth in the fourth quarter, but the growth rate of 2.3% was still ok. For the full year we did see a small deceleration in growth as GDP growth fell from 2.9% in 2023 to 2.8% in 2024. While none of this sounds overly optimistic, the consumer really carried the GDP growth in Q4, which I see as positive. Personal consumption expenditures saw growth of 4.2% in Q4 thanks to growth of 6.6% for goods and 3.1% for services. It was surprising to see durable goods really saw nice growth of 12.1% in the quarter, which compared to nondurable goods growth of 3.8%. The miss compared to the expectations can largely be attributed to the change in private inventories as that subtracted 0.93% from the headline GDP number. This category is quite volatile and considering it subtracted 0.22% from the headline number in Q3, I would not be surprised to see it actually benefit the headline number in the first quarter of this year. Considering the strength of the consumer, I was actually quite pleased with this report and I believe it is a good sign for our economy as we look forward. I do believe we will see some bumps in the road this year, but I still think we should see GDP growth in the 2-3% range for the full year. Get Organized for Tax Time Tax season is upon us which means you are probably starting to receive tax documents that will be used to file your taxes. Whether you file taxes yourself, or work with a tax preparer, make sure you gather all the information needed and have at least some understanding of what it means. The tax documents alone do not always provide the information required to complete a tax return. For example, contributions to a traditional IRA can either be tax deductible or non-deductible, such as when making a backdoor Roth contribution. However, no tax form is generated to tell the tax preparer that a contribution was made at all which means the tax deduction would be missed, or your basis in the IRA would not be reported. In both cases you would be paying more tax than necessary. With tax-deferred retirement accounts anytime money is distributed, a 1099-r is generated, but it is not always clear whether the distribution is taxable or not. If the tax preparer is not aware that the 1099-r is from a direct or indirect rollover, a qualified charitable distribution, or the conversion from a non-deductible IRA, they may incorrectly report the distribution as taxable income. When you are gathering your documents, make sure you are gathering everything. If you have a taxable brokerage account, even if you didn’t withdraw any money, you will still receive a 1099 because any interest, dividends, or realized capital gains are reportable. If you have a mortgage, you will receive at least one 1098 and you may receive multiple. If you refinanced during the year or even if your mortgage was sold from one lender to another, which is quite common, you will receive a 1098 from each lender. If you don’t include all of them, you won’t receive your full interest deduction. Most people don’t like dealing with taxes and everyone hates paying them, but take the time to understand your situation enough so you don’t pay more than you need to. Companies Discussed: Electronic Arts Inc. (EA), CSX Corporation (CSX), Dole PLC (DOLE), Juniper Networks, Inc. (JNPR)…

1
January 25th, 2025 | Reduced Regulations for Businesses, Tariffs, Liquor Sales, Mortgages, Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST), Oracle Corporation (ORCL), The Walt Disney Company (DIS) & (GD) 55:40

منذ 6 weeks55:40

55:40

Businesses should do well with reduced regulations going forward Reducing regulations saves companies both time and money and time is always money. Starting in 2025, it is expected that for every new regulation that goes on the books, 10 regulations must be eliminated. I was unaware of what is known as the congressional review where a new President along with Congress can undo certain rules that the previous administration put on the books in the last few months. At this time, we’re not sure which ones will be eligible for elimination, but you will likely see some rules that perhaps made no sense to many people could be reversed in 2025. There could be a fight brewing between California and the federal government over some of these changes in regulations and California could lose their waiver and authority to ban the sale of new gasoline powered cars by 2035. The federal government wants control back over the auto industry, and does not want to allow states to come up with separate rules. That could ease pressure on both the auto companies and consumers as well. One that I’m not sure on is eliminating bank watchdogs like the FDIC. I like the idea of pulling back on the regulations, but maybe this is one that should be controlled not eliminated? Be prepared in 2025 for many changes in business, I believe most will be helpful. History has proven in the recent past that tariffs can cause problems in the economy and the markets as well. We have talked for the past month or so that we have been lightening up on our investments, which does not mean we went to 100% cash but a more reasonable level of around 20% in cash and 80% invested. A big reason for this is I believe currently the markets are incorrectly ignoring what the potential tariffs will do in the short term. It was only about six years ago when we had tariffs and that caused disruption in supply chains and rising manufacturing costs along with declining profits for some corporations. Our trading partners did not simply give in to the demands. Looking at China in particular, in September 2019, an additional $113 billion of tariffs were imposed on top of roughly $50 billion of tariffs that were already in effect. Each time the tariffs were raised, there was retaliation from China. This began to cause wild swings in the stock and bond markets. It is important as well for investors to understand when tariffs were imposed in 2018, the economy was doing well. That was because of recent tax cuts that reduced the corporate income tax from 35% down to 21%, which was a 40% decline. Now in 2025 there are no big tax cuts that the economy and businesses are benefitting from, which could hurt corporate profits in the short term. There is a potential tax relief bill that must go through Congress, but that would not be felt by anyone until the summer or late fall of this year. No one knows for certain how long it takes tariffs to benefit the economy because last time the world and trade fell apart as Covid changed everything. So for now, we will just have to wait and see how long it will take before the United States sees a benefit to tariffs, which I do believe long-term they are a good thing. With some potential short-term headwinds from these trade conversations, I think it’s important to not be overly aggressive with your portfolio and to make sure you’re holding strong businesses with low valuations that do not rely heavily on overseas trade. Liquor sales are declining and the bourbon boom seems to have passed It used to be investing in alcohol companies like Brown-Forman, who is famous for Jack Daniels, and other alcohol companies was a relatively safe investment over the long-term. But it appears that peoples liquor cabinets are still full from the Covid years when they over bought many types of booze for drinking at home and they still have a good amount of that alcohol left. No help to the industry is the anti- obesity drugs, the legal use of cannabis and some people switching to non-alcoholic drinks. The recent warning from the US Surgeon General recommending alcohol bottles should have a warning label on them about cancer could also hurt sales temporarily. We can’t forget about the tariffs that are coming as this will likely be another heavy weight on alcohol and bourbon sales and profits. While writing about the decline in bourbon sales, I thought I would go to my bar to see if I had any bourbon to try. I took a shot of it and it burned all the way down. I personally don’t know why Bourbon is so popular in the first place. With that said I guess maybe others are agreeing with me, US whiskey sales declined 1.2% in 2023, which was the first decline in 21 years. In the first nine months of 2024 there was additional drop of 4%. Your bigger distillers have the balance sheets to whether the storm, but your smaller craft distillery companies are beginning to close. I do believe this will probably change course maybe not in 2025, but perhaps come 2026 more distillers could quit the business, which will leave room for the big companies to pick up that slack and see their sales and profits increase. What Really Matters when Getting a Mortgage When getting a mortgage, everyone’s top priority is to get the best rate. However, it is equally as important to understand what it took to get that rate. When you get a mortgage, there are origination costs called points that you can buy to reduce your mortgage rate. In other words, you can buy down that rate for a cost, and this typically doesn’t get analyzed correctly. Let’s consider an example using current market rates. For a well-qualified buyer, the par rate is about 6.75%, meaning there are no added point costs. If the borrower wanted, they could pay a point, which costs 1% of the mortgage balance, in exchange for a lower rate of 6.375%. On a $600k loan, this point would cost $6,000. The question is, how long would it take for the interest savings from the lower rate to recoup the additional $6,000 point cost? In this example assuming a 30-year mortgage, it would take almost 3 years. That may not seem like a long time, but in the current interest rate environment, most experts agree that mortgage rates will be coming down at least slightly, especially within 3 years. This means if you forgo paying the point and accept the higher rate and higher accompanying monthly payment, as long as you are able to refinancing into a lower rate within 3 years, you will come out ahead. On the contrary by paying a point, you believe that right now mortgage rates are at their lowest point for the next 3 years, which is a strong stance to take. I believe there will be opportunities to refinance into lower rates, meaning the overall cheapest way to structure a mortgage now is with a higher interest rate. You can even take this a step further by accepting a rate above the par rate in exchange for credits from the lender that can be used to pay closing costs and some of the mortgage interest. In our $600k mortgage example, taking a rate of 7.125% would come with approximately $7,500 of credits. A rate of 7.125% might look expensive, but as long as you can refinance within 3 years, that rate option gives you the lowest overall cost of borrowing. Companies Discussed: Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST), Oracle Corporation (ORCL), The Walt Disney Company (DIS) & General Dynamics Corporation (GD)…

1
January 18th, 2025 | Millennials and Home Buying, Inflation, TikTok, Capital Gains and IRMAA, Moderna, Inc. (MRNA), Signet Jewelers Limited (SIG), Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC) & Qorvo, Inc.(QRVO) 55:40

منذ 7 weeks55:40

55:40

Millennials are a little gun shy on buying a home, but they have good reason to be concerned Looking back 30 to 40 years ago when families purchased a home, they did it as a place to raise a family and they weren’t so focused on how much money the house would be worth in the short term. Millennials who were born between 1981 to 1996 and are now between the ages of 29 and 44 years old are old enough to remember the 2008 Great Recession. In 2008 there were 2,330,483 foreclosures, roughly 3 times 2006 when it was 717,522. If at the time the young millennials who were between the ages of 12 and 27 were not affected personally by a foreclosure, it was likely they knew somebody who was. Fast forward 12 to 13 years and millennials have experienced a rapid increase in housing prices that is essentially unprecedented. Experiencing such a wide swing in boom-and-bust cycles is etched in some of these millennial’s minds. By the time baby boomers hit age 30 52% were homeowners versus 30-year-olds today at only 43%. Surveys show almost 50% of millennials have stated that owning a home is more trouble than it’s worth, which is nearly double the feelings of Gen X and baby boomers on homeownership. If millennial home ownership continues to decline, we could see an oversupply in future years, which would probably mean a fall in housing prices. Better than expected inflation fuels the market higher The Consumer Price Index, also known as CPI showed inflation was up 2.9% compared to last year. While this was in line with expectations, it was the core CPI annual rate of 3.2% that beat the expectation of 3.3% and likely excited the market. This report followed the Producer Price Index which was largely in line to slightly better than expectations. The annual rate for both headline and core PPI rose 3.3%. Looking closer at the CPI, shelter continued to be a heavyweight considering it makes up about one-third of the CPI. While it registered the smallest one-year gain since January 2022, it was still at a high rate of 4.6%. It’s important to point out that if shelter was excluded from the core CPI, the annual inflation rate was 2.1%, which is right in line with the Fed’s 2% target. I believe there will be a lot of movement in various price groups this year, especially with new government policies in place. With that said, I do believe it is much more likely we continue to move towards the 2% target rather than seeing a sustained reacceleration in inflation. This leads me to believe we will not see the Fed hike rates this year and I think it is still possible to see a couple rate cuts come December 31st, 2025. The Supreme Court ruled against TikTok, why you should agree with them! TikTok is very popular in America with 170 million people in the United States using the app. Many people love TikTok, but they don’t understand what the Supreme Court is seeing and why it unanimously confirmed the blocking of the app. It's important to understand the communist party of China ultimately has control of TikTok and that could be very dangerous as it believes in what was driven by Marxist Leninist ideology. The party believes that the CCP should silence dissent and restrict the rights and freedoms of Chinese citizens. This includes population control, arbitrary detention, censorship, forced labor, and very important pervasive media and Internet censorship. Do you really believe that China is our friend and they should be able to obtain data which they do on all the people using TikTok in the United States? Keep in mind that China does not allow Facebook or Instagram in their country. We would not let China own any of our major broadcasters because of the influence media can play and now social media also has that power. Think about this, China on a very low level begins to convince people in the US that it would be a good thing for China to take over Taiwan. Then, when they invade Taiwan, there’d be a backlash in the US of people who are siding with China against our government trying to keep Taiwan out of China’s hands. Taking over Taiwan would give China much more control and leverage over the United States. Think also about younger people today who post stuff that is there forever and when they are older it could be used against them as leverage. This could include future military leaders, perhaps members of our government or anyone else that when they became a more mature adult, they would not want those old posts to be released. I for one hope that TikTok is banned here in the United States or that it is purchased in full by a US company. At this point, China does not want that to happen because they do want to control the data and have access to it. What are your thoughts and why would you disagree with banning TikTok? Navigating Capital Gains and IRMAA If you are on Medicare or will be within the next two years, you will want to keep a close eye on your income because not only do you have to pay federal and state taxes on it, but you could also be forced to pay higher Medicare premiums because of it. This is called IRMAA which stands for Income-Related Monthly Adjustment Amount, and your Modified Adjusted Gross Income, or total income, determines if you will be subject IRMAA and how much you have to pay. This is basically an extra tax, but there are circumstances where it makes sense to pay it. Consider a situation where a married couple has income of $200,000 which means they are not yet triggering any extra Medicare premiums. If they happen to hold some stock that was purchased for $450,000 and has a current market value of $500,000, selling would realize a $50,000 capital gain, push them into the next IRMAA tier, and cause them to pay about $1,800 in extra Medicare premiums. Obviously, no one would want to pay an extra $1,800 if it is avoidable, but it may not be worth continuing to hold a $500,000 investment, especially if it’s an overconcentrated position or particularly risky. An extra cost of $1,800 is less than half a percent of $500,000, so any market volatility has the chance to wipe out much more than $1,800. We see people who are so concerned with IRMAA or paying other taxes that they never want to sell anything which causes them to lose more in the long run. Sometimes the best overall decision is to take profits and move on. Companies Discussed: Moderna, Inc. (MRNA), Signet Jewelers Limited (SIG), Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC) & Qorvo, Inc.(QRVO)…

1
January 11th, 2025 | JOLTs , Apple Intelligence, Tariffs, Catch-Up Contributions, Expand Energy Corporation (EXE), Paychex, Inc. (PAYX), Cintas Corporation (CTAS) & United States Steel Corporation (X) 55:40

منذ 8 weeks55:40

55:40

The job report was good, but why is that bad? Before we go into why the good report was bad, let’s talk about some of the data. The expected number of payrolls was 155,000, which came in well above that at 256,000 jobs for the month of December and also increased from November when it was 212,000 jobs. This high increase in payrolls caused unemployment to drop to 4.1% and came along with an increase in average hourly earnings of 0.3% for December. Over the last 12 months average hourly earnings have increased 3.9%, which is a decent number, but just under the expected growth in average hourly earnings. Job Growth was seen in healthcare with an increase of 46,0000 jobs. That was followed by leisure and hospitality which saw an increase of 43,000 jobs and government jobs, which includes Federal, state and local jobs were up 33,000. Because it was a holiday season there was an increase in retail jobs of 43,000 after the loss of 29,000 jobs in November. There are always revisions to the previous two months, but there was not much change here as October saw an increase of 7000 jobs and the November report was actually cut by 15,000 jobs which produced a total decline of only 8000 jobs for the past two months. Because the job report was so good compared to expectations, this put fear in the stock market and bond market that there may not be any interest rate cuts until the fall of this year. This also led to concerns that we could maybe see more inflation going forward. Maybe that makes sense for traders to sell, but investors should want a strong economy. That means your businesses will sell more goods and services and increase their profits. Interest sensitive equities like real estate were hit pretty hard with a good job report and banks also had a little trouble digesting the good report and declined as well. For investors I think this is a good report because it shows strength in the economy and based on the recent job openings from the JOLTS report, I think 2025 will be a good investment year for investors in fairly valued equities, but you will see a lot of scary volatility, which smart investors should use as a buying opportunity. Job openings report sends the market lower! The JOLTs report, which stands for Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey showed an impressive increase in job openings in the month of November to 8.096 million. This easily topped the estimate of 7.65 million and October’s reading of 7.839 million, which was revised upward from the initial number of 7.744 million. While this points to a labor market that has continued to remain strong, there were some indications of softening. On a year-over-year basis, job openings fell by 833,000 and the quits rate moved from 2.1% in October to 1.9% in November. This indicates workers are less confident in finding another job if they quit their current one, which should put less pressure on wage inflation. The resiliency in the labor market is concerning for those that are looking for more rate cuts as a strong labor market allows the Fed to be patient and wait for inflation to cool further. The news paired with a December US services sector report that showed faster-than-expected growth and higher prices paid caused the ten-year Treasury to climb to around 4.7%. This spooked many speculative areas of the market including technology and cryptocurrencies. Apple Intelligence, maybe not so intelligent? Apple’s AI system, also known as Apple Intelligence, has been having some issues and has been spreading fake news. One of the AI features for iPhones summarizes users’ notifications, but some of the news stories it has been summarizing has been completely inaccurate. It recently attempted to summarize a BBC News notification that falsely claimed British darts player Luke Littler had won the championship. Unfortunately, this came a day before the actual tournament’s final, which Littler did end up winning. Maybe Apple Intelligence is so good it can predict the future? This was not the only false story though as Apple Intelligence has now wrongly claimed that Tennis star Rafael Nadal had come out as gay, Luigi Mangione, the man arrested following the murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, had shot himself, and that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had been arrested. The BBC in particular has been trying for a month to get Apple to fix the problem. In response, Apple apparently told the BBC it’s working on an update that would add clarification that shows when Apple Intelligence is responsible for the text displayed in the notifications. This compares to the current situation where generated news notifications show up as coming directly from the source. To me this doesn’t sound like a good solution as it doesn’t solve the problem and most people likely wouldn’t read past the headline anyway. This could still make the news organizations look bad, which I’m sure they are trying to avoid. Personally, I’m still not seeing the need to upgrade to the new iPhone, especially if these new AI features don’t provide any value. From an investment standpoint, as you likely know we still believe Apple is extremely expensive trading at nearly 30x future earnings and would not recommend the stock at this time. The tariffs are coming, who could get hurt? The retail industry will take a big hit on profits. It is estimated that about 23% of durable consumer goods like refrigerators, washers and dryers are connected to imported goods. About 19% of non-durable goods such as diapers, clothing, shoes and towels have some sort of dependency on imported products. These could be slightly higher because the only data available was from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco that came out in a 2019 study. You may think that technology and the Mag Seven will be immune from the hit to profits, but even they could face problems. Nvidia has a 76% gross margin so they should be able to absorb most, if not all of any tariffs that come their way. Apple has half the gross profit margin of Nvidia at 37% and most of their products are built in China, which could be a huge dilemma for Apple. It is no guarantee but last time around the CEO of Apple, Tim Cook, was able to get an exemption on their products. Will that happen in 2025? That’s the big question. If they don’t get the exemption, their stock could take a massive hit that could be more than Apple investors have seen in a while. If you’re an Apple investor, you may want to use the sophisticated investing technique of crossing your fingers and anything else you’re able to cross as well and hope for the best. With the other Mag Seven such as Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon and Meta, their products are safe but keep in mind that combined they spent roughly $200 billion in capital expenditures in the most recent quarter and about 60% was on imported equipment. The other industry that could take a big hit would be carmakers, such as Ford, General Motors and Stellantis and we could see hits to the operating profits anywhere from 20 to 30%. The big fear here is the estimate is between 50 to 70% of parts for the popular cars sold in the U.S. come from Canada or Mexico. Experts estimate that the consumers will see about a 6% increase in the price of new cars sold here in the US. I can’t even imagine what the increase on the price of a car will be if it’s a full import like a Porsche, Maserati or Ferrari. The good news is that the economy in the US is far stronger than Europe, China and Mexico, so we can weather the storm and be in a better negotiating position than those countries. With that said, I do believe we will go through some pain before things get better. I also believe if you have equities with high valuations in your portfolio that are affected by the tariffs, they could take a much larger hit than your low valuation companies that pay dividends. Changes to Catch-Up Contributions Every year the contribution limits for retirement accounts increase. This year is a little different because one of the provisions from the Secure Act 2.0 is now active. If you are under the age of 50, your contribution limit for an employer sponsored retirement plan like a 401(k) is now $23,500, an increase of $500 from 2024. If you will be 50 or older by the end of the year, you may make an additional catch-up contribution of $7,500 which means your total contribution limit is now $31,000. However, starting in 2025 thanks to the Secure Act 2.0, if you are between the ages of 60 and 63, you may make a catch-up contribution of $11,250 rather than $7,500, meaning your total contribution limit is $34,750. This age range is based on how old you will be at the end of the year, so if you are turning 60 this year, you are eligible to contribute the entire $34,750. However, if you are currently 63 but will be turning 64 this year, you may only contribute $31,000. If you are wanting to max out your retirement plan, make any necessary adjustments to your payroll contributions now so you don’t have to scramble at the end of the year. This addition catch-up contribution was implemented to help older workers prepare for retirement, but I don’t see how this will make much of a difference for anyone. It increases the contribution limit by $3,750 for 4 years, which is a total of $15,000. An extra $15,000 is not going to make or break anyone’s retirement, especially considering we already the option of funding non-retirement investment accounts after maxing out retirement accounts. Companies Discussed: Expand Energy Corporation (EXE), Paychex, Inc. (PAYX), Cintas Corporation (CTAS) & United States Steel Corporation (X)…

1
January 4th, 2025 | Fraud, Airline Stocks, Private Prison Boom, Social Security Changes, Tidewater Inc (TDW), Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ), Carvana Co. (CVNA) & VeriSign, Inc. (VRSN) 55:40

منذ 9 weeks55:40

55:40

Watch out for record fraud when shopping. With technology, shopping has become so easy and set records in 2024 of around $5.3 trillion. While this by itself is a problem as some people are over shopping, it has also invited more fraud than ever before and for the first three quarters of 2024 there was an increase of 14.5% to $8.7 billion of shoppers who lost money to fraud. Two things are happening here. First, consumers may be too emotionally excited about the purchase and they forget to look for scams that could be happening to them. The second item is the scammers are becoming smarter about how to scam people and they are making it more difficult to detect. To avoid being scammed, it is always wise to deal with a company that you know. However, even that may not guarantee your safety. Scammers can now use names that look very similar to the names you know. They can do this by simply adding or deleting a period or a letter somewhere in the title. So before you make that purchase, be sure it is the correct site that you want to be at and you’re not sending your money to some scammer from across the world! Should you be investing in airline stocks with the record year they’ve had? It has been quite the year for airline stocks and there have been huge one-year gains for United Airlines at 138% and Delta Airlines at 49%. While it was a laggard compared with its peers, American Airlines still posted a strong return of 29%. It is forecasted for holiday travel between December 19th and January 6th, there will be a record number of travelers at 54 million. Since our economy was reopened after Covid, consumers continue to enjoy traveling, which has benefited the airlines. Even with the record number of travelers and the large gains for the airline stocks, they still trade at reasonable price to earnings ratios of 9.7 for United Airlines, 10.1 for Delta and 10.5 for American Airlines. My concern is could this be a value trap going forward? The low price to earnings ratio might suck you in only to see a slowdown in travelers in 2025. We could also see a little bit higher oil prices based on production not coming online quick enough to keep up with demand, which would hurt the profit margins for these companies. While they might look enticing, I wouldn’t be interested in adding these positions to my portfolio at this time. Could you benefit from the private prison boom that may happen in 2025? In 2025 there could be a huge demand for detention centers and investors may benefit from investing in the private detention center called CoreCivic Inc, trading under the symbol CXW. CoreCivic has a market cap of about $2.4 billion and a FFO on a forward basis of $1.79. The company could benefit from recent statements from ICE saying it will need enough beds to detain a minimum of 100,000 migrants. The agency already has funding for 41,500 beds. Their competitor GEO has a head start already housing about 40% of ICE detainees. It should be noted that CoreCivic was at $14 the day before the election and it climbed to $22 the day after. There was concern that some banks would withdraw funding from companies who participated in the immigrant detentions, however it appears that CoreCivic does not need any new capital to bring on new facilities or bring back idle facilities. The high estimate for deportation would be 1 million people in one year at a cost of $88 billion. It is estimated that there were 11 million undocumented migrants in the US as of 2022. These higher dollars could benefit the private prisons as a quick alternative if there is no room in the county jails. I was disappointed that the company does not pay a dividend, but it has pulled back from a recent high of $24.99 a share to under $22 a share. At the price the stock would trade at a reasonable 12.29x the estimated FFO for 2025. An executive from the private company GEO group spoke about an unprecedented opportunity for their company, it could be a good investment opportunity for the small investor as well. “Big Social Security Changes Coming” The Social Security Fairness Act is set to be signed into law next week and will impact Social Security benefits for millions of Americans. This bipartisan bill will eliminate the “Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP)” and the “Government Pension Offset (GPO)” which currently reduce social security benefits for workers and spouses who have public pensions. The Windfall Elimination Provision applies when someone has worked a job where they paid into Social Security and also a job where they did not pay into Social Security and receive a pension instead. In this case, the Social Security benefits are reduced based on how many years they paid into Social Security. The Government Pension Offset applies when a spouse is entitled to a Social Security spousal or widow benefit but they also worked a job where they did not pay into Social Security themselves. In this case, the amount of their pension reduces the Social Security benefits they are entitled to receive. With the passing of this new Social Security act and the elimination of the WEP and GPO, Americans who were having Social Security benefits reduced will no longer see a reduction. This is one of the largest changes to Social Security in the last several years. The downside is, the increased benefits will cause the Social Security trust fund to run out sooner, even if the elimination results in a fairer benefit system. Companies Discussed: Tidewater Inc (TDW), Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ), Carvana Co. (CVNA) & VeriSign, Inc. (VRSN)…

1
December 28th, 2024 | Oil Demand, Understanding Compounding, AI Stocks, Double and Triple Taxation, Macy's, Inc (M), Xerox Holdings Corporation (XRX), PepsiCo, Inc (PEP) &Mastercard Incorporated (MA) 55:40

منذ 10 weeks55:40

55:40

We could see a huge increase in oil demand in 2025! With oil trading under $70 a barrel, gas prices have continued to fall. But unless the world starts producing more oil in 2025, we could see a big reversal in the price of oil. I base that on an estimate from the International Energy Agency as they expect a huge increase in the demand of oil. They are estimating oil consumption of 1.1 million barrels per day, which would be a 31% increase from the 840,000 barrels in 2024. I know from recent reports that there is concern that if we pump more oil, the price could drop dramatically causing difficulties and lower profits for oil companies. However, if the International Energy Agency is correct on their 31% increase in oil demand, that could actually cause shortages at certain times throughout the year. Also, it is somewhat amazing with how long electric vehicles have been out that they still don’t seem to be having at this time much of an impact. I do know that car manufacturers are having some difficulty selling their inventory of electric vehicles. I believe part of this is because of the abundance of oil on the market and low gas prices. Is it possible that we got too aggressive trying to build and force consumers into electric vehicles? What happens if in 2025 the federal tax incentives for electric vehicles go away? Understanding compounding is why you should be cautious about the overvalued market! Investing is great when everything is going up and the emotions tell you to stay the course because that will continue to happen. For two years now the S&P 500 has posted really strong gains because of a heavy concentration in the Mag Seven. There are now investors who say the market could be up another 20% in 2025. In our portfolio we will continue to remain cautious next year as we understand that compounding can work for you, but also against you. What do we mean by that? Let’s say that for three years the S&P 500 is up 20% per year, your $100,000 investment would grow to $172,800 because of compounding. You probably would feel pretty good about that and think it will to continue to increase. While it is possible it’s like riding a roller coaster. What I mean by that is if you’ve ridden a roller coaster you know as it gets to the very top, it slows down and it feels like it’s almost going to stop, then you go over that peak and you hit that big decline. That happened in 1935 and 1936 as big gains were followed by a 39% decline in 1937. I did not want to use 2002 when the S&P 500 had lost almost 50% of its value. I thought I would use something else from history that was not the worst-case scenario. Back to the three-years of 20% gains and a portfolio value of $172,800. If we saw a 39% loss again like 1937, your account value will drop all the way down to $108,864. You might be questioning how can that be? It’s because as your account grew in value the percent decline is now on a bigger amount than the initial $100,000 you started with. So in other words after four years of investing, you’re $100,000 investment was only up 8.9%. This is why for long-term investors I can continue to stay the course on a more conservative investment style and not try to figure out what the top is for many of these expensive companies. The other problem as well is once people lost 37% of the money on their investment, they would probably leave the stock market for years missing future gains. I can tell you many people think they know where the top is and they’ll get out in time, but unfortunately many people stay at the party too long. I can tell you managing money through the tech boom and bust many people thought the party would continue in the early 2000’s and they did not foresee the major declines that we saw during the tech bust. AI stocks performed well in 2024, there are problems in 2025 that could cause a reversal It is estimated that for every dollar invested on the AI infrastructure, revenue of four dollars needs to be produced. The AI leader so far has been Microsoft with their Copilot product that has a cost of $360 per user each year. At first glance that doesn’t sound too bad until you realize you still have to pay for the other software at a cost of anywhere from a low of $72 to over $650 per year. At $1000 is the AI expense worth the reward? Currently, there are places where you can get AI for free, will people be willing to pay for AI when they’re used to getting it at no expense? In a combined survey on using AI, 32% of respondents had used it in the previous week. This is a fast adoption rate compared to the Internet or the introduction of the PC. However, when asked what services they were using, most were using free services like open AI’s ChatGPT or Google’s Gemini. If people won’t pay directly for AI, then the companies will have to somehow monetize it through some means of advertising. Another big question is will AI really produce results in productivity? In the last couple of years, the US Bureau of Labor Statistics reported labor productivity has risen at an annual rate of 2.3%, which is 3/10 of a percent higher than the historical average. To make AI valuable we would have to see labor productivity increase to at least 2.5 to 2.6%. One question on many people’s mind is will AI replace a lot jobs? The answer to that question is it will replace jobs, but the hope is new jobs and opportunities will be created that we have not even thought of yet. They will likely require creativity, judgment and decision-making. I still think AI will be used and it is not going anywhere, but I worry the hype has carried many stocks to excessive valuations. 2025 may be a prove it year for AI and if we don’t see progress towards monetization those AI stocks could struggle! Beware of Double and Triple Taxation At the end of the year, it is helpful to check where your income stands so any last-minute adjustments can be made. These might be Roth conversions, IRA withdrawals, capital gain harvesting, capital loss harvesting, charitable donations, or retirement contributions to name a few. Before making any adjustments though, you need to fully understand the tax consequence of the transaction. Income activity like IRA withdrawals or pensions are fairly straightforward as they are considered ordinary income on the federal and state level. Income from Social Security or long-term capital gains and qualified dividends can be a little more complicated. Of the Social Security you receive, some is taxable and some is tax free. At most, 85% of Social Security benefits is reportable as income but it can be as low as 0%. The more other income you have, the more your Social Security will be taxed. Long-term capital gains and qualified dividends are subject to a different set of tax brackets and the tax is calculated after ordinary income sources are considered. Depending on your level of income, capital gains and dividends fall into either a 0%, 15%, or 20% bracket. What this means is by making one adjustment that increases your income, you could trigger more of your Social Security to be taxed and push capital gains into a higher tax bracket, resulting in a triple taxation event. For example, Roth conversions are popular at the end of the year, especially when taxable income is in the 12% tax bracket, but this doesn’t mean everyone should do it. You might be making a conversion that is taxed at 12%, but that also results in thousands of additional dollars from Social Security that were tax free to become taxable, and the income from the conversion and Social Security push capital gains that were in the 0% bracket into the 15% bracket. When added up that conversion at 12% ended up being taxed at over 37% because of the chain reaction of taxes, not including any state income taxes. In this situation it probably makes sense to find ways to reduce income instead. Year-end tax adjustments can be very helpful, but you want to make the right adjustments based on your situation. Companies Discussed: Macy's, Inc (M), Xerox Holdings Corporation (XRX), PepsiCo, Inc (PEP) & Mastercard Incorporated (MA)…

1
December 21, 2024 | Investing, Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBM), Stock Market Fall, Funding an HSA, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX), RH (RH), Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) & Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY) 55:40

منذ 11 weeks55:40

55:40

Is investing just looking too good these days? When everything is going up including stocks, commodities and cryptocurrencies, one has to stop and think is this the top? In November US equity trading increased by 38% compared to November 2023. The last time we saw this type volume was in 2021 when meme stocks were the major craze. The CEO of Robinhood, Vlad Tenev, stated a few weeks ago that they’re looking at expanding into sports betting. In my opinion that is not a far stretch from what they’re doing now. Over the past year, their stock has climbed 235% and it trades under the symbol HOOD. Polling by the US conference board on the bullishness of investors revealed that consumers expectations for equities compared to their own income has never been higher. Funny thing when I was drafting this post and I tried to put in bullishness, the auto spellchecks corrected it with foolishness. I would have to agree with the spellcheck on that. Lastly, I can’t help but comment on the most ridiculous thing in crypto I have seen yet. There is now a cryptocurrency and please excuse my language called Fartcoin that has a market value of over $900 million. Comparing that to something of value, that is greater than nearly 40% of all American publicly traded companies. Remember, if you are speculating, Wall Street will always have some type of crazy investment that they’ll make a lot of money off of, but yet in the end, you the speculator investor will more than likely lose big if not all your investment. It may be exciting for a while, but eventually the emotional roller coaster will wear on you. Are pharmacy benefit managers, known as PBMs, costing consumers? If you go back to the early 60s, PBMs were the heroes because they helped reduce and control spending on prescription drugs. Back then drug companies were charging high prices and the PBMs came in and negotiated contracts for large purchases of drugs so the drug companies would not have to fill an order of 20 pills. Instead, through a PBM the drug companies could fill an order of say maybe 20,000 pills and charge much less. The consumer received lower prices on drugs, the drug company made a good profit, and the PBM took a slice of the pie. The reason we receive such great prices at Costco on all items is because they buy large quantities of products and pass the savings on to the consumer. Obviously, Costco doesn’t pass all the benefit to the consumer and they keep part of the cost savings as a profit. Not to mention they also charge a subscription fee to gain access to these savings. This is the same way PBMs operate, they keep part of the discount or the spread for themselves so they can make profits. What all the hoopla is about is that the PBMs don’t show the discount or the spread that they are receiving. The FTC, also known as the Federal Trade Commission, already regulates PBMs to ensure compliance with antitrust and consumer protection laws. There’s also concern that six PBMs control roughly 90% of the market. I personally think that is OK especially when you compare it to how many options you have for your cell phone or cell phone service. There are many other services or products where you ultimately have limited options. Stock market falls after disappointing Fed comments It was widely anticipated the Federal Reserve would cut the Fed Funds Rate by a quarter of a point to a target range of 4.25%-4.5%. While the Fed followed through on those expectations and lowered the rate back to the level where it was in December 2022, it was the projection for 2025 that moved stocks lower. The Fed indicated it would probably only lower rates twice in 2025. This projection is based on the dot plot which is a matrix of individual members’ future rate expectations. Personally, I’m not a fan of the dot plot as Fed expectations have been wildly off in the last few years and the latest dot plot cuts in half the committee’s intention when the plot was last updated in September. I believe it is just too hard to predict out what inflation will be for the longer term, which then makes it difficult to get a gauge on where interest rates will be over the next few years. Given the current data I can see why the Fed wants to be patient, but the problem as we all know is data can change. If inflation does start to decelerate further next year it is absolutely possible the Fed cuts maybe four times instead of the current estimate of two cuts. The main takeaway I have from this meeting is the Fed is not on an aggressive rate cut cycle and they are going to be data dependent. Ultimately, the market did not like what Powell said and stocks fell greatly during his press conference. This led to another down day for the Dow Jones, which marked the 10th straight losing day. This is the longest losing streak since 1974 when the Dow fell 11 days straight. I do believe with the excessive valuations there will be continued volatility in the markets, but I do see this as an overreaction to the Fed comments and we still see great upside for several companies in next years market. Should you Fund a Health Savings Account? A Health Savings Account (HSA) is an investment account that is primary used for medical expenses but also doubles as a retirement account. Contributions to an HSA are tax deductible and can be invested. Investment earnings in an HSA grow tax deferred and may be withdrawn tax free to cover medical expenses at any age, you do not need to wait until retirement. You may also reimburse yourself for out-of-pocket medical expenses at any point for expenses that occurred while you had an HSA. For example, if you paid for some medical expense in 2024 but chose not to withdraw from your HSA to cover it, you could keep those funds growing tax free and withdraw them in 2030 or any other future year. Unlike Flexible Spending Accounts where funds must be used every year, balances in Health Savings Accounts rollover each year indefinitely, which is why they can be great retirement accounts. If you make a withdrawal that is not for medical expenses, it is taxable and comes with at 20% penalty. At age 65 you may withdraw funds for any reason without penalty, but it is still taxable if not used for medical expenses, so you really just want to use these for medical expenses to avoid taxes and penalties. In retirement there are typically plenty of medical expenses like Medicare premiums and elder care, so it is usually not a problem to withdraw all the funds tax free. An HSA account must be paired with a high deductible health plan (HDHP) and in 2024 the annual maximum contribution is $4,150 for a self-only plan and $8,300 for family plans. If you are over 55 you can make an extra $1,000 catch-up contribution. HSA accounts can be funded through payroll if your employer offers them or you can open your own account as long as you have a qualifying plan. It is more tax advantageous to fund through payroll though because not only are contributions pre income tax, they are also pre–Social Security and Medicare tax which is an extra 7.65% savings. Unfortunately, California does not recognize HSA accounts which means contributions are not deductible at the state level and earnings are taxable. However, these are still extremely tax efficient and useful accounts and are not utilized enough. Companies Discussed: Netflix, Inc. (NFLX), RH (RH), Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) & Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY)…

1
December 15th, 2024 | Upcoming Stock Market Correction, Oil Drilling Technology, Inflation, Charitable Gifts, The Cigna Group (CI), The Kroger Co. (KR), The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (PNC).. 55:40

منذ 12 weeks55:40

55:40

You should be prepared for the upcoming stock market correction! At Wilsey Asset Management we are prepared for an upcoming correction in the stock market. That doesn’t mean we or you should sell all your positions and go to cash. What it does mean is you should take a close look at your portfolio and see if you’re over concentrated in certain positions, especially those that are trading at lofty valuations based on earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow. Many investors think that their stock or stocks will never decline and will just keep increasing forever. This is because they have no history or way of valuing what they hold in their portfolio. They are just happy because it keeps going up, which is obviously unsustainable. It is important for investors to realize that roughly every 19 months or so stocks go through a correction of 10% or more. If you look back in history, the last correction we had was roughly 20 months ago in March 2023 because of the regional banking crisis. What will cause the next correction? It could be concerns on tariffs, it could be due to global unrest, or perhaps it will be something that no one even thought of. The average correction lasts 3 to 4 months, but investors should be prepared for a longer period because an average is simply the average, and it will not be the same for every correction. Mentally, investors should be prepared for corrections, and they should understand it is not a matter of if it will it happen, but when it will happen, and you should not be emotionally disappointed when it does happen. As an investor, you have to realize it does happen, but if you have a strong diversified portfolio with investments that you understand you can weather the storm. If most of your stocks in the portfolio pay dividends that might make you feel better and also the income helps offset a potential decline in your portfolio. Also think like famed investor Warren Buffett that when a correction happens many equities go on sale and that is time to start buying. Don’t, however, buy with the intention that you make money in the next month or two. Realize that you’re buying a small piece of large company on sale that should do well for you in years to come. Technology has changed and improved oil drilling Thanks to advancements in technology and artificial intelligence, the United States now out produces any other country in the world when it comes to oil. Much of the success has come from the Permian Basin which is 75,000 square miles located in Texas and New Mexico. The area produces almost 50% of US oil. There have been huge efficiency advantages in US oil production which have increased 60% or more a day while using 40% less workers. It used to take 18 months to find oil when drilling in the ocean with seismic imaging. Thanks to advances in technology, it now takes only 18 days. Companies like Chevron also claim they can drill 80% more feet in a day than they did five years ago. When you think of oil drilling, you may think of the new show Landman on Paramount+ and all the dirty oil. While that is still part of it, it is to a much smaller degree because now there are workstations with computers and 20 to 30 workers controlling thousands of pieces of equipment from many miles away. All this new efficiency will benefit the consumer as this will stabilize oil prices to some degree. I believe this will occur because the breakeven for oil in the Permian has dropped over 50% to $40 a barrel and could fall even further. What this means is more and stable profits for the oil companies. The consumer will benefit as well as oil companies cost decline and the price of gasoline at the pump could decline further. Should we start to question the progress on inflation? The November Consumer Price Index (CPI) came in at 2.7%, which was in line with expectations but higher than October’s reading of 2.6%. Core CPI, which excludes food and energy came in at 3.3%, which also matched expectations. The concern here is that this was the sixth month in a row that we have been at 3.3 or 3.2%. I have spent a lot of time talking about shelter costs, but those are finally starting to decelerate. The shelter index showed a gain of 4.7% compared to last year and while it still accounted for 40% of the monthly CPI increase, it was the smallest 12-month increase since February 2022. I continue to believe this index will continue to decelerate moving forward. The big question here is should we be concerned with this report? It looks like since it came in right along expectations the market is now with near certainty pricing in a cut at the Fed’s meeting next week. I do have to say though it is somewhat concerning we are still a decent ways off from the Fed’s target and it appears we have stalled out. We have come a long way from when the CPI was 9% in June 2022, but I believe if the Fed sticks to being “data dependent” they will want to see further progress before cutting rates much further next year. There are still some positives with areas like shelter and auto insurance that should be less burdensome next year, but other areas like energy will have a tough comparison considering the lower prices this year. Overall, I continue to believe the economy is in a good spot, but this report confirms my thoughts that those hoping for a lot of rate cuts next year may be getting too far ahead of themselves. Make your Charitable Gifts Count this Season If you currently receive required minimum distributions (RMDs) from a retirement account and you make charitable donations, you should be using your required distributions to make those charitable gifts. This is called a qualified charitable distribution (QCD) and it is a tax advantaged way to make the donations to charity that you were already doing. After the tax changes in 2017, the number of tax filers who itemize dropped substantially. Charitable donations are typically an itemized deduction, so for the majority of tax filers, charitable gifts do not provide any tax benefit. When taking a required distribution from a retirement account, the distribution is reportable as income. However, any required distribution that is instead sent to a charity does not need to be recognized as income, meaning the giver is guaranteed to receive both the federal and state income tax benefit, even if they don’t itemize. Not only that, but since the charitable distribution is not included in income, it results in a lower adjusted gross income which is the income level that determines the cost of Medicare premiums (IRMAA). A normal itemized charitable donation only reduces taxable income, not adjusted gross income, so even people who itemize are still better off making qualified charitable distributions rather than itemized charitable donations. These QCDs are a great way to help a cause you believe in while getting the most tax benefits possible. Companies Discussed: The Cigna Group (CI), The Kroger Co. (KR), The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (PNC) & The Hershey Company (HSY)…

1
December 7th, 2024 | Job openings, labor markets, Holiday spending, 24 hours Trading, Tax Problems with Overconcentrated Portfolios, Intel Corporation (INTC), Target Corporation (TGT), The Gap, Inc... 55:40

منذ 13 weeks55:40

55:40

Job openings remain strong, what does that mean for our economy? The Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey, also known as the JOLTs Report, showed job openings of 7.74 million in the month of October topped expectations of 7.5 million and increased from September’s reading of 7.4 million. While it was nice to see the increase, I wouldn’t be surprised to see job openings decline further from here. Openings peaked in March 2022 at over 12 million and have been on the decline since then. While that may sound problematic, these numbers were greatly distorted by the Covid shutdown and then the reopening that followed. We had never seen more than 8 million job openings pre Covid and at the peak there were more than two job openings for every available worker. We still have a very healthy labor market considering there are still 1.1 available positions for every unemployed worker. I would actually say the labor market is in an even healthier place at this point in time. With the excessive amount of openings, we saw a lot of employee turnover and quits which I believe led to elevated wage inflation. The labor market is much more balanced at this point in time, which should lead to less concerns over wage inflation. This should then be positive for the overall inflation rate which the Fed has been battling the last couple of years now. The labor market continues to produce strong results! November payrolls showed a very nice increase of 227,000, which topped the estimate of 214,000. The two prior months also saw positive revisions with October now showing gains of 36,000 versus 12,000 and September showing an impressive growth of 255,000 versus 223,000. While the November gain may look quite strong, it’s important to put this in perspective and pair it with the weak October report. October was challenged as it was held back by impacts from Hurricane Milton and the Boeing strike. This essentially reduced the jobs in the October report and added them to the November report. If we instead look at an average of October and November, we would then see growth of 131,500, which is still strong but not nearly as impressive as the November headline number. Areas of strength in the report included health care and social assistance which was up 72,300, leisure and hospitality which was up 53,000, and government which was up 33,000. While the government number includes state, local, and federal, I am curious to see what these numbers look like next year with Elon Musk and DOGE taking a closer look at government spending. Instead of consistent gains from this sector, we could potentially see a decline in payrolls. Utilities which saw a decline of 100 and retail trade which saw a decline of 28,000 were the only areas that produced a negative result in the month. I was surprised to see retail trade on the list considering the busy holiday season, but it is believed the later Thanksgiving holiday had a big impact. With the report largely in line, expectations for a Fed rate cut jumped to nearly 90% when they meet on December 17th and 18th. At this point, I would be very surprised if they didn’t do a quarter point cut at that meeting. I do believe after that cut though, there could be a pause until we see further data. Holiday spending is looking positive We have now been seeing predictions for what spending will look like for the holiday season. It’s no surprise to me those numbers are looking pretty good with estimates for spending to increase somewhere between 3.8 and 4%. These estimates should be confirmed or may even be a little light with the success of the post-Thanksgiving deals. Data from Mastercard showed Black Friday retail sales, excluding automotive, increased 3.4% compared to last year. This came with a huge increase of 14.69% for online shopping compared to an increase of just 0.7% for in-store sales. According to Adobe Analytics, Cyber Monday then set a record with $13.3 billion of sales. This was an increase of 7.3% compared to last year. Overall, Adobe Analytics showed online spending for the Cyber Five rose 8.2% year over year to $41.1 billion. The spending looks good for a few different reasons. First, the election is finally over. Based on what I was reading, I believe people really stopped spending because of their uncertainty of what direction they thought our country would be heading. Now that the election is over, consumers are benefiting from and feeling good about a strong stock market that has done well this year and we still seem to be getting some price appreciation on our homes. According to the conference board, their recent report showed the strongest monthly gain in consumer confidence in over three years. We will continue to keep you informed and updated on holiday spending, but based on what I’m seeing I do expect consumer spending for the holiday season to have a strong increase from last year and perhaps when we see the real numbers in January, they could come in higher than those estimates! Trading stocks 24 hours a day is coming soon! With technology today I believe it will definitely happen, but the question is when? I think a more important question is do we really want it? Currently the market trades from 9:30 in the morning until 4 o’clock in the afternoon Eastern standard time. There is also currently low volume in after-hours trading. Companies like Robinhood and even Charles Schwab allow for trading of some equities after hours in a lite market. I have been managing money now for over 40 years and I’ve seen the good and the bad. What worries me is this could become too much stress for some people to handle. I can see people waking up at 2 o’clock in the morning to check to see whether their stock is trading up or down and this could become a regular habit which could happen anytime at night. It would also allow people to make impulsive decisions since you have your phone with you 24 hours a day. Once that trade is made it’s done in terms of its financial impact but will you then worry about it and not be able to sleep? Investing can cause a toll on your emotions and I think having that break from 4 PM until the next morning at 9:30 gives your body and mind an emotional break. If you’re a trader and you’re gambling you probably don’t care much about reading the news or digesting the most recent earnings release before making any financial decisions, but if you are a true investor and you invest for the longer term you don’t need 24 hours a day to trade. You will use the break to read and analyze your decisions because you want to do your research before buying or selling. Be careful what you wish for! Tax Problems with Overconcentrated Portfolios We’ve seen many cases where someone has a lot of unrealized capital gains in a taxable investment account and they are afraid to sell anything because they don’t want to pay taxes. This is more common with older people because they might have bought something decades ago that has appreciated substantially. Because of this appreciation, one position or a small number of positions may make up the majority of their entire portfolio resulting in a lack of diversification and a much higher level of risk. In turn they feel backed into a corner because selling results in taxes but holding continues the investment risk. There are many ways to deal with this such as charitable remainder trusts or collar strategies, but before any of that it is important to understand what that tax impact actually is, because in many cases it is not as bad as people think. Selling a long-term investment result in a capital gain which is reportable income, but long-term capital gains are taxed at lower rates than ordinary income like wages or IRA withdrawals. In many cases, that tax rate can be as low as 0%. For an elderly married couple who claims the standard deduction, if their total income, including long-term capital gains, is less than $126,350, those gains are taxed at 0%. If their income exceeds that level, only the capital gains above the threshold are taxed at the higher rate of 15%. This is important to know because we’ve spoken with people who have some social security income, maybe some RMDs, and a little interest income, but their adjusted gross income is only $80,000 and they are worried about selling stock and paying taxes on gains. What they don’t realize is they can handle over $46,000 of additional capital gains without paying any federal income taxes on them. They may be perpetually carrying an unnecessary level of risk in their overconcentrated investment portfolio because they are so worried about taxes when they have the ability to liquidate and diversify a portion of their portfolio every year tax free. By better understanding their tax situation, they can be more informed about making investment decisions. Companies Discussed: Intel Corporation (INTC), Target Corporation (TGT), The Gap, Inc. (GAP)…

1
November 27, 2024 | Educational show where Brent and Chase Wilsey discuss fundamental analysis and how they use it to manage their $700M portfolio 55:40

منذ 14 weeks55:40

55:40

مرحبًا بك في مشغل أف ام!

يقوم برنامج مشغل أف أم بمسح الويب للحصول على بودكاست عالية الجودة لتستمتع بها الآن. إنه أفضل تطبيق بودكاست ويعمل على أجهزة اندرويد والأيفون والويب. قم بالتسجيل لمزامنة الاشتراكات عبر الأجهزة.

الاستماع إلى +500 موضوع

مشابه لـSmart Investing with Brent & Chase Wilsey

Apple AirPods Pro 2 Wireless Earbuds, Active Noise Cancellation, Hearing Aid Feature, Bluetooth Headphones, Transparency, Personalized Spatial Audio, High-Fidelity Sound, H2 Chip, USB-C Charging

The Let Them Theory: A Life-Changing Tool That Millions of People Can't Stop Talking About

everydrop by Whirlpool Ice and Water Refrigerator Filter 1, EDR1RXD1, Single-Pack , Purple

المدونة الصوتية تستحق الاستماع

Smart Investing with Brent & Chase Wilsey

Smart Investing with Brent & Chase Wilsey

المدونة الصوتية تستحق الاستماع

مرحبًا بك في مشغل أف ام!

The Let Them Theory: A Life-Changing Tool That Millions of People Can't Stop Talking About

The Let Them Theory: A Life-Changing Tool That Millions of People Can't Stop Talking About

Sweet Dreams (feat. Miguel)

Fit Simplify Resistance Loop Exercise Bands with Instruction Guide and Carry Bag, Set of 5

The Let Them Theory: A Life-Changing Tool That Millions of People Can't Stop Talking About

مشابه لـSmart Investing with Brent & Chase Wilsey

دليل مرجعي سريع