Player FM - Internet Radio Done Right
27 subscribers
Checked 3h ago
تمت الإضافة منذ قبل six عام
المحتوى المقدم من Atheist Community of Austin. يتم تحميل جميع محتويات البودكاست بما في ذلك الحلقات والرسومات وأوصاف البودكاست وتقديمها مباشرة بواسطة Atheist Community of Austin أو شريك منصة البودكاست الخاص بهم. إذا كنت تعتقد أن شخصًا ما يستخدم عملك المحمي بحقوق الطبع والنشر دون إذنك، فيمكنك اتباع العملية الموضحة هنا https://ar.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - تطبيق بودكاست
انتقل إلى وضع عدم الاتصال باستخدام تطبيق Player FM !
انتقل إلى وضع عدم الاتصال باستخدام تطبيق Player FM !
المدونة الصوتية تستحق الاستماع
برعاية
Y
Young and Profiting with Hala Taha (Entrepreneurship, Sales, Marketing)


1 Dave Ramsey: 5 Stages to Build and Scale a Business That Lasts | Entrepreneurship | E344 1:03:38
1:03:38
التشغيل لاحقا
التشغيل لاحقا
قوائم
إعجاب
احب1:03:38
Too many entrepreneurs get stuck on the business treadmill, hustling nonstop, unable to scale, and unknowingly stalling their growth. That’s where Dave Ramsey began. After crashing into $3 million in debt, he rebuilt from scratch, turning a small radio program into a national show with millions of listeners. With over three decades of experience in entrepreneurship, business growth, and content creation, he knows what it takes to build a lasting business. In this episode, Dave reveals the six drivers of long-term success, the five key stages of startup growth, and how he balances life as an entrepreneur and a content creator. In this episode, Hala and Dave will discuss: (00:00) Introduction (00:23) The Core Principles of Financial Freedom (05:42) Adapting to Change as a Content Creator (09:22) Balancing Content Creation and Entrepreneurship (12:34) How to Create a Clear Path in Business (15:19) The Truth About Starting a Business Today (18:22) The Six Drivers of Business Success (26:20) Shifting From Tactical to Strategic Thinking (29:44) The Five Stages of Business Growth (41:10) Leading with Care, Clarity, and Accountability (47:10) Identifying the Right Leadership Skills (48:35) Starting a Media Business as an Entrepreneur Dave Ramsey is a personal finance expert, radio personality, bestselling author, and the founder and CEO of Ramsey Solutions. Over the past three decades, he has built a legacy of helping millions achieve financial freedom. As the host of The Ramsey Show , Dave reaches more than 18 million listeners each week. He is the author of eight national bestselling books. His latest, Build a Business You Love , helps entrepreneurs navigate growth and overcome challenges at every stage. Sponsored By: Shopify - Sign up for a one-dollar-per-month trial period at youngandprofiting.co/shopify OpenPhone: Streamline and scale your customer communications with OpenPhone. Get 20% off your first 6 months at openphone.com/profiting Airbnb - Find yourself a co-host at airbnb.com/host Indeed - Get a $75 sponsored job credit at indeed.com/profiting RobinHood - Receive your 3% boost on annual IRA contributions, sign up at robinhood.com/gold Factor - Get 50% off your first box plus free shipping at factormeals.com/factorpodcast Rakuten - Save while shopping at rakuten.com Microsoft Teams - Stop paying for tools. Get everything you need, for free at aka.ms/profiting LinkedIn Marketing Solutions - Get a $100 credit on your next campaign at linkedin.com/profiting Resources Mentioned: Dave’s Book, Build a Business You Love: bit.ly/BuildaBusinessYouLove Dave’s Website: ramseysolutions.com Active Deals - youngandprofiting.com/deals Key YAP Links Reviews - ratethispodcast.com/yap Youtube - youtube.com/c/YoungandProfiting LinkedIn - linkedin.com/in/htaha/ Instagram - instagram.com/yapwithhala/ Social + Podcast Services: yapmedia.com Transcripts - youngandprofiting.com/episodes-new Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship Podcast, Business, Business Podcast, Self Improvement, Self-Improvement, Personal Development, Starting a Business, Strategy, Investing, Sales, Selling, Psychology, Productivity, Entrepreneurs, AI, Artificial Intelligence, Technology, Marketing, Negotiation, Money, Finance, Side Hustle, Mental Health, Career, Leadership, Mindset, Health, Growth Mindset, Side Hustle, Passive Income, Online Business, Solopreneur, Networking.…
The Non-Prophets explicit
وسم كل الحلقات كغير/(كـ)مشغلة
Manage series 2487204
المحتوى المقدم من Atheist Community of Austin. يتم تحميل جميع محتويات البودكاست بما في ذلك الحلقات والرسومات وأوصاف البودكاست وتقديمها مباشرة بواسطة Atheist Community of Austin أو شريك منصة البودكاست الخاص بهم. إذا كنت تعتقد أن شخصًا ما يستخدم عملك المحمي بحقوق الطبع والنشر دون إذنك، فيمكنك اتباع العملية الموضحة هنا https://ar.player.fm/legal.
And we are The Non-Prophets!... airing on the first and third Sunday of every month, starting at 3:00 PM Central (01:30-03:00 UTC) on our Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/thenonprophetsaca. The Non-Prophets focuses on atheism and the separation of church and state.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
…
continue reading
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
824 حلقات
وسم كل الحلقات كغير/(كـ)مشغلة
Manage series 2487204
المحتوى المقدم من Atheist Community of Austin. يتم تحميل جميع محتويات البودكاست بما في ذلك الحلقات والرسومات وأوصاف البودكاست وتقديمها مباشرة بواسطة Atheist Community of Austin أو شريك منصة البودكاست الخاص بهم. إذا كنت تعتقد أن شخصًا ما يستخدم عملك المحمي بحقوق الطبع والنشر دون إذنك، فيمكنك اتباع العملية الموضحة هنا https://ar.player.fm/legal.
And we are The Non-Prophets!... airing on the first and third Sunday of every month, starting at 3:00 PM Central (01:30-03:00 UTC) on our Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/thenonprophetsaca. The Non-Prophets focuses on atheism and the separation of church and state.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
…
continue reading
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
824 حلقات
كل الحلقات
×T
The Non-Prophets

1 From Faith to Parody: Holy Spirit Ouija Board 16:01
16:01
التشغيل لاحقا
التشغيل لاحقا
قوائم
إعجاب
احب16:01
The "Holy Spirit Board" is Ouija for Jesus, Boing Boing.net, By Thom Dunn, December 20, 2022 http://bit.ly/3WjYpp3 This segment delves into the comical yet intriguing notion of a “Holy Spirit Ouija Board,” a product that has sparked both amusement and controversy. The board, which appears to be a regular Ouija board with a religious twist, has drawn attention for its bizarre nature. As the group explores the idea of using a Ouija board to communicate with the divine, they raise questions about whether this is a genuine spiritual tool or just another form of entertainment. At the center of the conversation is the concept of faith and the role of skepticism. While some members of the group approach the board as a joke, others suggest that it could be genuinely meaningful to those who believe in it. The discussion veers into the realm of parody, with one panelist suggesting that the board might be a clever marketing strategy designed to profit from the absurdity of the idea. However, the idea that people could take something like this seriously raises a more profound question about the nature of belief and the lengths to which individuals will go to find spiritual experiences. The conversation also touches on the power of internet reviews and viral content, with mentions of the Holy Spirit Ouija Board gaining traction due to online reactions. As the conversation progresses, the panelists also reflect on the wider implications of spiritual commercialization. They question whether products like the Holy Spirit Ouija Board are simply products of our capitalist society, exploiting people’s beliefs for profit, or if they are part of a deeper trend of commodified spirituality. They ponder whether products like these might contribute to the blurring of the line between genuine belief and entertainment. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the complex nature of belief, humor, and consumerism. While some view the Holy Spirit Ouija Board as a harmless joke, others see it as a reflection of the commercialization of spirituality, questioning the impact of such products on how we engage with religion. The debate raises important questions about the authenticity of spiritual experiences in an age where everything, from the sacred to the profane, is marketed for profit. The Non-Prophets, Episode 24.13.1 featuring Phoebe Rose, Jason Sherwood, August and Mateo Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support .…
T
The Non-Prophets

1 Inclusivity: Because Who Needs It Anyway? 15:16
15:16
التشغيل لاحقا
التشغيل لاحقا
قوائم
إعجاب
احب15:16
Updated A West Ada teacher was asked to remove signs promoting inclusivity. Controversy ensued. Idaho Education News, By Idahoednews, on March 13, 2025 https://www.idahoednews.org/top-news/a-west-ada-teacher-was-asked-to-remove-signs-promoting-inclusivity-controversy-ensued/ In Idaho, a teacher’s classroom posters promoting inclusivity sparked significant controversy when they were asked to be removed by the West Ada School District. The posters, which carried messages of acceptance, diversity, and unity, were deemed incompatible with district policies, leading to pushback from both the community and advocacy groups. Supporters of the teacher argued that the signs created a positive and welcoming environment, fostering a sense of safety for students, while critics believed they could be seen as political statements. The controversy highlights the ongoing debate about freedom of expression in schools, teacher rights, and the balance between inclusivity and maintaining a neutral educational space. The district's policies, which support the display of the American flag and other content-neutral materials, seem to clash with the teacher's efforts to promote inclusivity, creating confusion about what is considered acceptable in the classroom. The teacher’s decision to stand by her message, despite opposition, has drawn support from students and local organizations, demonstrating the power of community activism in the face of restrictive policies. As national attention grows, the incident underscores the larger conversation about how public schools handle issues of diversity and inclusivity. The Non-Prophets, Episode 24.12.4 featuring Jimmy Jr., AJ, and Infidel64. Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support .…
T
The Non-Prophets

1 DOGE: Cut Aid, Keep Billionaire Welfare 19:42
19:42
التشغيل لاحقا
التشغيل لاحقا
قوائم
إعجاب
احب19:42
Johns Hopkins laying off more than 2,000 workers after dramatic cut in USAID funding CNN, By Kaanita Iyer, on March 13, 2025 https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/13/politics/johns-hopkins-layoffs-usaid-funding/index.html This discussion delves into the financial cuts at John Hopkins University, following the U.S. administration’s decision to slash $800 million in funding from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). These cuts are set to impact not only thousands of jobs across 44 countries but also critical global health programs, such as maternal health and disease prevention. The cuts threaten projects combating HIV, malaria, and tuberculosis, which disproportionately affect international populations. These layoffs come as part of a broader pattern of attacks on education systems, particularly scientific research, which have been targeted by conservative political agendas. This assault on international health programs is portrayed as hypocritical, especially considering the administration's “pro-family” stance, which contradicts the harm caused to mothers and children worldwide by these cuts. The conversation highlights how such actions harm both global goodwill and U.S. interests, pointing out that scientific research and international health aid serve U.S. self-interest by helping to combat global health crises like pandemics. Additionally, the conversation touches on the broader impacts of these financial decisions on higher education, which is facing cuts and political interference, such as the targeting of universities like Columbia for allowing protests, which further exemplifies the administration’s efforts to control speech and suppress certain viewpoints. The broader theme is one of harmful political agendas being prioritized over human well-being and education, and how these actions have both immediate and long-term negative consequences on vulnerable populations. The Non-Prophets, Episode 24.12.2 featuring Jimmy Jr., AJ, and Infidel64. Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support .…
T
The Non-Prophets

1 SCOTUS: Is LGBTQ Suffering a Religious Right? 18:43
18:43
التشغيل لاحقا
التشغيل لاحقا
قوائم
إعجاب
احب18:43
Supreme Court will hear challenge to Colorado conversion therapy ban Axios, By Avery Lotz, on Mar 10, 2025 https://www.axios.com/2025/03/10/supreme-court-conversion-therapy-challenge In Colorado, a legal challenge is underway against a state ban on gender conversion therapy for minors. The case centers on Christian counselor Kaylee Charles, who argues that the state's prohibition of conversion therapy infringes on her free speech rights. The law, House Bill 19-1129, which came into effect in 2019, was designed to protect minors from potentially harmful practices that aim to change an individual’s sexual orientation or gender identity. The case raises the question of whether this ban is a form of forced religious indoctrination or a necessary measure to protect vulnerable children. AJ and Infidel 64 discussed the issue, with AJ expressing the view that conversion therapy is not about free speech, as counselors are free to discuss various topics but should not force clients to conform to specific beliefs. Infidel emphasized the harm caused by conversion therapy, likening it to other forms of medical malpractice. Both agreed that such therapy is rooted in religious ideologies, and it’s crucial to consider the potential harm to children, particularly when families pressure minors into undergoing conversion therapy. AJ highlighted that conversion therapy is banned in some states but remains legal in others, underscoring the need for broader protections. Infidel and AJ both pointed out that conversion therapy is primarily associated with religious organizations and driven by conservative ideologies that often reject the validity of LGBTQ+ identities. Infidel further criticized the conservative majority on the U.S. Supreme Court, expressing concern that their stance on issues like same-sex marriage and LGBTQ+ rights could jeopardize the progress made in protecting these communities. Infidel concluded by emphasizing the scientific consensus against conversion therapy, which has been shown to harm LGBTQ+ youth and increase mental health risks, including suicide. Both agreed that conversion therapy should be banned and that the focus should be on supporting LGBTQ+ individuals' identities to promote their well-being. The Non-Prophets, Episode 24.12.1 featuring Jimmy Jr., AJ, and Infidel64. Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support .…
T
The Non-Prophets

https://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.htmlhttps://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.html The Wild Hunt, By Manny Moreno And Mannytejeda, on March 4, 2025 https://wildhunt.org/2025/03/wv-seeks-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-bible-as-the-utmost-authority-for-human-moral-behavior.html The discussion revolves around a resolution introduced by Christian nationalist lawmakers in West Virginia that seeks to officially recognize the Bible as a historically accurate record of human history and the ultimate moral authority. The resolution also calls for the Bible to be prominently displayed in public buildings, including schools, and given a place of reverence in state laws and policies. A similar bill advancing the kingship of Jesus Christ is also being pushed in North Dakota. While such resolutions are clearly unconstitutional, there is concern that they could gain traction if they are passed onto the ballot for public vote in 2026. However, GOP leadership in West Virginia appears to be shuffling the bill around in committees, possibly to avoid its progression, knowing that such measures could be legally challenged and politically damaging. Kelley points out that this type of legislation is a tactic often used by the GOP to distract voters from their failure to address real societal issues such as poverty, crime, and inflation. By passing Christian nationalist laws, they secure continued support from their base, even if they fail to deliver on actual governance. He sees this as a strategy to maintain power without real solutions. The group debates whether this push is an argument from fallacy or simply an appeal to the majority’s religious sentiment. Tracy, raised in a casual Catholic environment, asserts that the claim of the Bible being 100% accurate is absurd. She highlights the contradictions and inaccuracies within the text, noting that if a statement does not align with reality, it cannot be considered true. Furthermore, she argues that declaring Jesus as the king of America undermines the country’s foundation, effectively nullifying the nation’s principles. Elevating the Bible as the supreme moral authority is in direct violation of the First Amendment, and any attempts to implement such policies signal a desire to dismantle the secular nature of the government. Eli acknowledges that some aspects of the Bible contain positive moral guidance, such as "love thy neighbor," but this does not mean the entire book is a reliable or ethical foundation for lawmaking. He challenges the idea that morality should be derived from a single religious text, arguing that moral decision-making is subjective and dependent on individual circumstances. By attempting to impose the Bible as a universal moral code, lawmakers are not only violating constitutional principles but also ignoring the demonstrable moral failings of the text itself. The panel also discusses the implications of trying to legislate religious doctrine, questioning whether this would lead to enforcing biblical punishments such as stoning for working on Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support .…
T
The Non-Prophets

AntiTrans Bill in Iowa Gets Final OK , Despite Protests TIME, By Hannah Fingerhut Ap, on February 27, 2025 https://time.com/7262485/protesters-iowa-capitol-gender-identity/ In this episode, the panel delves into the controversial legislative actions in Iowa, where lawmakers swiftly passed discriminatory laws against transgender individuals. Tracy begins by highlighting how politicians exploit children's vulnerability in political rhetoric, illustrating Iowa Representative Step Holt's swift enactment of a bill removing gender identity from protected classes against discrimination. Signed into law by Governor Reynolds, this bill, effective July 1, sparked immediate backlash and protests. Tracy and Kelley discuss the absurd speed at which such discriminatory legislation can pass, contrasting it with the sluggish pace of justice. They criticize the pretext of bathroom safety and sports equity used to justify the bill, arguing it masks underlying misogyny and misplaced fears of cisgender men posing as transgender women for nefarious purposes. They highlight the hypocrisy and lack of scientific basis in these arguments, particularly in the context of transgender participation in sports, which has been managed internationally without issue for decades. The panel acknowledges the limited effectiveness of existing civil rights laws in preventing such bills from passing swiftly. They express hope for legal challenges despite the conservative tilt of the federal judiciary in recent years. Eli adds that these bills reflect a dangerous trend of legislating from a narrow worldview that excludes and harms marginalized groups, using legal means to enforce societal conformity rather than protect individual rights. In discussing the political dynamics, they speculate on the motives behind such legislation, suggesting it panders to a voter base with little regard for the actual impact on transgender individuals. They criticize politicians who adopt stances contrary to their personal beliefs for electoral gain, contributing to the polarization and division within society. The panel praises the few dissenting voices within the GOP but laments their ineffectiveness in preventing the bill's passage. They warn of the long-term consequences of such divisive legislation, predicting further social fragmentation and erosion of civil rights. Tracy emphasizes the importance of unity and justice in legislation, envisioning a society where laws benefit everyone, not just the majority. In conclusion, they call on viewers to consider the broader implications of such legislation and advocate for human rights, urging collective action against discriminatory practices. They encourage engagement with advocacy organizations and support for legal challenges to ensure equal protection under the law for all individuals. The Non-Prophets, Episode 24.11.3 featuring Helen Greene, Eli Slack, Kelley Laughlin and Tracy Wilbert Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support .…
T
The Non-Prophets

1 No Need for Vaccines. God will Cure Us! 21:36
21:36
التشغيل لاحقا
التشغيل لاحقا
قوائم
إعجاب
احب21:36
West Texans , Mennonites at center of measles outbreak choose medical freedom over vaccine mandates AP News, By Devi Shastri, on March 4, 2025 https://apnews.com/article/measles-outbreak-texas-rfk-vaccines-8cf4641b04731c713edb524ca943490c The discussion opens with the old saying, "God helps those who help themselves," but the Mennonite community in rural Texas appears to have missed that memo. Under RFK Jr.'s leadership in the Department of Health, the United States is seeing a rise in measles and other supposedly eradicated diseases. This resurgence is largely due to a rejection of medical science based on faith, a lack of trust in institutions, and inadequate public health education in isolated communities. The consequences of anti-vaccine ideology are dire, particularly in areas with limited health outreach. Faith-based decision-making is leading to preventable deaths, all because of a refusal to vaccinate. The conversation shifts to the tension between parental rights and public health. Many argue that parents should have the right to raise their children as they see fit, but when parental decisions cause harm to others, there’s a problem. The issue arises in part from many adults ceasing to learn after leaving school, making them susceptible to misinformation. People focus on the small risks of vaccines without comparing them to the far greater risks of preventable diseases. It's like claiming water is deadly because it appears in autopsy results—misinterpreting basic facts without context leads to unnecessary fear and poor decisions. The hosts discuss RFK Jr.’s credibility—or lack thereof—regarding vaccines. Despite his skepticism, Kennedy has no medical background. His experience is in environmental law, not medicine or immunology, and his history includes youthful delinquency, drug use, and a complete lack of medical education. While his efforts in fighting corporate pollution are commendable, they do not qualify him to make medical determinations. The irony is clear: a pastor dismisses rigorously tested vaccines but trusts an unqualified figurehead without expertise in medicine. The conversation also addresses whether a lack of education can justify health negligence, particularly in isolated religious communities such as the Mennonites and Amish. One host argues that even uneducated parents should be able to recognize rising child mortality rates and take steps to address them. The problem is not total ignorance but being misinformed. Many parents reject vaccines because they fear their children will develop autism, despite no scientific evidence linking the two. This misinformation is pervasive and convincing, even for those who otherwise trust science. A personal story from the early 2000s highlights the straightforward decision to vaccinate when the chickenpox vaccine became available. In contrast, the modern age of the internet has made it harder for parents to distinguish fact from fiction. One speaker shares that their time in EMT school helped develop critical thinking skills and a trust in medical expertise. Trusting a pediatrician, someone with years of education, should be the default, but many parents instead turn to dubious online sources, trusting "Kevin from Facebook" over trained doctors. The conversation also explores the generational gap in vaccine awareness. Older generations remember the devastating effects of diseases like measles, polio, and chickenpox, while younger parents have never witnessed these outcomes. As a result, they underestimate the importance of vaccines, treating them as optional rather than essential. Adding to this problem is a rise in religious rhetoric framing vaccines as a challenge to faith, convincing people that true followers of Jesus wouldn’t accept foreign substances in their bodies. This mix of ignorance, selfishness, and misinformation creates a dangerous situation. The discussion closes by revisiting the Mennonite community’s position between isolation and engagement with modern society. Unlike the Amish, who are entirely separate from secular culture, Mennonites interact with the outside world but resist certain aspects of it. This raises the question: how much information are they really receiving, and can they verify its accuracy? It seems clear that, like many others, they cannot. The challenge is to bridge this knowledge gap before more preventable deaths occur. The Non-Prophets, Episode 24.11.2 featuring Helen Greene, Eli Slack, Kelley Laughlin and Tracy Wilbert Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support .…
T
The Non-Prophets

Oklahoma GOP advances bill letting Christian doctors deny services to patients The Friendly Atheist, By Hemant Mehta, on March 5, 2025 https://www.friendlyatheist.com/p/oklahoma-gop-advances-bill-letting The ongoing discussion centers around House Bill 1006 in Oklahoma, which would allow medical professionals to refuse care based on personal ethical, moral, or religious beliefs. This controversial bill is perceived as a direct attack on individual autonomy, placing people's well-being at risk in favor of religious freedom. The debate escalates into questions about the ethics of healthcare, especially regarding religious objections to certain treatments like abortion or gender-affirming care. Panelists discuss the implications of such a bill, with Tracy arguing that this stems from entitlement and a refusal to empathize with those in need of care. The conversation expands to the broader issue of personal beliefs interfering with professional duties. One panelist points out that if religious beliefs are allowed to dictate medical practice, it opens the door for prejudices based on race, gender, or sexual orientation, which could further harm marginalized groups. There's also the concern that emergency care could be undermined if doctors interpret situations in ways that align with their personal beliefs. The Hippocratic Oath, which doctors take to promise "do no harm," is brought into question. The law's potential to undermine this oath is a serious concern, as medical professionals could choose to withhold care based on subjective ethical reasoning. While some argue that religious freedoms should allow for such refusals, others see this as a dangerous precedent. Emergency situations might provide an exception, but the vagueness of what constitutes an emergency leads to further potential abuse. Ultimately, the bill would create a system where healthcare is treated as a privilege rather than a right, accessible only to those whose values align with those of their doctors. The Non-Prophets, Episode 24.11.1 featuring Helen Greene, Eli Slack, Kelley Laughlin and Tracy Wilbert Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support .…
T
The Non-Prophets

1 A Physicist Rejects the Idea that we Live In a Sim Universe 13:48
13:48
التشغيل لاحقا
التشغيل لاحقا
قوائم
إعجاب
احب13:48
Mind Matters News, January 8, 2023 http://bit.ly/3kwt70G The discussion explores physicist Marcelo Gleiser's argument against the possibility of reality being a simulation. The panelists express skepticism, noting that such claims often rely on unfalsifiable assertions rather than scientific evidence. They critique the logic behind simulation theory, pointing out its similarities to religious arguments—particularly the claim that "we can't prove we're not in a simulation," which mirrors arguments for the existence of God. Teo dismisses the theory as an infinite regress problem, arguing that if a simulation exists, it would require a simulator, which would also need a creator, leading to an endless cycle of simulated realities. August finds the idea intriguing but remains unconvinced without tangible evidence, likening it to the Fermi Paradox, where people speculate about extraterrestrial life without direct proof. Phoebe criticizes proponents of the theory for their lack of critical thinking, comparing it to conspiracy theories like lizard people running governments. The conversation shifts to implications of simulation theory on concepts like free will. August highlights how the idea could challenge autonomy, likening it to debates over determinism. Teo humorously introduces "theocentric theory," proposing that the universe revolves around himself, poking fun at the egocentric nature of some philosophical arguments. Jason performs an experiment by telling everyone to raise their arms, joking that their compliance proves his control over them. Ultimately, the panelists find simulation theory entertaining but unconvincing. They agree that without evidence, it remains speculative fiction rather than a scientific hypothesis. The Non-Prophets, Episode 24.10.4 Phoebe Rose, Jason Sherwood, August and Mateo Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support .…
T
The Non-Prophets

The Times of Israel, By Gabriel Lamza, March 9, 2023, https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/what-is-pure-and-authentic-faith/ Faith is often presented as a virtue, a connection to the divine, or a means of understanding the world. However, in attempting to defend this notion, many religious arguments reveal their own contradictions. One such example is an article that claims the biblical phrase "made in God's image" refers to humanity’s ability to think independently. Yet, this directly contradicts the biblical narrative, which states that Adam and Eve lacked moral awareness until they ate from the Tree of Knowledge, thereby gaining the ability to discern good from evil. If humans were truly created with independent thought, then why was acquiring knowledge seen as an act of defiance? This contradiction exposes the apologetic gymnastics often required to reconcile faith with reason. The article further asserts that faith requires the complete submission of one’s reasoning to divine authority, essentially equating godliness with obedience rather than critical thinking. This idea undermines the initial claim that thinking is what connects humans to God. By its own logic, faith is not a tool of intellectual independence but rather a mechanism for suppressing thought. This is precisely why faith can be dangerous—when belief supersedes evidence, there is no limit to what one might justify in the name of faith. While many use faith for good, history is filled with examples of atrocities committed under divine justification. Adding to the confusion, the article includes a bizarre analogy involving a train and tiny horses, meant to illustrate how humans often misinterpret the unknown. Instead of accepting ignorance as an opportunity for further exploration, the author suggests that one should simply assume an unseen force—God—is at work. This highlights a common problem in religious thinking: the insistence that unanswered questions must default to divine intervention rather than admitting uncertainty. However, just as educating people on how engines work eliminates the need for "tiny horses," education and critical thinking remove the necessity of religious explanations for the unknown. Finally, the article claims that faith is a rational conclusion and that even the most logical individuals will ultimately arrive at it. However, this ignores the fact that many people leave religion precisely because of rational inquiry. The more one scrutinizes faith-based claims with logic and evidence, the more their foundations crumble. The argument that a professor cannot explain their 50 years of knowledge to a child is used to justify the supposed incomprehensibility of God, but this reasoning is flawed. The Non-Prophets, Episode 24.10.3Kelley Laughlin, Lewis, Mateo, and Aaron Jensen Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support .…
T
The Non-Prophets

1 How Religious Mythology Shapes Sexual Norms 14:55
14:55
التشغيل لاحقا
التشغيل لاحقا
قوائم
إعجاب
احب14:55
Strange But True: Ancient Egyptians were so into oral sex, they put it in their religion — and religious art, Salon, Matthew Rosza, January 29, 2023 Sex and morality have been tightly controlled by religion throughout history, shaping societal attitudes toward sexuality. The discussion begins with ancient Egypt, where gods were depicted engaging in acts like autofellatio as part of creation myths. While some assume ancient societies were more sexually open, the reality is that Egypt had conservative sexual norms comparable to their neighbors in Israel. The control of sex, particularly by religious institutions, has historically been a tool of power, reinforcing shame and guilt around natural human behavior. Victorian England is often blamed for sexual repression, but it’s argued that this is more a product of later interpretations than the reality of Victorian life. The Victorians were far from prudish in private, as demonstrated by explicit personal writings, including Queen Victoria’s enthusiastic comments about Prince Albert. More broadly, history shows fluctuating attitudes toward sex, from the uninhibited Greeks and Romans to later societies that sought to regulate and repress it. Religion, particularly Christianity, often attempts to define acceptable sexual behavior, controlling it in ways that reinforce their broader authority. A notable aspect of ancient Egyptian sexuality is their exclusion of homosexuality from their records, raising questions about whether labeling and recognizing sexual identities make societies more tolerant or simply more aware of division. Regardless of historical shifts, the pattern remains: sex is a fundamental human drive, and societies continuously shape and reshape its role based on cultural and religious influences. Ultimately, the gods people create reflect their own desires and societal norms, further proving that human behavior, rather than divine decree, dictates morality. The Non-Prophets, Episode 24.10.2 featuring Jason Sherwood, Aaron Jensen, Richard Firth-Godbehere and Scott Dickie. Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support .…
T
The Non-Prophets

1 Why the moral panic over "grooming" is so effective at manipulating the right-wing mind 13:47
13:47
التشغيل لاحقا
التشغيل لاحقا
قوائم
إعجاب
احب13:47
Salon, Matthew Rosza, January 30, 2023 http://bit.ly/3xcJxyH This segment discusses the moral panic surrounding the term "grooming," particularly in relation to LGBTQ+ people, and how it is being weaponized by right-wing politicians, particularly in Florida under Ron DeSantis. Historically, moral panics have been used to demonize specific groups—examples include the witch hunts and the Nazis' rise to power. The latest iteration of this tactic is the banning of books and restricting discussions around LGBTQ+ topics in schools under the pretense of "protecting children." The panel critiques the effectiveness of this fear-based messaging, pointing out that invoking child safety is an emotional trigger that stirs public outrage, even when there's no factual basis. The term "grooming" is being misused to conflate LGBTQ+ identities with pedophilia, despite no evidence supporting such a connection. Instead of addressing actual risk factors for child abuse—such as poverty, lack of education, and inadequate mental health services—conservatives are using the "grooming" narrative as a political weapon. They also highlight the hypocrisy of these fearmongers, who ignore well-documented abuses within religious institutions like the Catholic Church. The discussion expands to how right-wing leaders, including DeSantis, use these tactics to rally their base by creating an "us vs. them" mentality, turning marginalized communities into scapegoats. The panel draws parallels to past laws in the UK, like Section 28, which banned "promoting" homosexuality, a vague and harmful policy that took over a decade to repeal. Ultimately, the panel argues that real child protection efforts should focus on economic stability, education, and community support rather than scapegoating LGBTQ+ people or banning books. The fear-mongering around grooming isn't about protecting kids—it’s about controlling the narrative and demonizing marginalized communities for political gain. The Non-Prophets, Episode 24.10.1 featuring Jason Sherwood, Aaron Jensen, Richard Firth-Godbehere and Scott Dickie. Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support .…
T
The Non-Prophets

1 Scientists Rethink Everything as Predictability Fades 21:07
21:07
التشغيل لاحقا
التشغيل لاحقا
قوائم
إعجاب
احب21:07
Scientists sound alarm over troubling phenomena forcing them to 'rethink' everything 'Predictability has become more challenging' The Cool Down, By Chelsea Cook, on February 14, 2025 https://www.thecooldown.com/green-tech/unpredictable-climate-patterns-shift/ In the face of increasingly unpredictable weather patterns and rising climate change risks, scientists are sounding the alarm over how outdated models are failing to provide accurate forecasts for extreme weather events. Researchers are struggling to adjust their climate models in the face of shifting ocean currents, unprecedented flooding, and the overall volatility of weather. These challenges are making it difficult to prepare for natural disasters that are disproportionately affecting vulnerable communities. Despite the urgency for enhanced research and preparedness, political pressures and budget cuts are undermining the very institutions needed to address these growing climate risks. Powerful corporations have consistently ignored or downplayed the significance of climate change, focusing on short-term profits rather than long-term solutions. This has led to a precarious situation where climate uncertainty looms large, and scientific institutions, underfunded and under attack, are struggling to guide us toward meaningful solutions. As one speaker highlights, "The chickens are coming home to roost," echoing a sentiment that the consequences of our current inaction will soon become unavoidable. As these extreme weather events become more frequent and severe, it’s essential for policymakers to prioritize research and funding to better understand and mitigate the effects of climate change. However, this is increasingly difficult in a political climate where corporate interests are driving decisions, and scientific efforts are being hindered. In response to this urgent situation, there is a call for increased public involvement, from supporting climate-friendly policies to reducing individual carbon footprints through lifestyle changes. Yet, as discussed, the real key lies in corporate responsibility and the government's role in funding and protecting climate research. Until these larger systemic changes occur, the battle against climate change will remain a monumental challenge. The Non-Prophets, Episode 24.9.4 featuring Cynthia McDonald, Infidel64, Aaron Jensen and AJ Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support .…
T
The Non-Prophets

Yes, there is a lawsuit that could eliminate Section 504 khou.com, By Texas And Several Other States Could End It, on February 15, 2025 https://www.khou.com/article/news/verify/section-504-lawsuit/285-643af794-fb84-4b84-a3fd-d8060ec5db71 The Texas Attorney General, Ken Paxton, filed a lawsuit challenging the inclusion of gender dysphoria under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which protects individuals with disabilities from discrimination in federally funded institutions. The lawsuit aims to remove gender identity protections, particularly under the Biden administration's recent changes, arguing that Section 504 itself is unconstitutional. The outcome could affect many individuals across Texas and beyond, impacting access to essential services like education, healthcare, and public accommodations, which rely on these nondiscrimination protections. If Section 504 were struck down, it could remove protections for individuals with various disabilities, not just those affected by gender dysphoria. These protections ensure equal access to services, such as wheelchair ramps, classroom accommodations, medical device use, and more. Beyond the LGBTQ+ community, many people with disabilities, such as diabetes, autism, or visual impairments, rely on these rights for their day-to-day lives. The potential loss of these protections could harm vulnerable populations, particularly in public institutions, like schools, hospitals, and other government-funded services. The broader implication is that removing these protections could set a dangerous precedent for dismantling anti-discrimination laws, affecting millions who benefit from them. The legal and political trends surrounding this lawsuit reflect a growing shift in how disability rights and LGBTQ+ protections are framed. Those opposing gender identity protections often view them as part of a broader "woke" agenda, but the consequences of dismantling these protections could affect many individuals across various communities. With a polarized political climate, where personal interests and ideological lines blur, there's a significant risk that broader legal protections could be weakened, jeopardizing the rights of marginalized groups. The lawsuit is further complicated by the current political and judicial environment, where a more conservative Supreme Court has been inclined to reverse precedents and interpret laws based on tradition rather than established legal frameworks. If this lawsuit succeeds, it could lead to the elimination of vital protections, not just for transgender individuals, but for many others who rely on Section 504 for equality and access to necessary services. The Non-Prophets, Episode 24.9.3 featuring Cynthia McDonald, Infidel64, Aaron Jensen and AJ Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support .…
T
The Non-Prophets

1 Utah Law Allows Nazi, Confederate Flags in Schools—But Not Pride Flag 21:00
21:00
التشغيل لاحقا
التشغيل لاحقا
قوائم
إعجاب
احب21:00
New Utah law would allow for Nazi and Confederate flags to be shown in schools but not Pride flag NewsBreak NewsBreak, By The Independent, on February 14, 2025 https://www.newsbreak.com/share/3812118394569-new-utah-law-would-allow-for-nazi-and-confederate-flags-to-be-shown-in-schools-but-not-pride-flag This proposed bill in Utah, which bans the display of Pride Flags while allowing the display of Nazi and Confederate flags under certain educational circumstances, has ignited strong criticism. Lawmakers argue that banning Pride Flags maintains a neutral space, while allowing the historical display of Nazi and Confederate flags could aid in teaching about World War II and the Civil War. Many, particularly from the LGBTQ+ community, have condemned the proposal as discriminatory and harmful. The situation highlights the ongoing struggles surrounding LGBTQ+ rights, as some people push back against displaying any symbols that represent marginalized identities. The bill's controversial nature extends beyond flags, revealing deeper concerns about ideology control and the suppression of certain groups. Critics point out that such policies perpetuate a dangerous narrative that harms the LGBTQ+ community, especially those already facing high rates of discrimination and suicide. The discussion then shifts to broader concerns about the government's role in controlling public symbols and speech, with some arguing that the true agenda is to reinforce conformity and suppress those whose existence challenges entrenched worldviews. The impact on LGBTQ+ students, particularly those from transgender communities, is seen as potentially devastating. With suicide rates higher among these groups due to discrimination, critics argue that such bills could exacerbate an already harmful environment. Moreover, the narrative around biological sex versus gender identity is being distorted in public policies, as seen in recent executive orders attempting to define gender in simplistic, scientifically inaccurate terms. In response, community members are encouraged to actively resist such policies, engage in public discourse, and stand against the normalization of oppressive ideologies. By demanding that LGBTQ+ history, such as the Stonewall riots, be included in education, they hope to challenge the selective suppression of identities while holding space for the celebration of all cultures, including those historically marginalized. The Non-Prophets, Episode 24.9.2 featuring Cynthia McDonald, Infidel64, Aaron Jensen and AJ Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support .…
T
The Non-Prophets

1 Police Arrest Leader of 'Zizian' Cult Linked to U.S. Killings 19:47
19:47
التشغيل لاحقا
التشغيل لاحقا
قوائم
إعجاب
احب19:47
Police arrest apparent leader of cult like 'Zizian' group linked to multiple killings in the US AP News, By Michael Casey And Mcasey, on February 17, 2025 https://apnews.com/article/zizians-killings-border-patrol-bf599db6b9ec354c68ed5ff4d5701b84 Police Arrest Leader of 'Zizian' Cult Linked to U.S. Killings Police arrest apparent leader of cult like 'Zizian' group linked to multiple killings in the US AP News, By Michael Casey And Mcasey, on February 17, 2025 https://apnews.com/article/zizians-killings-border-patrol-bf599db6b9ec354c68ed5ff4d5701b84 This story outlines the troubling rise of the Zizans, a group that originally emerged from a more intellectual online community, before devolving into violent actions. In 2016, a figure named Jack Lasoda, writing under the pen name "Ziz," began publishing a blog combining radical ideas such as rationalism, anarchism, ethical veganism, and others, which led to the formation of a group known as the Zizans. Over time, they became more extreme, culminating in a series of violent incidents including the blocking of exits at an event and the brutal attacks that followed, one of which involved a landlord being severely injured and another resulting in a murder. The story takes a particularly chilling turn in 2022, when Ziz faked her own death, which was publicly reported, only to reemerge later. The group's violent spree continued into 2023, with members involved in a murder and a deadly police confrontation. Despite arrests in 2025, doubts persist about whether the group has truly been dismantled, or if they are merely regrouping for future actions. As this unfolds, the discussion turns to the radicalizing effects of online spaces, with commentators questioning the responsibility of social media platforms in preventing such transformations. One speaker suggests that while private messages and personal privacy must be protected, platforms still bear some responsibility to curb violent rhetoric. This leads into a broader examination of how individuals, even those who seem far removed from radicalization, can fall victim to it through selective media consumption and echo chambers. The conversation expands further into the dynamics of fringe movements, especially those combining anarchism, transhumanism, and radical identity politics, with reflections on how such movements form and what makes them turn dangerous. The discussion emphasizes that any movement, regardless of its ideological leanings, can become a breeding ground for extremism if it creates an "us versus them" mentality. Finally, the issue of transparency in law enforcement and the role of skepticism is raised, underscoring the need for constant self-reflection and critical thinking in preventing the spread of dangerous ideologies. It is suggested that, in addition to skepticism, society needs more rebels willing to challenge authority to avoid the kind of radicalization that leads to violence and societal harm. The Non-Prophets, Episode 24.9.1 featuring Cynthia McDonald, Infidel64, Aaron Jensen and AJ Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support .…
T
The Non-Prophets

Church bans non-alcoholic wine and gluten-free bread from holy communion - NewsBreak NewsBreak, By George Lithgow, on February 9, 2025 https://www.newsbreak.com/share/3798407634101-church-bans-non-alcoholic-wine-and-gluten-free-bread-from-holy-communion The Church of England has reaffirmed a long-standing doctrinal stance that only wheat-based bread and fermented grape juice—meaning traditional wine—are valid for Holy Communion. This ruling explicitly excludes non-alcoholic wine and gluten-free bread, creating accessibility issues for those with celiac disease, gluten intolerance, or individuals who abstain from alcohol for health, religious, or personal reasons. While the church recognizes the challenges this presents, it maintains that the theological integrity of the sacrament requires adherence to these specific elements.This decision is grounded in traditional Christian theology, which emphasizes the symbolic nature of the Eucharist. According to the Church of England, the bread used must be wheat-based, as it represents the body of Christ, just as it was at the Last Supper. Similarly, fermented grape wine is considered essential, as it aligns with biblical accounts of Christ's words and actions. Deviating from these elements, the church argues, could compromise the sacrament’s sacred nature.For individuals with gluten intolerance or celiac disease, this presents a significant barrier to fully participating in the central rite of Christian worship. While some branches of Christianity have made accommodations by offering low-gluten alternatives, the Church of England holds firm on the necessity of wheat content in the bread. The ruling suggests that those unable to consume gluten should receive only the wine, a partial participation that some may find exclusionary.The refusal to allow non-alcoholic wine similarly impacts those who abstain from alcohol for health or personal reasons. Many Christian denominations, particularly in the Protestant tradition, have adopted grape juice as an alternative to accommodate recovering alcoholics and others who avoid alcohol.Critics argue that this ruling reflects an outdated rigidity that prioritizes dogma over inclusivity. They contend that maintaining the spirit of the Eucharist—sharing in the body and blood of Christ—should take precedence over strict adherence to specific physical ingredients.This decision highlights the broader tension within religious institutions between tradition and modern accommodation. The Church of England has struggled in recent years with issues of inclusivity, and this ruling adds another layer of debate over how to balance doctrine with accessibility. While some parishioners may see this as a reaffirmation of sacred tradition, others may view it as an unnecessary obstacle that alienates members of the faith. The Non-Prophets, Episode 24.7.4 featuring Scott Dickie, Stephen Harder, Helen Greene and The Ejector Seat Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support .…
T
The Non-Prophets

1 Bible Reading in Public Schools Sparks Controversy 25:25
25:25
التشغيل لاحقا
التشغيل لاحقا
قوائم
إعجاب
احب25:25
Bill introduced to require Bible reading in all public schools, sparking constitutional questions - NewsBreak NewsBreak, By LAURA GUIDO, on February 7, 2025 https://www.newsbreak.com/share/3794686379971-bill-introduced-to-require-bible-reading-in-all-public-schools-sparking-constitutional-questions Idaho lawmakers are considering a bill that would require daily Bible readings in public schools, specifically from the King James Version (KJV) or New King James Version (NKJV). Introduced by Representative Jordan Redman and backed by the Idaho Family Policy Center, the legislation mandates that an occupied classroom in every school district read the Bible sequentially each morning, completing the entire book over ten years. The bill’s proponents argue that this has historical merit, as Bible readings were common in public schools before the 1960s. However, opponents point out that such a law would be a clear violation of the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause, which prohibits government endorsement of religion. Critics argue that this initiative is not just unconstitutional but also fundamentally ineffective in fostering faith, as passive, mandatory exposure to scripture without discussion or interpretation is unlikely to inspire genuine belief. The comparison is made to literature classes—no teacher would require students to read To Kill a Mockingbird without analysis or engagement. The plan, which dictates a rigid reading schedule, would subject students to some of the Bible’s more controversial and inappropriate content, such as violent passages or sexually explicit themes, raising concerns about age appropriateness and teacher preparedness. Some skeptics suggest that the plan could backfire, as forcing students to sit through lengthy, archaic passages from the KJV—a version known for its difficult language—may bore them into disinterest. There is also the issue of Christian exclusivity, as the law would not require readings from other religious or philosophical texts, effectively promoting one religious tradition in a public education setting. Even within Christianity, the KJV is not universally accepted, with many denominations—including Catholics—not considering it a primary translation. The bill’s opt-out clause, which requires parental permission, is also controversial. Critics argue that default participation assumes that Christianity is the norm and that non-Christian students must actively excuse themselves, which could ostracize them. Furthermore, precedent from cases like Abington School District v. Schempp has already determined that mandatory Bible readings in public schools are unconstitutional, reinforcing the argument that this legislation would not stand up to legal scrutiny. There is broader concern that this is part of a larger effort to push Christian nationalism, using historical precedent as justification. However, as critics point out, historical precedent does not inherently validate a practice—slavery, segregation, and other outdated societal norms were once common but are now rightfully condemned. The push to integrate religious teachings into public institutions appears to be less about historical tradition and more about maintaining ideological control in an increasingly secular society. Ultimately, this bill is viewed by opponents as a blatant attempt to erode the separation of church and state, forcing religious doctrine into public education under the guise of tradition. Supporters claim it is a benign acknowledgment of America's Christian heritage, but the reality is that it privileges one religious group at the expense of everyone else. With significant legal hurdles and widespread opposition, this legislation is likely to face strong challenges, both in the courtroom and in public discourse. The Non-Prophets, Episode 24.7.3 featuring Scott Dickie, Stephen Harder, Helen Greene and The Ejector Seat Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support .…
T
The Non-Prophets

A Project 2025 mastermind now holds the reins of the federal bureaucracy Mother Jones, By Isabela Dias, on February 6, 2025 https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2025/02/russell-vought-confirmed-senate-omb-project-2025-christian-nationalism/ The panel dissects the appointment of Russell Vought as the new head of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), highlighting his concerning ties to extremist ideologies. The OMB wields significant power over the allocation of federal funds, affecting everything from defense to social programs. This means Vought, an open Christian nationalist with links to Project 2025, now has enormous influence over the financial workings of the U.S. government. His past includes advocating for the use of military force against protesters, dismantling federal agencies like the EPA, and cutting funding for social services, public education, and reproductive rights.Vought’s think tank, the Center for Renewing America, promotes a theocratic vision for the U.S., openly stating its mission to establish a nation “under God” and dismantle federal protections against corporate and governmental overreach. His policies aim to consolidate executive power and undermine institutions designed to maintain democratic stability. The panel expresses alarm at his ambitions and notes the eerie historical parallels between his rhetoric and past authoritarian regimes.The discussion shifts to the structural issue of how the OMB interacts with Congress. While Congress technically controls the budget, the OMB has discretion in how funds are allocated, allowing someone like Vought to defund agencies by simply depriving them of resources. This loophole, which has existed for decades, now poses a dire risk given Vought’s extremist agenda.Panelists Stephen and EJ, representing perspectives from Canada and Scotland, respectively, contrast their countries’ political systems with the U.S. model. Stephen highlights how Canada’s multi-party system prevents any single ideology from dominating, ensuring political diversity and negotiation. EJ warns that Europe has witnessed the consequences of unchecked fascism before and refuses to stand by while such forces gain traction in the U.S. Both express horror at the open rise of authoritarianism in American politics, particularly the normalization of fascist rhetoric and demonstrations. The conversation concludes on a somber note, with a recognition that while Vought’s appointment is deeply troubling, the fight against authoritarianism is ongoing, and international allies remain committed to resisting its spread. The Non-Prophets, Episode 24.7.2 featuring Scott Dickie, Stephen Harder, Helen Greene and The Ejector Seat Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support .…
T
The Non-Prophets

Trump launches White House faith office to protect Christians Telegraph, By David Millward, on February 6, 2025 https://www.telegraph.co.uk/us/news/2025/02/06/trump-launches-white-house-faith-office-protect-christians/ The segment discusses a new office created by President Trump, the "Faith Office," aimed at addressing perceived anti-Christian bias in the U.S. government. Critics argue this office undermines the Establishment Clause by favoring Christianity, rather than ensuring neutrality in religious matters. Paula White, a controversial figure, has been appointed to lead the office, further fueling concerns. She has a history of promoting extreme Christian views, including anti-LGBTQ+ stances, and has used her ministry’s funds for personal gain, such as purchasing a private jet. The panelists express skepticism about the office's intentions, with some seeing it as a strategy to push conservative Christian agendas, while others fear it might be part of a larger, more insidious plan to legitimize discrimination under the guise of religion. The conversation delves into the idea of using religion as a tool for control, raising questions about whether the office’s creation is a distraction or a first step toward significant legal changes that could grant more power to religious groups. The segment concludes with speculation on how the U.S. Supreme Court might address this issue, with the potential for a ruling on the office's constitutionality. The Non-Prophets, Episode 24.7.1 featuring Scott Dickie, Stephen Harder, Helen Greene and The Ejector Seat Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support .…
T
The Non-Prophets

Mississippi again turns down millions of dollars to feed low-income kids during summer months-to-feed-low-income-kids-during-summer-months/ Mississippi Today, By Kate Royals and Sophia Paffenroth, on February 3, 2025 https://mississippitoday.org/2025/02/03/mississippi-again-turns-down-millions-of-dollars-to-feed-low-income-kids-during-summer-months/ Mississippi has once again rejected millions of dollars in federal aid meant to provide food assistance to low-income children during the summer months. This marks the second consecutive year that Governor Tate Reeves has turned down funding from the Summer Electronic Benefits Transfer (EBT) program, a decision that directly impacts hundreds of thousands of children across the state. The financial impact on struggling families is substantial. During the school year, many low-income families rely on free or reduced-price meals for their children, significantly easing their grocery bills. Without the summer EBT funds, parents are forced to absorb an extra $150 to $200 per month in food costs, stretching already tight budgets even further. For many, this means making difficult choices between essentials like rent, utilities, and food. Reeves’ rejection of the funding also raises concerns about the broader societal consequences of food insecurity. Hunger doesn't just impact individual families—it has ripple effects throughout the economy and education system. A malnourished child struggles to focus and learn, which can contribute to lower test scores, higher dropout rates, and long-term economic disadvantages. The refusal to accept these funds reflects a broader pattern of political leaders prioritizing ideological purity over pragmatic solutions. The state government is actively choosing to let children go hungry rather than accept federal aid, despite the fact that this assistance comes at no cost to the state itself. The argument against an "expanding welfare state" rings hollow when the alternative is widespread child hunger. Mississippi’s rejection of summer EBT funding is a stark example of policy decisions that prioritize political optics over human lives. While nonprofits and local organizations will continue to do what they can, they are no substitute for comprehensive, well-funded programs designed to address food insecurity at scale. As elections approach, voters will have the opportunity to weigh in on these decisions at the ballot box. Until then, thousands of children in Mississippi will continue to face unnecessary hunger—not because the resources don’t exist, but because their leaders refuse to accept them. The Non-Prophets, Episode 24.07.4 featuring Cynthia McDonald, Helen Greene, Eli Slack and Kelley Laughlin Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support .…
T
The Non-Prophets

Legal rights groups urge school leaders not to adopt Texas’ Bible-infused curriculum The Texas Tribune, By Jaden Edison, on January 30, 2025 https://www.texastribune.org/2025/01/30/texas-aclu-bible-bluebonnet-curriculum/#:~:text=The%20American%20Civil%20Liberties%20Union,Learning%2C%20would%20%22unlawfully%20impose%20a The Texas State Board of Education’s recent adoption of the Blue Bonnet curriculum, a Bible-infused educational program, has sparked legal concerns and pushback from civil rights groups. Critics argue that the curriculum heavily integrates Christian ideology, downplays significant historical events like slavery and civil rights struggles, and promotes religious favoritism in public education. Supporters, on the other hand, defend it as a necessary inclusion to properly teach students about history and the influence of Christianity. Adding fuel to the controversy, the state is offering schools $60 per student to implement the curriculum, raising concerns about whether this amounts to coercion. Legal organizations are warning school districts of potential constitutional violations, particularly regarding the separation of church and state. Texas now joins other states like Louisiana and Oklahoma in pushing religiously motivated education policies, with legal battles looming on the horizon. The broader issue at play is where the line should be drawn between education and indoctrination. If a curriculum truly aimed to educate about religious diversity, it would include perspectives from multiple faiths, rather than elevating Christianity above all others. Yet, attempts to introduce other religious viewpoints often meet resistance. A recent Supreme Court ruling weakened the “Lemon Test,” a key standard for determining church-state separation, further blurring the legal boundaries. The concern now is that similar religiously motivated educational policies could spread unchecked, challenging secular principles in public education. This push for Christian-centric education also exposes the hypocrisy in religious privilege. If proponents argue that the majority should dictate educational content in a democracy, then why aren’t non-Christian perspectives equally considered? While groups like the Satanic Temple and some Jewish organizations have challenged such policies in court, these efforts often receive less attention. The core issue remains: why does Christianity receive special treatment while other faiths and secular viewpoints are marginalized? With legal battles ahead, the role of religion in public schools may soon face even greater scrutiny. The Non-Prophets, Episode 24.07.3 featuring Cynthia McDonald, Helen Greene, Eli Slack and Kelley Laughlin Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support .…
T
The Non-Prophets

Pastor who compared Trump to Hitler is pushed out of church Mail Online, By Bethan Sexton, on February 4, 2025 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14359493/pastor-compared-Trump-Hitler-church-charlotte-myers-park-baptist.htm Dr. Ben Boswell, a pastor at Myers Park Baptist Church in Charlotte, North Carolina, was asked to resign after church attendance declined during his tenure, which began in 2016. While church leaders insist his removal was due to dwindling attendance rather than his progressive sermons, critics argue that his messages of inclusivity, racial justice, and political awareness alienated white congregants who didn't want to confront issues of privilege. The discussion highlights the tension between religious institutions preaching social justice and the financial realities of maintaining a congregation. The panelists note the irony of a church claiming to support inclusivity but rejecting the social consequences of that stance. They also debate whether churches should engage in politics at all or focus solely on social work, like aiding the poor, without taking a political stance. Ultimately, the conversation underscores the broader trend of declining church attendance and the struggle for relevance in modern religious spaces. The Non-Prophets, Episode 24.07.2 featuring Cynthia McDonald, Helen Greene, Eli Slack and Kelley Laughlin Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support .…
T
The Non-Prophets

Priest Booted From Church After Imitating Musk's Salute The Daily Beast, By Emell Derra Adolphus, on January 30, 2025 https://www.thedailybeast.com/right-wing-catholic-priest-father-calvin-robinson-hits-the-musk-salute-at-pro-life-talk/ Father Calvin Robinson, a right-wing priest with ties to the UK’s far-right movement, was removed from his church after performing a salute reminiscent of Elon Musk’s controversial gesture at Trump’s inauguration rally. Robinson claims it was a joke mocking liberal outrage, but the Anglican Catholic Church took swift action, drawing a clear line between political expression and extremist signaling. The panel discusses the implications of religious leaders engaging in radical rhetoric and contrasts Robinson’s actions with Minister Buddy’s call for compassion and inclusion. They note the long history of religious institutions aligning with fascism and mock Robinson’s complaints that liberals criticizing him are the real fascists. They also find it ironic that he claims victimhood after deliberately provoking outrage. The discussion highlights the hypocrisy of extremists using religion as a shield while pushing hateful ideologies. The Non-Prophets, Episode 24.07.1 featuring Cynthia McDonald, Helen Greene, Eli Slack and Kelley Laughlin Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support .…
T
The Non-Prophets

Republican congressman suggests some children receiving free school lunches should work at McDonald’s instead NBC News, By Rebecca Shabad, on January 28, 2025 https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/republican-congressman-suggests-children-receiving-free-school-lunches-rcna189614 In this discussion, the panelists criticize Georgia Congressman Rich McCormick's recent statement suggesting that children who receive free school lunches should get jobs to cover the cost. McCormick's stance is described as misguided and harmful, with one panelist comparing it to a villainous plot to push child labor. The panelists argue that such policies undermine efforts to support low-income families, including Head Start and Meals on Wheels. They also point out the systemic problems that cause poverty, such as inflation, stagnant wages, and lack of access to healthcare. The group expresses frustration with politicians who use these issues as an excuse to vilify the poor, rather than addressing the underlying causes. They also critique the notion that children need to work for their value, highlighting how such attitudes fail to consider the importance of education and childhood development. The Non-Prophets, Episode 24.06.4 featuring Jimmy Jr., Helen Greene, Rob, and AJ Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support .…
T
The Non-Prophets

After 'faith-healing' death of 8-year-old girl, 14 Christians found guilty of manslaughter The Friendly Atheist, By Hemant Mehta, on January 29, 2025 https://www.friendlyatheist.com/p/after-faith-healing-death-of-8-year This tragic story highlights the devastating consequences of extreme religious beliefs, where a young girl, Elizabeth St, lost her life due to the refusal of essential medical care. Elizabeth's parents, guided by their Christian cult, chose to pray for her healing instead of administering insulin for her type 1 diabetes. Despite earlier warnings and a hospitalization scare, they continued their faith-based approach, leading to her death after six days without insulin. The court convicted 14 members of the cult for manslaughter, but many questioned why it wasn’t considered murder, as the parents' refusal to provide medical care was based on deeply held religious beliefs. The case has sparked outrage, especially given that the parents had already been warned about the dangers of their actions. Advocates argue that religion shouldn't shield harmful behavior, and the legal system failed to properly address the severity of the situation. This event raises broader concerns about the role of religion in medical decisions and the safety of children in similar faith-based communities. Some also feel the medical and legal systems failed Elizabeth, as her earlier hospitalization should have prompted closer oversight. The Non-Prophets, Episode 24.06.3 featuring Jimmy Jr., Helen Greene, Rob, and AJ Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support .…
T
The Non-Prophets

The discussion centers on the issue of child marriage in Bangladesh, as highlighted by an article from The Telegraph and supplemented by another interview. It delves into the societal, economic, and cultural factors driving child marriage, particularly for girls. The narrative also touches on the importance of education, as many girls, despite their dreams of a different future, are often sold into marriage due to poverty, lack of education, and religious pressures that see women as secondary to men. There's recognition of both the tragedy of the situation and the attempts to help through educational programs, which aim to change the generational cycle of poverty and oppression. The discussion also highlights how both boys and girls face marriage at young ages due to poverty, though girls face more extreme abuses. There is a consensus on the necessity of education and economic support for families to prevent child marriage and provide hope for the next generation. Telegraph, By Tom Parry, on January 20, 2025 https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/women-and-girls/bangladesh-child-marriage-girl-brides-brac-school-education/ The Non-Prophets, Episode 24.06.2 featuring Jimmy Jr., Helen Greene, Rob, and AJ Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support .…
T
The Non-Prophets

Scientists reveal the surprising height of the Biblical giant Goliath Daily Mail Online, By Wiliam Hunter, on January 26, 2025 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-14317919/Scientists-reveal-Goliath-height-Bible.html In this discussion, the panel dives into the controversy surrounding Goliath's height and the potential medical diagnosis of gigantism. The article in question suggests that Goliath may have had gigantism, a condition caused by an overproduction of growth hormone, leading to extreme height and other health problems. The conversation shifts to whether this medical condition would make Goliath a fitting candidate for the biblical fight against David. Some members of the panel question the relevance of such historical details, arguing that it doesn't really matter in the broader scope of faith or mythology. However, others explore how the story of David and Goliath could be a literary device designed to symbolize something larger than just a battle of physical strength. They suggest that the story, in its exaggerated form, might have been created to illustrate the triumph of the underdog, with David's victory representing divine intervention over seemingly insurmountable odds. The team also discusses how the details surrounding Goliath's size and medical condition might be less important than the symbolic meaning behind the story, urging a shift from focusing on historical accuracy to examining the underlying narrative. Ultimately, they conclude that the specifics of Goliath’s height and health issues may matter less than the lesson conveyed in the biblical tale. The Non-Prophets, Episode 24.06.1 featuring Jimmy Jr., Helen Greene, Rob, and AJ Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support .…
Bishop urges mercy for immigrants, Trump calls her 'nasty' Reuters, By Steve Holland and Jeff Mason, on January 22, 2025 https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-attends-prayer-service-gets-an-earful-immigrants-lgbt-youth-2025-01-21/ This conversation highlights a striking moment in political and social discourse, where a religious leader felt compelled to speak out and remind a president, in this case, Donald Trump, to have compassion for others. The discussion centers on the disconnect between those in power, their words, and how they affect vulnerable communities. The episode explores how people like Trump, who lack introspection, have risen to power and whether such figures should be trusted with significant authority. There's also a deeper commentary on the current state of democracy and the unsettling trend of unqualified individuals reaching top political positions. The Non-Prophets, Episode 24.05.4 featuring Phoebe Rose, Helen Greene, and Aaron Jensen Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support .…
Black America Drags Old-Fashion Pastor Who Forced A Woman to Apologize to the Church for Being Pregnant Yahoo News/The Root, By Phenix S Halley, on January 9, 2025 https://www.yahoo.com/news/virginia-pastor-forces-woman-apologize-194700753.html This Segment discusses the troubling dynamics of societal and religious shaming regarding sex and pregnancy outside of marriage. The focus is on a young woman who was forced to apologize to her church after becoming pregnant out of wedlock. The pastor's harsh response, including the denial of a baby shower and social ostracization, is scrutinized. The panelists express outrage over the double standard that allows men to avoid blame while women bear the brunt of the shame. They critique the persistence of outdated, misogynistic views on sex and sexuality, particularly within religious contexts. The conversation expands to the damage done by purity culture, repressing natural human desires and perpetuating harmful stereotypes about women's roles in sexual relationships. The Non-Prophets, Episode 24.05.3 featuring Phoebe Rose, Helen Greene, and Aaron Jensen Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support .…
مرحبًا بك في مشغل أف ام!
يقوم برنامج مشغل أف أم بمسح الويب للحصول على بودكاست عالية الجودة لتستمتع بها الآن. إنه أفضل تطبيق بودكاست ويعمل على أجهزة اندرويد والأيفون والويب. قم بالتسجيل لمزامنة الاشتراكات عبر الأجهزة.