أفضل بودكاسات MPE (2025)

1
MPEP Q & A 329: Non-exhaustive factors to determine whether to accept a petition after the 2-month period. 2:43

3d ago2:43

2:43

Question: What non-exhaustive factors may be considered to determine whether to accept a petition after the 2-month period? Answer: The following non-exhaustive factors may be considered to determine whether to accept a petition after the 2-month period: (1) Petitioner engaged in significant, constructive efforts with the examiner to resolve the is…

1
Hidden, Not Forgotten — When God Puts You in a Vault Before He Puts You on a Stage 8:08

10d ago8:08

8:08

Welcome to the episode you didn’t know you needed — until now. In Episode 4 of The Situation Room, Joy Mpezeni pulls back the curtain on the sacred season of divine obscurity — when God hand-selects you, anoints you, and then hides you. This isn't about rejection. It’s not about punishment. It’s about preparation. Joy transparently shares the emoti…

1
MPEP Q & A 328: Reasons for insisting upon a restriction? 2:32

17d ago2:32

2:32

Question: What are the reasons for insisting upon a restriction? Answer: Every requirement to restrict has two aspects: (A) the reasons (as distinguished from the mere statement of conclusion) why each inventionas claimed is either independent or distinct from the other(s); and (B) the reasons why there would be a serious search and/or examination …

1
You’re Not the Practice Round — Situationships, Soul Ties & the Strategy to Break Free 9:01

17d ago9:01

9:01

In this bold and unfiltered episode of The Situation Room, Joy Mpezeni dives headfirst into the toxic, confusing world of situationships and exposes the spiritual warfare behind casual connections that cost you purpose. You’re not confused — you’re being spiritually drained. You’re not behind — you’re being strategically distracted. This episode un…

1
From Survival to Strategy: The Power of a Rebuilt Mind 9:52

24d ago9:52

9:52

Welcome back to The Situation Room — where strategy meets Spirit, and survival is no longer your final destination. In this fire-filled episode, Joy Mpezeni dives deep into the mindset shift that separates those who keep circling the same mountain from those who step into legacy with precision. If you’ve done the healing but still feel stuck, this …

1
MPEP Q & A 327: Information submitted for each patent on which a maintenance fee or surcharge is paid. 2:15

1M ago2:15

2:15

Question: What information should also be submitted for each patent on which a maintenance fee or surcharge is paid? Answer: The following information should also be submitted for each patent on which a maintenance fee or surcharge is paid: (A) the fee year (i.e., 3 1/2, 7 1/2, or 11 1/2 year fee); (B) the […] The post MPEP Q & A 327: Information s…

1
You’re Cleared for Strategy 7:00

1M ago7:00

7:00

Welcome to The Situation Room — where strategy meets spirit, and divine blueprints are born. In this debut episode, Joy Mpezeni lays the foundation for what’s coming: a podcast powered by prophetic precision, practical wisdom, and unapologetic truth. No fluff, no filters — just Kingdom strategy for men and women who are tired of circling the same m…

1
MPEP Q & A 326: Applications that count for “gross income” basis micro entity status. 2:44

2M ago2:44

2:44

Question: What applications count for the filing limits for the purposes of establishing micro entity status under the “gross income” basis? Answer: For purposes of establishing micro entity status under the “gross income” basis, the application filing limit includes: (i) previously filed U.S. nonprovisional applications (e.g., utility, design, pla…

1
MPEP Q & A 325: List the pieces of information that should be placed on the first page of a protest. 2:53

2M ago2:53

2:53

Question: List two pieces of information that should be placed on the first page of a protest. Answer: Each protest should be clearly identified as a “PROTEST UNDER 37 CFR 1.291.” It is also important that any protest against a pending application specifically identify the application to which the protest is directed with the identification being […

1
MPEP Q & A 324: Name items that must be submitted when adding a “Sequence Listing” after the application filing date. 3:01

2M ago3:01

3:01

Question: Name at least two items that must be submitted when adding a “Sequence Listing” after the application filing date. Answer: Adding a “Sequence Listing” after the application filing date involves the submission of: (1) a “Sequence Listing” either as a PDF image file, on physical sheets of paper, or as an ASCII plain text […] The post MPEP Q…

1
MPEP Q & A 323: Can distinct subject matter be recovered by filing a reissue application in specific cases? 3:19

3M ago3:19

3:19

Question: Where a restriction (including an election of species) requirement was made in an application and applicant permitted the elected invention to issue as a patent without filing a divisional application on the non-elected invention(s) or on non-claimed subject matter distinct from the elected invention, can the non-elected invention(s) and …

1
MPEP Q & A 322: What type of Demand will prevent an international application designating the U.S. to enter? 2:26

3M ago2:26

2:26

Question: What type of Demand will prevent an international application designating the U.S. to enter the national stage via the U.S. Designated Office? Answer: An international application designating the U.S. will enter the national stage via the U.S. Designated Office unless a Demand electing the U.S. is filed under PCT Article 31 whereupon entr…

1
MPEP Q & A 321: What are the factual inquiries related to obviousness? 3:41

4M ago3:41

3:41

Question: What are the factual inquiries related to obviousness that the Court enunciates? Answer: Obviousness is a question of law based on underlying factual inquiries. The factual inquiries enunciated by the Court are as follows: (A) Determining the scope and content of the prior art; (B) Ascertaining the differences between the claimed inventio…

1
MPEP Q & A 320: What are the three types of designs interpreted by case law to include? 2:22

4M ago2:22

2:22

Question: What are the three types of designs the language “new, original and ornamental design for an article of manufacture” has been interpreted by the case law to include? Answer: The language “new, original and ornamental design for an article of manufacture” has been interpreted by the case law to include at least three kinds of designs: […] …

1
MPEP Q & A 319: What must any assignment-related document for patent matters submitted by facsimile include? 2:11

5M ago2:11

2:11

Question: What three items must any assignment-related document for patent matters submitted by facsimile include? Answer: Any assignment-related document for patent matters submitted by facsimile must include: (A) an identified application or patent number; (B) one cover sheet to record a single transaction; and (C) payment of the recordation fee …

1
MPEP Q & A 318: Requirements of an oath or declaration under section 37 CFR 1.63. 2:39

5M ago2:39

2:39

Question: Name two requirements of an oath or declaration under section 37 CFR 1.63? Answer: An oath or declaration under section 37 CFR 1.63 must: (1) Identify the inventor or joint inventor executing the oath or declaration by his or her legal name; (2) Identify the application to which it is directed; (3) Include a […] The post MPEP Q & A 318: R…

1
MPEP Q & A 317: How can you determine whether the original patent requirement is satisfied in a reissue application? 3:02

6M ago3:02

3:02

Question: How can you determine whether the original patent requirement is satisfied in a reissue application? Answer: Examiners should review the reissue application to determine whether the original patent requirement is satisfied, by considering if: (A) the claims presented in the reissue application are described in the original patent specific…

1
MPEP Q & A 316: Is it ever necessary to change the inventorship named in the application? 3:52

6M ago3:52

3:52

Question: If an application by joint inventors includes more than one independent and distinct invention, and restriction is required, is it ever necessary to change the inventorship named in the application? Answer: If an application by joint inventors includes more than one independent and distinct invention, and restriction is required, it may b…

1
MPEP Q & A 315: List examples of situations that confirm a “real world” context of use. 3:11

7M ago3:11

3:11

Question: List two examples of situations that require or constitute carrying out further research to identify or reasonably confirm a “real world” context of use and, therefore, do not define “substantial utilities.” Answer: The following are examples of situations that require or constitute carrying out further research to identify or reasonably …

1
MPEP Q & A 314: What will the request indicate for each patent and printed publication cited in the request? 3:30

7M ago3:30

3:30

Question: When an examiner concludes that no substantial new question of patentability has been raised, they will prepare a decision denying the reexamination request. What will that request indicate for each patent and printed publication cited in the request? Answer: If the examiner concludes that no substantial new question of patentability has …

1
MPEP Q & A 313: Reasons why the Office will withdraw the application from issue. 2:19

8M ago2:19

2:19

Question: Once the issue fee has been paid, list two reasons why the Office will withdraw the application from issue at its own initiative. Answer: Once the issue fee has been paid, the Office will not withdraw the application from issue at its own initiative for any reason except: (1) A mistake on the part […] The post MPEP Q & A 313: Reasons why …

1
MPEP Q & A 312: List two General Plastic non-exclusive factors. 3:18

8M ago3:18

3:18

Question: List two General Plastic non-exclusive factors. Answer: The General Plastic non-exclusive factors include the following: Whether the same petitioner previously filed a petition directed to the same claims of the same patent; Whether at the time of filing of the first petition the petitioner knew of the prior art asserted in the second pet…

1
MPEP Q & A 311: Two requirements for a petition for suspension of action under 37 CFR 1.103(a) 3:23

9M ago3:23

3:23

Question: List two requirements for a petition for suspension of action under 37 CFR 1.103(a). Answer: A petition for suspension of action under 37 CFR 1.103(a) must: (A) be presented as a separate paper; (B) be accompanied by the petition fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(g); (C) request a specific and reasonable period of suspension not greater than […

1
MPEP Q & A 310: List two examples of notices issued as part of the pre-examination processing of an application 3:29

9M ago3:29

3:29

Question: The three-month period in 37 CFR 1.704(b) applies to the Office notices and letters issued as part of the pre-examination processing of an application (except a Notice of Omitted Items in a Nonprovisional Application as discussed above). List two examples of these notices. Answer: These notices include: A Notice of Incomplete Nonprovision…

1
MPEP Q & A 309: List two requirements for adding a “Sequence Listing” after the application filing date? 3:15

9M ago3:15

3:15

Question: List two requirements for adding a “Sequence Listing” after the application filing date? Answer: Adding a “Sequence Listing” after the application filing date involves the submission of: a “Sequence Listing” either as a PDF image file, on physical sheets of paper, or as an ASCII plain text file submitted via the USPTO patent electronic [……

1
MPEP Q & A 308: What type of arguments should a patent owner preliminary response include? 3:35

10M ago3:35

3:35

Question: What type of arguments should a patent owner preliminary response include? Answer: A patent owner preliminary response may include one or more of the following arguments: The petitioner is statutorily barred from pursuing a review; The references asserted to establish that the claims are unpatentable are not in fact printed publications; …

1
MPEP Q & A 307: When are electronic means or medium for filing IDSs permitted? 2:55

10M ago2:55

2:55

Question: When are electronic means or medium for filing IDSs permitted? Answer: As shown in chapter 600 … Electronic means or medium for filing IDSs are not permitted except for: IDSs electronically submitted using the USPTO patent electronic filing system; or copies of large tables, computer program listings, and sequence listings submitted as a …

1
MPEP Q & A 306: Sealed confidential information prior to the institution of the trial by which options? 3:05

11M ago3:05

3:05

Question: Where a petitioner files a motion to seal with the petition that seeks entry of a protective order other than the default protective order, a patent owner may only access the sealed confidential information prior to the institution of the trial by which options? Answer: Where a petitioner files a motion to seal with […] The post MPEP Q & …

1
MPEP Q & A 305: What must the supplemental search fee be accompanied by in addition to the payment? 2:29

11M ago2:29

2:29

Question: What must the supplemental search fee be accompanied by in addition to the payment? Answer: As shown in chapter 1800 … The supplemental search fee must be paid and be accompanied by: a protest and a request for refund of the supplemental search fee. Chapter Details: The answer to this question can be found […] The post MPEP Q & A 305: Wha…

1
MPEP Q & A 304: What does routine discovery include? 3:03

12M ago3:03

3:03

Question: What does routine discovery include? Answer: Routine discovery includes: Production of any exhibit cited in a paper or testimony; The cross-examination of the other sides declarants; and Relevant information that is inconsistent with a position advanced during the proceeding. Routine discovery places the parties on a level playing field a…

1
Telikoi Basket League 23/24 Game 1 & 2 55:52

12M ago55:52

55:52

Μπει Δεν Μπει μετά τις δύο πρώτες νίκες του Ολυμπιακού στους φετινούς τελικούς, συζητάμε τι είδαμε μέχρι τώρα και τι αναμένουμε στα επόμενα παιχνίδια. https://instagram.com/the_mpei_den_mpei_podcast?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y= https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100086766044764بقلم Dimitris & Bill

1
MPEP Q & A 303: What should a certificate of correction filed via the patent electronic filing system use as the document description? 2:15

1y ago2:15

2:15

Question: What should a request for a certificate of correction filed via the patent electronic filing system use as the document description? Answer: “A request for a certificate of correction filed via the patent electronic filing system should use the document description: Request for Certificate of Correction.” Chapter Details: The answer to th…

1
MPEP Q & A 302: Major differences between 35 U.S.C. 102(c) and the CREATE Act 3:30

1y ago3:30

3:30

Question: What are the major differences between 35 U.S.C. 102(c) and the CREATE Act? Answer: The major differences between 35 U.S.C. 102(c) and the CREATE Act are the following: 35 U.S.C. 102(c)is keyed to the effective filing date of the claimed invention, while the CREATE Act (pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c)) focuses on the date that the claimed invent…

1
MPEP Q & A 301: What does the prohibition on ex parte communications not extend to? 3:19

1y ago3:19

3:19

Question: All substantive communications with the Board regarding a proceeding must include all parties to the proceeding, except as otherwise authorized. What does the prohibition on ex parte communications not extend to? Answer: All substantive communications with the Board regarding a proceeding must include all parties to the proceeding, except…

1
MPEP Q & A 300: Difference between sequence listing requirements filed before or after July 1, 2022 3:55

1y ago3:55

3:55

Question: What is the difference between sequence listing requirements filed before or after July 1, 2022? Answer: For applications filed before July 1, 2022, the sequence listing can be a “Sequence Listing” (as an ACSII plain text file in compliance with 37 CFR 1.821-1.824) submission must be submitted via the USPTO patent electronic filing system…

1
MPEP Q & A 299: What should a motion to exclude evidence include? 3:23

1y ago3:23

3:23

Question: What should a motion to exclude evidence include? Answer: A motion to exclude evidence should: (a) Identify where in the record the objection originally was made; (b) Identify where in the record the evidence sought to be excluded was relied upon by an opponent; (c) Address objections to exhibits in numerical order; and (d) […] The post M…

1
Young and Ready by 30 | Pastor Augustine 33:23

1y ago33:23

33:23

God calls everyone to be ready for War by 20 years old! (Number 1:3) It's your time to step out in Faith and do exploits for the Lord this year! Discover how to step out in faith and make a difference for the Lord in this pivotal year of your life. In this episode, we'll guide you through what needs to be accomplished and provide practical insights…

1
MPEP Q & A 298: Submission requirements for “Sequence Listing XML” 3:09

1y ago3:09

3:09

Question: A “Sequence Listing XML” may be submitted as a XML file with a “.xml” extension via the USPTO patent electronic filing system or as read-only optical discs. What does such a submission require? Answer: Such submission requires that applicant provide a statement in a separate paragraph that incorporates by reference the material in the […]…

1
MPEP Q & A 297: List two situations where a certificate of correction may not be appropriate. 3:37

1y ago3:37

3:37

Question: List two exemplary situations where a certificate of correction under 35 U.S.C. 255 may not be appropriate. Answer: Exemplary situations where a certificate of correction under 35 U.S.C. 255 may not be appropriate: (A) Adding or correcting a claim to a prior application having a filing date before March 16, 2013 in a patent that was exami…

1
MPEP Q & A 296: List the criteria for “Large Tables” 2:48

1+ y ago2:48

2:48

Question: List the criteria for “Large Tables” that may be submitted in electronic form in ASCII plain text. Answer: “Large Tables” that may be submitted in electronic form in ASCII plain text are: any individual table that is more than 50 pages in length, or multiple tables, if the total number of pages of all […] The post MPEP Q & A 296: List the…

1
Lügen und ADHS 8:57

1+ y ago8:57

8:57

Lügen und ADHS Dauer: 0:08:57 ADHS - für Kosmonautinnen, Sternengucker und Traumtänzer In dieser Podcastfolge meines "creativ-chaoten" Podcasts untersuche ich das Thema "Lügen und ADHS" eingehend. Ich beginne mit einer Definition von Lügen und diskutiere dann, warum Menschen mit ADHS oft fälschlicherweise als häufige Lügner angesehen werden. Ich er…

1
MPEP Q & A 295: Which of the new trial proceedings can the patent owner file a preliminary response for? 2:49

1+ y ago2:49

2:49

Question: Which of the following new trial proceedings can the patent owner file a preliminary response for? Answer: The patent owner is afforded an opportunity to file a preliminary response for inter partes review (IPR), postgrant review (PGR), and covered business method patents (CBM). Chapter Details: This question comes from the following supp…

1
MPEP Q & A 294: What are the two aspects every requirement to restrict has? 2:39

1+ y ago2:39

2:39

Question: What are the two aspects every requirement to restrict has? Answer: Every requirement to restrict has two aspects: the reasons (as distinguished from the mere statement of conclusion) why each invention as claimedis either independent or distinct from the other(s); and the reasons why there would be a serious search and/or examination bur…

1
MPEP Q & A 293: Who conducts derivation proceedings, inter partes reviews, and post-grant reviews? 2:23

1+ y ago2:23

2:23

Question: Who conducts derivation proceedings, inter partes reviews, and post-grant reviews? Answer: The Board is to conduct derivation proceedings, inter partes reviews, and post-grant reviews. Chapter Details: This question comes from the following supplement “Patent Trial and Appeal Board Consolidated Trial Practice Guide November 2019”. This is…

1
MPEP Q & A 292: Two changes the Hague Agreement Article 16(1) provides 3:22

1+ y ago3:22

3:22

Question: List two changes the Hague Agreement Article 16(1) provides for in the International Register by the International Bureau. Answer: Hague Agreement Article 16(1) provides for the recording of certain changes in the International Register by the International Bureau, including: a change in ownership of the international registration; a chan…

1
MPEP Q & A 291: When did the derivation rules go into effect? 2:30

1+ y ago2:30

2:30

Question: When did the derivation rules go into effect? Answer: The derivation rules went into effect 18 months after AIA enactment (March 16, 2013). Chapter Details: This question comes from the following supplement “Patent Trial and Appeal Board Consolidated Trial Practice Guide November 2019”. This is a special supplement that at the time of thi…

1
MPEP Q & A 290: Use of metric system of measurements in patent applications 3:12

1+ y ago3:12

3:12

Question: How should measurements be given within a patent application? Answer: In order to minimize the necessity in the future for converting dimensions given in the English system of measurements to the metric system of measurements when using printed patents as research and prior art search documents, all patent applicants should use the metric…

1
MPEP Q & A 289: List two situations that are not considered new grounds of rejection? 3:51

1+ y ago3:51

3:51

Question: List two situations that are not considered new grounds of rejection? Answer: Where the statutory basis for the rejection remains the same, and the evidence relied upon in support of the rejection remains the same, a change in the discussion of, or rationale in support of, the rejection does not necessarily constitute a new […] The post M…

1
MPEP Q & A 288: How may an examiner treat an amendment not fully responsive to a non-final Office action? 3:12

1+ y ago3:12

3:12

Question: How may an examiner treat an amendment not fully responsive to a non-final Office action? Answer: An examiner may treat an amendment not fully responsive to a non-final Office action by: (A) accepting the amendment as an adequate reply to the non-final Office action to avoid abandonment under 35 U.S.C. 133 and 37 CFR1.135; […] The post MP…

1
MPEP Q & A 287: When inconsistent information is given for an application data sheet, what submission will govern control? 3:58

1+ y ago3:58

3:58

Question: When inconsistent information is given for an application data sheet, what submission will govern control according to 37 CFR 1.76(d)(1)? Answer: 37 CFR 1.76(d)(1) provides that the most recent submission will govern (control) with respect to inconsistencies as between the information provided in an application data sheet, a designation o…

المدونة الصوتية تستحق الاستماع

MPE بودكاست

المدونة الصوتية تستحق الاستماع

دليل مرجعي سريع