أفضل بودكاسات SCOTUS (2025)

1
Unilateral Executive Power Versus Education's Future 16:15

4M ago16:15

16:15

This document presents a dissenting opinion from Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justices Kagan and Jackson, regarding the Supreme Court's decision to grant a stay in the case of Linda McMahon, Secretary of Education, et al. v. New York, et al.The core of the dissent is a strong objection to the Executive Branch's unilateral efforts to dismantle the D…

1
Trump v. American Federation of Government Employees Stay Decision 17:26

4M ago17:26

17:26

The provided text presents a Supreme Court decision regarding a stay application in the case of Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. v. American Federation of Government Employees, et al. The majority opinion grants a stayof a preliminary injunction, indicating that the Government is likely to succeed in arguing the legality of a…

1
Goldey v. Field (Bivens / Excessive Force) 5:31

4M ago5:31

5:31

Send us a text Goldey v. Fields PER CURIAM. In Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents, 403 U. S. 388 (1971), this Court recognized an implied cause of action for damages against federal officers for certain alleged violations of the Fourth Amendment. The Court subsequently recognized two additional contexts where implied Bivens causes of actio…

1
Trump v. CASA, Inc. (Universal Injunction / Birthright Citizenship) 14:21

4M ago14:21

14:21

Send us a text Trump v. CASA, Inc. Held: Universal injunctions likely exceed the equitable authority that Congress has given to federal courts. The Court grants the Government’s applications for a partial stay of the injunctions entered below, but only to the extent that the injunctions are broader than necessary to provide complete relief to each …

1
Kennedy v. Braidwood Management, Inc. (Appointments Clause) 13:58

4M ago13:58

13:58

Send us a text Kennedy v. Braidwood Management, Inc. In 1984, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) created the U. S. Preventive Services Task Force, a body that formulates evidence-based recommendations regarding preventive healthcare services. Congress codified the Task Force’s role in 1999, establishing it as an entity within the Age…

1
FCC v. Consumer Research (Nondelegation Doctrine) 15:53

4M ago15:53

15:53

Send us a text FCC v. Consumers’ Research The Communications Act of 1934 established the FCC and instructed it to make available to “all the people of the United States,” reliable communications services “at reasonable charges.” 47 U. S. C. §151. That objective is today known as “universal service.” The universal-service project arose from the conc…

1
Mahmoud v. Taylor (LGBTQ+ Books / Parental Opt-Out) 14:35

4M ago14:35

14:35

Send us a text Held: Parents challenging the Board’s introduction of the “LGBTQ+-inclusive” storybooks, along with its decision to withhold opt outs, are entitled to a preliminary injunction. Read by Jeff Barnum.بقلم Jake Leahy

1
Religious Charity Tax Exemption Ruling 14:56

4M ago14:56

14:56

A Notebook LM generated case review of a United State Supreme Court decision including opinion, the majority opinion, concurring opinion by Justice Thomas, and concurring opinion by Justice Jackson, that centers on a case where Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc., and its sub-entities challenged Wisconsin's unemployment compensation tax exemption. The …

1
Mexico's Gun Lawsuit Barred by PLCAA 18:42

4M ago18:42

18:42

A Notebook LM generated review of a 2025 United States Supreme Court opinion concerning a lawsuit brought by the Government of Mexico against several American gun manufacturers. The core issue revolves around the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), a federal law that generally bars lawsuits against firearm manufacturers for harm caus…

1
Ames v. Ohio: Title VII Disparate Treatment Standard 11:36

4M ago11:36

11:36

A Notebook LM generated review of a United States Supreme Court opinion in the case of Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, along with a concurring opinion. The Syllabus and Opinion of the Court address the "background circumstances" rule, which required majority-group plaintiffs in Title VII discrimination cases to meet a heightened evidenti…

1
Disabled Students' Equal Rights to Education 12:07

4M ago12:07

12:07

Notebook LM review of United States Supreme Court opinion in the case of A. J. T. v. Osseo Area Schools, Independent School District No. 279, et al., decided in June 2025. This document, including the Syllabus and the Court's opinion delivered by Chief Justice Roberts, along with concurring opinions by Justices Thomas and Sotomayor, addresses the l…

1
Wrong House, Right to Sue: Martin v. United States 12:49

4M ago12:49

12:49

The provided text consists of excerpts from a Supreme Court syllabus and opinion in the case of Martin v. United States, decided in 2025. The core of the case concerns the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), specifically addressing two points of law disputed by the Eleventh Circuit. First, the Court clarifies that the FTCA's "law enforcement proviso" o…

1
Tax Court Jurisdiction After Levy Abandonment 15:13

4M ago15:13

15:13

A Notebook LM generated review of a June 2025 United States Supreme Court opinion and accompanying dissenting opinion address Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Zuch, a case concerning the jurisdiction of the United States Tax Court. The majority opinion holds that the Tax Court's authority to review a Collection Due Process (CDP) hearing ends onc…

1
Rivers v. Guerrero: Defining Successive Habeas Petitions 14:39

4M ago14:39

14:39

A Notebook LLM review of a June 2025 United States Supreme Court syllabus and opinion in the case of Rivers v. Guerrero. This case addresses a crucial point in federal habeas corpus law, specifically defining when a second-in-time habeas petitionis considered "second or successive" under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AE…

1
United States v. Skrmetti: Transgender Care and Equal Protection 20:06

4M ago20:06

20:06

A Notebook LM review of June 2025 United States Supreme Court syllabus and opinion in the case of United States v. Skrmetti, which addresses the constitutionality of a Tennessee law (SB1) prohibiting certain medical treatments for transgender minors. The Court affirms the Sixth Circuit's decision, finding that SB1 is not subject to heightened scrut…

1
Fuld v. PLO: Due Process and Foreign Terrorism Claims 12:46

4M ago12:46

12:46

A Notebook LM review of a June 2025 United States Supreme Court opinion concerning the constitutionality of the Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act (PSJVTA), specifically its provisions for personal jurisdiction over the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and the Palestinian Authority (PA). The core issue is whether the…

1
Stanley v. City of Sanford: Disability Discrimination and Retiree Benefits 15:41

4M ago15:41

15:41

A Notebook LM review of a June 2025 United States Supreme Court opinion concerning a firefighter, Karyn Stanley, who sued the City of Sanford, Florida, alleging discrimination under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) after her disability forced her into early retirement and reduced her health insurance benefits. The majority opini…

1
Fuel Producers' Standing to Challenge EPA Regulations 13:53

4M ago13:53

13:53

Notebook LM review of a July 2025 Supreme Court opinion in the case of Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC, et al. v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al., along with two dissenting opinions. The central issue discussed is whether fuel producers have Article III standing to challenge the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) approval of California…

1
Judicial Review of Agency Orders: McLaughlin Chiropractors v. McKesson 17:55

4M ago17:55

17:55

A Notebook LM review of a June 2025 United States Supreme Court case, McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp. et al., concerning the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) and the Hobbs Act. The core issue revolves around whether district courts are bound by an agency's interpretation of a statute in civil enforcement proceedin…

1
FDA v. RJ Reynolds Vapor Co.: Retailer Standing to Sue 14:33

4M ago14:33

14:33

A Notebook LM review of a June 2025 United States Supreme Court opinion addressing whether retailers of "new tobacco products" can judicially challenge a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) denial of a manufacturer's marketing application under the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (TCA). The majority opinion affirms the Fifth Circui…

1
Riley v. Bondi: Immigration Appeal Finality 14:05

4M ago14:05

14:05

A Notebook LM review of the June 2025 United States Supreme Court case of Riley v. Bondi, Attorney General, addressing two key issues regarding judicial review of immigration decisions. First, it determines that an order from the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying Convention Against Torture (CAT) relief is not considered a "final order of r…

1
Gutierrez v. Saenz: Due Process and DNA Testing Standing 14:54

4M ago14:54

14:54

This is a Notebook LM review of a June 2025, United States Supreme Court opinion concerning a death-row inmate, Ruben Gutierrez, and his challenge to Texas's DNA testing procedures. Gutierrez, convicted of capital murder, seeks DNA testing of crime scene evidence, believing it will prove his innocence of the death penalty. The Court's majority opin…

1
Medicaid and Section 1983 Enforcement Rights: Medina v. Planned Parenthood 15:19

4M ago15:19

15:19

A Notebook LM overview of the opinion in Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic et al., decided by the United States Supreme Court in June of 2025. This case examines whether individuals receiving Medicaidbenefits can sue state officials under 42 U.S.C. §1983 for alleged violations of the "any-qualified-provider" provision(§1396a(a)(23)(A)) of…

1
Kennedy v. Braidwood Management: Appointments Clause and HHS Authority 16:57

4M ago16:57

16:57

A Notebook LM review of Kennedy v. Braidwood Management, concerning the constitutionality of appointments to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. The core dispute revolves around whether Task Force members are principal officers, requiring presidential nomination and Senate confirmation, or inferior officers, who can be appointed by a departmen…

1
FCC v. Consumers' Research: Universal Service Fund Constitutionality 15:28

4M ago15:28

15:28

This episode is a Notebook LM review of a Supreme Court opinion concerning a challenge to the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) universal-service contribution scheme, as heard on certiorari from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The central issue revolves around whether Congress's delegation of authority to the FCC a…

1
Universal Injunctions and Birthright Citizenship: Trump v. CASA 21:19

4M ago21:19

21:19

This is a Notebook LM review of the Supreme Court case, Trump v. CASA, Inc., addressing the use of universal injunctions against a presidential Executive Order (No. 14160) concerning birthright citizenship. The majority opinion by Justice Barrett, joined by five other justices, holds that such broad injunctions, which prohibit enforcement against a…

1
Free Speech and Online Age Verification: Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton 21:25

4M ago21:25

21:25

A Notebook LM review of the Supreme Court Decision in Free Speech Coalition, Inc., et al. v. Paxton, Attorney General of Texas. The core issue revolves around Texas H.B. 1181, a law requiring commercial websites with more than one-third of their content being "sexual material harmful to minors" to implement age verification for visitors. The Court'…

1
Mahmoud v. Taylor: Parental Rights in Public School Curriculum 18:47

4M ago18:47

18:47

This is a Notebook LM podcast review of Supreme Court opinion concerning a Maryland school board's introduction of "LGBTQ+-inclusive" storybooks into its elementary curriculum and its decision to remove parental opt-out options. The majority opinion, delivered by Justice Alito, finds that the school board's policy unconstitutionally burdens parents…

1
Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton (Texas Pornography Regulation) 9:35

4M ago9:35

9:35

Send us a text Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton Texas, like many States, prohibits distributing sexually explicit content to children. In 2023, Texas enacted H. B. 1181, requiring certain commercial websites publishing sexually explicit content that is obscene to minors to verify that visitors are 18 or older. Knowing violations subject covere…

1
Hewitt v. United States 8:22

4M ago8:22

8:22

Send us a text Hewitt v. United States Before the First Step Act was enacted in 2018, federal judges were required to sentence first-time offenders convicted of violating 18 U. S. C. §924(c)—a law that criminalizes possessing a firearm while committing other crimes—to “stacked” 25-year periods of incarceration. The First Step Act eliminated this ha…

1
Medina v. Planned Parenthood (Medicaid Funding) 11:23

4M ago11:23

11:23

Send us a text Median v. Planned Parenthood Held: Section 1396a(a)(23)(A) does not clearly and unambiguously confer individual rights enforceable under §1983.بقلم Jake Leahy

1
Riley v. Bondi (Immigration Removal) 9:08

5M ago9:08

9:08

Send us a text Riley v. Bondi The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) sought to remove Pierre Riley, a citizen of Jamaica, from the United States under expedited procedures for aliens convicted of aggravated felonies. On January 26, 2021, the DHS issued a “final administrative review order” (FARO) directing Riley’s removal to Jamaica. Under 8 U. …

1
Stanely v. City of Sanford (ADA) 6:54

5M ago6:54

6:54

Send us a text Stanley v. City of Sanford Karyn Stanley worked as a firefighter for the City of Sanford, Florida, starting in 1999. When Ms. Stanley was hired, the City offered health insurance until age 65 for two categories of retirees: those with 25 years of service and those who retired earlier due to disability. In 2003, the City changed its p…

1
Fuld v. Palestinian Liberation Organization (Due Process) 9:24

5M ago9:24

9:24

Send us a text Held: The PSJVTA’s personal jurisdiction provision does not violate the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause because the statute reasonably ties the assertion of jurisdiction over the PLO and PA to conduct involving the United States and implicating sensitive foreign policy matters within the prerogative of the political branches. Re…

1
Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPA (ARTICLE 3 STANDING, ADMIN LAW) 9:31

5M ago9:31

9:31

Send us a text https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24-7_8m58.pdfبقلم Jake Leahy

1
ESTERAS v. UNITED STATES (Revocation of Supervised release/factors courts may and may not consider) 10:51

5M ago10:51

10:51

Send us a textبقلم Jake Leahy

1
United States v. Skrmetti (Transgender Treatment) 12:06

5M ago12:06

12:06

Send us a text In 2023, Tennessee joined the growing number of States restricting sex transition treatments for minors by enacting the Prohibition on Medical Procedures Performed on Minors Related to Sexual Identity, Senate Bill 1 (SB1). SB1 prohibits healthcare providers from prescribing, administering, or dispensing puberty blockers or hormones t…

1
Rivers v. Guerrero (Habeus Petition) 7:05

5M ago7:05

7:05

Send us a text Rivers v. Guerrero Petitioner Danny Rivers was convicted in Texas state court of continuous sexual abuse of a child and related charges. After unsuccessfully seeking direct appeal and state habeas relief, Rivers filed his first federal habeas petition under 28 U. S. C. §2254 in August 2017, asserting claims of prosecutorial misconduc…

1
Commissioner v. Zuch (Tax Court Jurisdiction) 7:34

5M ago7:34

7:34

Send us a text Commissioner v. Zuch This case involves the jurisdiction of the United States Tax Court over appeals from collection due process hearings when there is no longer an ongoing levy. The dispute here began in 2012, when Jennifer Zuch and her then-husband Patrick Gennardo each filed an untimely 2010 federal tax return. Gennardo subsequent…

1
Parrish v. United States (Appellate Procedure) 6:44

5M ago6:44

6:44

Send us a text Parrish v. United States Federal inmate Donte Parrish alleges that he was placed in restrictive segregated confinement for 23 months based on his suspected involvement in another inmate’s death. After a hearing officer cleared him of wrongdoing, Parrish filed suit in Federal District Court seeking damages for his time in segregated c…

1
Soto v. United States (VA Benefits) 5:43

5M ago5:43

5:43

Send us a text Soto v. United States The Barring Act, 31 U. S. C. §3702, establishes default settlement procedures for claims against the Government and subjects most claims to a 6-year limitations period. However, the Act includes an exception: If “another law” confers authority to settle a claim against the Government, that law displaces the Barr…

1
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY v. CALUMET SHREVEPORT REFINING, L.L.C (VENUE FOR CLEAN AIR ACT CASES) 10:50

5M ago10:50

10:50

Send us a textبقلم Jake Leahy

1
PERTTU v. RICHARD (Prison Littigation Reform Act Exhaustion & Jury Trial Right) 10:55

5M ago10:55

10:55

Send us a textبقلم Jake Leahy

1
AJT v. Osseo Area Schools (Education / Disability) 9:08

5M ago9:08

9:08

Send us a text AJT v. Osseo Area Schools Held: Schoolchildren bringing ADA and Rehabilitation Act claims related to their education are not required to make a heightened showing of “bad faith or gross misjudgment” but instead are subject to the same standards that apply in other disability discrimination contexts. ROBERTS, C. J., delivered the opin…

1
Catholic Charities v. Wisconsin (First Amendment) 5:55

5M ago5:55

5:55

Send us a text Catholic Charities v. Wisconsin Wisconsin law exempts certain religious organizations from paying unemployment compensation taxes. The relevant statute exempts nonprofit organizations “operated primarily for religious purposes” and “operated, supervised, controlled, or principally supported by a church or convention or association of…

1
CC/Devas (Mauritius) Ltd. v. Antrix Corp. (Jurisdiction / Foreign Immunity) 6:14

5M ago6:14

6:14

Send us a text Held: Personal jurisdiction exists under the FSIA when an immunity exception applies and service is proper. The FSIA does not require proof of “minimum contacts” over and above the contacts already required by the Act’s enumerated exceptions to foreign sovereign immunity. Read by Jeff Barnum. Justice Alito delivered the opinion for a…

1
Blom Bank v. Honickman (Civil Procedure) 6:37

5M ago6:37

6:37

Send us a text Held: Relief under Rule 60(b)(6) requires extraordinary circumstances, and this standard does not become less demanding when the movant seeks to reopen a case to amend a complaint. A party must first satisfy Rule 60(b) before Rule 15(a)’s liberal amendment standard can apply.بقلم Jake Leahy

1
Seven County Infrastructure v. Eagle County 7:40

5M ago7:40

7:40

Send us a text Held: The D. C. Circuit failed to afford the Board the substantial judicial deference required in NEPA cases and incorrectly interpreted NEPA to require the Board to consider the environmental effects of upstream and downstream projects that are separate in time or place from the Uinta Basin Railway. Pp. 6–22. Read by Jeff Barnum.…